经颅交流电刺激和神经反馈对阿尔法(脑电图)动力学的影响:综述

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Neurofeedback on Alpha (EEG) Dynamics: A Review.

作者信息

Orendáčová Mária, Kvašňák Eugen

机构信息

Department of Medical Biophysics and Medical Informatics, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jul 8;15:628229. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.628229. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and neurofeedback (NFB) are two different types of non-invasive neuromodulation techniques, which can modulate brain activity and improve brain functioning. In this review, we compared the current state of knowledge related to the mechanisms of tACS and NFB and their effects on electroencephalogram (EEG) activity (online period/stimulation period) and on aftereffects (offline period/post/stimulation period), including the duration of their persistence and potential behavioral benefits. Since alpha bandwidth has been broadly studied in NFB and in tACS research, the studies of NFB and tACS in modulating alpha bandwidth were selected for comparing the online and offline effects of these two neuromodulation techniques. The factors responsible for variability in the responsiveness of the modulated EEG activity by tACS and NFB were analyzed and compared too. Based on the current literature related to tACS and NFB, it can be concluded that tACS and NFB differ a lot in the mechanisms responsible for their effects on an online EEG activity but they possibly share the common universal mechanisms responsible for the induction of aftereffects in the targeted stimulated EEG band, namely Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity. Many studies of both neuromodulation techniques report the aftereffects connected to the behavioral benefits. The duration of persistence of aftereffects for NFB and tACS is comparable. In relation to the factors influencing responsiveness to tACS and NFB, significantly more types of factors were analyzed in the NFB studies compared to the tACS studies. Several common factors for both tACS and NFB have been already investigated. Based on these outcomes, we propose several new research directions regarding tACS and NFB.

摘要

经颅交流电刺激(tACS)和神经反馈(NFB)是两种不同类型的非侵入性神经调节技术,它们可以调节大脑活动并改善脑功能。在本综述中,我们比较了与tACS和NFB机制相关的当前知识状态,以及它们对脑电图(EEG)活动(在线期/刺激期)和后效应(离线期/刺激后)的影响,包括其持续时间和潜在的行为益处。由于在NFB和tACS研究中对α频段进行了广泛研究,因此选择了NFB和tACS调节α频段的研究来比较这两种神经调节技术的在线和离线效应。还分析和比较了tACS和NFB调节EEG活动反应性变异性的相关因素。基于与tACS和NFB相关的当前文献,可以得出结论,tACS和NFB在对在线EEG活动产生影响的机制上有很大差异,但它们可能共享在目标刺激EEG频段诱导后效应的共同普遍机制,即赫布可塑性和稳态可塑性。两种神经调节技术的许多研究都报告了与行为益处相关的后效应。NFB和tACS后效应的持续时间相当。关于影响对tACS和NFB反应性的因素,与tACS研究相比,NFB研究中分析的因素类型明显更多。已经对tACS和NFB的几个共同因素进行了研究。基于这些结果,我们提出了一些关于tACS和NFB的新研究方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5859/8297546/9ddaa9df1925/fnhum-15-628229-g0001.jpg

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索