Gundlach Christopher, Müller Matthias M, Nierhaus Till, Villringer Arno, Sehm Bernhard
Department for Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain SciencesLeipzig, Germany.
Institute of Psychology, University of LeipzigLeipzig, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Aug 25;11:432. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00432. eCollection 2017.
: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is emerging as an interventional tool to modulate different functions of the brain, potentially by interacting with intrinsic ongoing neuronal oscillations. Functionally different intrinsic alpha oscillations are found throughout the cortex. Yet it remains unclear whether tACS is capable of specifically modulating the somatosensory mu-rhythm in amplitude. : We used tACS to modulate mu-alpha oscillations in amplitude. When compared to sham stimulation we expected a modulation of mu-alpha oscillations but not visual alpha oscillations by tACS. : Individual mu-alpha frequencies were determined in 25 participants. Subsequently, blocks of tACS with individual mu-alpha frequency and sham stimulation were applied over primary somatosensory cortex (SI). Electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded before and after either stimulation or sham. Modulations of mu-alpha and, for control, visual alpha amplitudes were then compared between tACS and sham. : Somatosensory mu-alpha oscillations decreased in amplitude after tACS was applied at participants' individual mu-alpha frequency. No changes in amplitude were observed for sham stimulation. Furthermore, visual alpha oscillations were not affected by tACS or sham, respectively. : Our results demonstrate the capability of tACS to specifically modulate the targeted somatosensory mu-rhythm when the tACS frequency is tuned to the individual endogenous rhythm and applied over somatosensory areas. Our results are in contrast to previously reported amplitude increases of visual alpha oscillations induced by tACS applied over visual cortex. Our results may point to a specific interaction between our stimulation protocol and the functional architecture of the somatosensory system.
经颅交流电刺激(tACS)正逐渐成为一种干预工具,可能通过与内在持续的神经元振荡相互作用来调节大脑的不同功能。在整个皮层中发现了功能不同的内在α振荡。然而,tACS是否能够特异性地调节体感μ节律的幅度仍不清楚。
我们使用tACS来调节μ-α振荡的幅度。与假刺激相比,我们预期tACS能调节μ-α振荡,但不能调节视觉α振荡。
在25名参与者中确定了个体的μ-α频率。随后,在初级体感皮层(SI)上施加具有个体μ-α频率的tACS块和假刺激。在刺激或假刺激前后记录脑电图(EEG)。然后比较tACS和假刺激之间μ-α以及作为对照的视觉α振幅的调制情况。
在以参与者个体的μ-α频率施加tACS后,体感μ-α振荡的幅度降低。假刺激未观察到幅度变化。此外,视觉α振荡分别不受tACS或假刺激的影响。
我们的结果表明,当tACS频率调整到个体内源性节律并应用于体感区域时,tACS能够特异性地调节目标体感μ节律。我们的结果与先前报道的在视觉皮层上应用tACS引起视觉α振荡幅度增加的情况相反。我们的结果可能指向我们的刺激方案与体感系统功能结构之间的特定相互作用。