• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessment of fingolimod versus dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of multiple sclerosis; a 24-month follow-up study.芬戈莫德与富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的疗效评估:一项24个月的随访研究。
Am J Clin Exp Immunol. 2021 Oct 15;10(3):86-92. eCollection 2021.
2
Real-world effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate versus fingolimod in a cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis using standardized, quantitative outcome metrics.使用标准化定量结局指标,比较富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德在一组多发性硬化症患者中的真实世界有效性。
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2022 Jan 7;8(1):20552173211069852. doi: 10.1177/20552173211069852. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
3
Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 12-month follow-up.在 12 个月的随访中,二甲基富马酸酯和芬戈莫德在临床实践中的疗效和停药比较。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Nov;10:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
Comparative discontinuation, effectiveness, and switching practices of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod at 36-month follow-up.在 36 个月随访时,二甲基富马酸酯和芬戈莫德的停药、疗效和转换实践比较。
J Neurol Sci. 2019 Dec 15;407:116498. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116498. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
5
Comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate versus fingolimod and teriflunomide among MS patients switching from first-generation platform therapies in the US.美国首发平台治疗药物转换的 MS 患者中,富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德和特立氟胺的疗效比较。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.038. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
6
Oral therapies for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Austria: a 2-year comparison using an inverse probability weighting method.奥地利用于治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的口服疗法:使用逆概率加权法进行的 2 年比较。
J Neurol. 2020 Jul;267(7):2090-2100. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09811-6. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
7
Cladribine tablets versus other disease-modifying oral drugs in achieving no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) in multiple sclerosis-A systematic review and network meta-analysis.氯法拉滨片与其他改善病情的口服药物在多发性硬化症中实现无疾病活动证据(NEDA)的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 Apr;49:102769. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102769. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
8
A propensity-matched comparison of long-term disability worsening in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod.富马酸二甲酯或芬戈莫德治疗的多发性硬化症患者长期残疾恶化的倾向匹配比较。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021 Jun 30;14:17562864211021177. doi: 10.1177/17562864211021177. eCollection 2021.
9
Discontinuation and comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in 2 centers.富马酸二甲酯和芬戈莫德在两个中心的停药情况及疗效对比
Neurol Clin Pract. 2018 Aug;8(4):292-301. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000487.
10
Dimethyl fumarate vs fingolimod following different pretreatments: A retrospective study.富马酸二甲酯与不同预处理后的芬戈莫德:一项回顾性研究。
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020 Jan 14;7(2). doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000660. Print 2020 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Long Non-Coding RNA X-Inactive-Specific Transcript () in Neuroinflammation and Myelination: Insights from Cerebral Organoids and Implications for Multiple Sclerosis.长链非编码RNA X染色体失活特异性转录本()在神经炎症和髓鞘形成中的作用:来自脑类器官的见解及对多发性硬化症的启示
Noncoding RNA. 2025 Apr 29;11(3):31. doi: 10.3390/ncrna11030031.
2
The neuroprotective potential of Gerbera Jamesonii in a neuronal demyelination rat model through the modulation of interleukins, cyclooxygenase and tumor necrosis factor-α.通过调节白细胞介素、环氧化酶和肿瘤坏死因子-α,非洲菊在神经元脱髓鞘大鼠模型中的神经保护潜力。
Inflammopharmacology. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10787-025-01742-w.
3
An updated systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the efficacy and safety of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).一项最新的系统评价和荟萃分析,探讨富马酸二甲酯(DMF)对多发性硬化症(MS)患者的疗效和安全性。
BMJ Neurol Open. 2024 Dec 18;6(2):e000872. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2024-000872. eCollection 2024.
4
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.免疫调节剂和免疫抑制剂治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的网状 Meta 分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 4;1(1):CD011381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011381.pub3.
5
Adverse effects of immunotherapies for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.免疫疗法治疗多发性硬化症的不良反应:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):CD012186. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012186.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Alcohol and multiple sclerosis: an immune system-based review.酒精与多发性硬化症:基于免疫系统的综述
Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol. 2020 Apr 15;12(2):58-69. eCollection 2020.
2
Mechanism and adverse effects of multiple sclerosis drugs: a review article. Part 2.多发性硬化症药物的作用机制及不良反应:综述文章。第2部分。
Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol. 2019 Aug 15;11(4):105-114. eCollection 2019.
3
Mechanism and adverse effects of multiple sclerosis drugs: a review article. Part 1.多发性硬化症药物的作用机制及不良反应:一篇综述文章。第1部分。
Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol. 2019 Aug 15;11(4):95-104. eCollection 2019.
4
Natalizumab versus fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德和富马酸二甲酯在多发性硬化症治疗中的比较。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Dec 9;6(2):252-262. doi: 10.1002/acn3.700. eCollection 2019 Feb.
5
Comparison of fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis.比较芬戈莫德、二甲基富马酸酯和特立氟胺治疗多发性硬化症。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;90(4):458-468. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319831. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
6
Predictors of hematological abnormalities in multiple sclerosis patients treated with fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate and impact of treatment switch on lymphocyte and leukocyte count.接受芬戈莫德和二甲基富马酸治疗的多发性硬化症患者血液学异常的预测因素及治疗转换对淋巴细胞和白细胞计数的影响。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Feb;20:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
7
Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 24-month follow-up.富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德在临床实践中24个月随访时的疗效比较及停药情况
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Aug 24;3(3):2055217317715485. doi: 10.1177/2055217317715485. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
8
Comparison of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: Two-year experience.芬戈莫德与富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的比较:两年经验
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Aug 17;3(3):2055217317725102. doi: 10.1177/2055217317725102. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
9
Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 12-month follow-up.在 12 个月的随访中,二甲基富马酸酯和芬戈莫德在临床实践中的疗效和停药比较。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Nov;10:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
10
Comparing outcomes from clinical studies of oral disease-modifying therapies (dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, and teriflunomide) in relapsing MS: Assessing absolute differences using a number needed to treat analysis.比较多发性硬化症(dimethyl fumarate、fingolimod 和 teriflunomide)口服疾病修饰疗法的临床研究结果:使用需要治疗的人数分析评估绝对差异。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Nov;10:204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

