Matthes Jan, Giesler Marianne, Wagner-Menghin Michaela, Himmelbauer Monika, Preusche Ingrid, Schüttpelz-Brauns Katrin
University of Cologne, Institute II, Center for Pharmacology, Cologne, Germany.
University of Freiburg, Medical Faculty, Office of Student Affairs, Centre for Evaluation of Teaching in Medicine Baden-Württemberg, Freiburg, Germany.
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Aug 15;34(3):Doc32. doi: 10.3205/zma001109. eCollection 2017.
The significance of medical education research has increased internationally. In this context we investigated whether, and if so, how the quantity and quality of scientific papers reviewed and/or published by the (GMS Z Med Ausbild) changed. The quantity and ratio of original papers, project reports and reviews submitted to or published in the GMS Z Med Ausbild were analysed. Published scientific articles were investigated in regard to the quality features "study type" and "mode of data collection" as well as the background (university affiliation) of the last authors. The citation frequency within the first five years after PubMed listing was compared to the one of BMC Medical Education in the corresponding period. The number of submitted scientific manuscripts increased steadily. Most of the submissions and publications are original papers. For publications explorative studies and prospective data collection are most common. A shift over time is not observed. 16% of the published works come from one and 36% from four of the in total 39 universities represented by the last authors. The development of the citation frequency of articles published in GMS Z Med Ausbild is similar to that of BMC Medical Education. The rising number of submissions indicates an increasing significance of medical education research in German-speaking countries. The development of the number of citations reflects the growing appreciation of GMS Z Med Ausbild also indicated by the increasing number of online accesses. Our findings that study type and mode of data collection did not change has to be interpreted with caution since among other things choice and correct application of adequate methods are crucial regarding a scientific work's quality, too. These aspects, however, were not investigated in this paper.
医学教育研究的重要性在国际上日益增加。在此背景下,我们调查了《GMS Z Med Ausbild》所评审和/或发表的科学论文的数量和质量是否发生了变化,若有变化,则探究其变化方式。分析了提交至《GMS Z Med Ausbild》或在该期刊上发表的原创论文、项目报告和综述的数量及比例。针对已发表的科学文章,研究了“研究类型”和“数据收集方式”等质量特征以及最后作者的背景(大学所属机构)。将PubMed收录后前五年内的被引频次与同期《BMC医学教育》的被引频次进行了比较。提交的科学稿件数量稳步增加。提交和发表的大多是原创论文。在发表的文章中,探索性研究和前瞻性数据收集最为常见。未观察到随时间的变化。已发表作品的16%来自最后作者所代表的总共39所大学中的一所,36%来自其中四所。《GMS Z Med Ausbild》上发表文章的被引频次发展情况与《BMC医学教育》相似。稿件数量的增加表明医学教育研究在德语国家的重要性日益凸显。被引频次的发展反映出《GMS Z Med Ausbild》越来越受到认可,在线访问量的增加也表明了这一点。我们关于研究类型和数据收集方式未发生变化的研究结果必须谨慎解读,因为除其他因素外,合适方法的选择和正确应用对于科学作品的质量也至关重要。然而,本文未对这些方面进行研究。