Zarubin Georgy, Gundlach Christopher, Nikulin Vadim, Villringer Arno, Bogdan Martin
Technical Informatics Department, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Sep 4;14:366. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00366. eCollection 2020.
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) have recently become extensively utilized due to their potential to modulate ongoing neuronal oscillatory activity and consequently to induce cortical plasticity relevant for various cognitive functions. However, the neurophysiological basis for stimulation effects as well as their inter-individual differences is not yet understood. In the present study, we used a closed-loop electroencephalography-tACS(EEG-tACS) protocol to examine the modulation of alpha oscillations generated in occipito-parietal areas. In particular, we investigated the effects of a repeated short-time intermittent stimulation protocol (1 s in every trial) applied over the visual cortex (Cz and Oz) and adjusted according to the phase and frequency of visual alpha oscillations on the amplitude of these oscillations. Based on previous findings, we expected higher increases in alpha amplitudes for tACS applied in-phase with ongoing oscillations as compared to an application in anti-phase and this modulation to be present in low-alpha amplitude states of the visual system (eyes opened, EO) but not high (eyes closed, EC). Contrary to our expectations, we found a transient suppression of alpha power in inter-individually derived spatially specific parieto-occipital components obtained the estimation of spatial filters by using the common spatial patterns approach. The amplitude modulation was independent of the phase relationship between the tACS signal and alpha oscillations, and the state of the visual system manipulated closed- and open-eye conditions. It was also absent in conventionally analyzed single-channel and multi-channel data from an average parieto-occipital region. The fact that the tACS modulation of oscillations was phase-independent suggests that mechanisms driving the effects of tACS may not be explained by entrainment alone, but rather require neuroplastic changes or transient disruption of neural oscillations. Our study also supports the notion that the response to tACS is subject-specific, where the modulatory effects are shaped by the interplay between the stimulation and different alpha generators. This favors stimulation protocols as well as analysis regimes exploiting inter-individual differences, such as spatial filters to reveal otherwise hidden stimulation effects and, thereby, comprehensively induce and study the effects and underlying mechanisms of tACS.
诸如经颅交流电刺激(tACS)之类的非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)技术近来已被广泛应用,因为它们有潜力调节正在进行的神经元振荡活动,并因此诱导与各种认知功能相关的皮质可塑性。然而,刺激效果的神经生理学基础及其个体差异尚未得到理解。在本研究中,我们使用了一种闭环脑电图 - tACS(EEG - tACS)方案来检查枕顶区域产生的α振荡的调制情况。特别地,我们研究了一种重复的短时间歇性刺激方案(每次试验1秒)施加于视觉皮层(Cz和Oz)并根据视觉α振荡的相位和频率进行调整后,对这些振荡幅度的影响。基于先前的研究结果,我们预期与反相施加相比,与正在进行的振荡同相施加tACS时α振幅会有更高的增加,并且这种调制会出现在视觉系统的低α振幅状态(睁眼,EO)而非高α振幅状态(闭眼,EC)。与我们的预期相反,我们发现在通过使用共同空间模式方法估计空间滤波器而得到的个体间空间特异性顶枕成分中,α功率出现了短暂抑制。振幅调制与tACS信号和α振荡之间的相位关系以及通过闭眼和睁眼条件操纵的视觉系统状态无关。在传统分析的来自平均顶枕区域的单通道和多通道数据中也不存在这种情况。tACS对振荡的调制与相位无关这一事实表明,驱动tACS效应的机制可能不能仅用夹带作用来解释,而是需要神经可塑性变化或神经振荡的短暂中断。我们的研究还支持这样一种观点,即对tACS的反应是个体特异性的,其中调制效应是由刺激与不同α发生器之间的相互作用所塑造的。这有利于刺激方案以及利用个体差异的分析方法,例如空间滤波器,以揭示其他隐藏的刺激效果,从而全面诱导和研究tACS的效果及其潜在机制。