芬戈莫德与富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的疗效评估:一项24个月的随访研究。

Assessment of fingolimod versus dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of multiple sclerosis; a 24-month follow-up study.

作者信息

Masjedi Samane-Sadat, Etemadifar Masoud, Zadeh Nadia Mohammad, Afzali Mahdieh

机构信息

Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran.

School of Medicine, Islamic Azad University Tehran Faculty of Medicine Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Am J Clin Exp Immunol. 2021 Oct 15;10(3):86-92. eCollection 2021.

PMID:34824898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8610802/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) using disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is a challenge worldwide. Fingolimod (FTY) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are two approved agents for oral treatment of MS with remarkable efficacy for relapse control and deceleration of disability progression. Therefore, the current study was done to compare disability control, lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and adverse effects between the patients treated with FTY and DMF.

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial (IR.MUI.REC.1396.3.786) was conducted on 60 patients who were randomly divided into two groups of treatment with 0.5 mg daily dose of FTY (n = 30) and 240 mg dose of DMF twice daily (n = 30). Disability of patients was assessed using the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) within 6 weeks, 12, and 24 months following treatment initiation and MRI was performed for all the patients prior to study initiation and within 24 months. Obtained data were compared between two study groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between two treatment groups based on EDSS scores, brain lesions in MRI, and newly formed plaques (P>0.05). Skin and gastrointestinal-related complaints were the most common adverse effects of DMF while the increase in liver enzyme level and thrombocytopenia were the most common complications of FTY, respectively (-value = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

According to our findings, within 24-month follow-up, DMF was neither superior nor inferior to FTY comparing MRI lesions, EDSS scores, and adverse effects. Although, further evaluations with larger sample size are recommended.

摘要

背景

在全球范围内,使用疾病修正疗法(DMTs)口服治疗多发性硬化症(MS)是一项挑战。芬戈莫德(FTY)和富马酸二甲酯(DMF)是两种已获批的口服治疗MS的药物,在控制复发和减缓残疾进展方面具有显著疗效。因此,本研究旨在比较接受FTY和DMF治疗的患者在残疾控制、磁共振成像(MRI)中的病灶以及不良反应方面的差异。

方法

本随机临床试验(IR.MUI.REC.1396.3.786)对60例患者进行,这些患者被随机分为两组,一组每日服用0.5毫克FTY(n = 30),另一组每日两次服用240毫克DMF(n = 30)。在治疗开始后的6周、12个月和24个月内,使用扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)评估患者的残疾情况,并在研究开始前和24个月内对所有患者进行MRI检查。对两个研究组获得的数据进行比较。

结果

基于EDSS评分、MRI中的脑病灶和新形成的斑块,两个治疗组之间没有显著差异(P>0.05)。皮肤和胃肠道相关的不适是DMF最常见的不良反应,而肝酶水平升高和血小板减少分别是FTY最常见的并发症(P值 = 0.22)。

结论

根据我们的研究结果,在24个月的随访中,比较MRI病灶、EDSS评分和不良反应,DMF既不优于也不劣于FTY。尽管如此,建议进行更大样本量的进一步评估。