Suppr超能文献

美国疾病控制与预防中心应急响应中的科学:结构与功能

Science in Emergency Response at CDC: Structure and Functions.

作者信息

Iskander John, Rose Dale A, Ghiya Neelam D

机构信息

John Iskander and Neelam D. Ghiya are with Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA. Dale A. Rose is with Division of Emergency Operations, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, CDC.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(S2):S122-S125. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303951.

Abstract

Recent high-profile activations of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Emergency Operations Center (EOC) include responses to the West African Ebola and Zika virus epidemics. Within the EOC, emergency responses are organized according to the Incident Management System, which provides a standardized structure and chain of command, regardless of whether the EOC activation occurs in response to an outbreak, natural disaster, or other type of public health emergency. By embedding key scientific roles, such as the associate director for science, and functions within a Scientific Response Section, the current CDC emergency response structure ensures that both urgent and important science issues receive needed attention. Key functions during emergency responses include internal coordination of scientific work, data management, information dissemination, and scientific publication. We describe a case example involving the ongoing Zika virus response that demonstrates how the scientific response structure can be used to rapidly produce high-quality science needed to answer urgent public health questions and guide policy. Within the context of emergency response, longer-term priorities at CDC include both streamlining administrative requirements and funding mechanisms for scientific research.

摘要

美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)应急行动中心(EOC)近期备受瞩目的启动行动包括对西非埃博拉疫情和寨卡病毒疫情的应对。在应急行动中心内,应急响应是根据事件管理系统进行组织的,该系统提供了标准化的结构和指挥链,无论应急行动中心的启动是针对疫情爆发、自然灾害还是其他类型的公共卫生紧急情况。通过在科学应对部门中嵌入关键科学角色,如科学副主任等,并开展相关职能,当前的美国疾病控制与预防中心应急响应结构确保了紧迫且重要的科学问题得到所需关注。应急响应期间的关键职能包括科学工作的内部协调、数据管理、信息传播和科学出版。我们描述了一个涉及当前寨卡病毒应对行动的案例,该案例展示了科学应对结构如何能够用于迅速产出回答紧迫公共卫生问题和指导政策所需的高质量科学成果。在应急响应的背景下,美国疾病控制与预防中心的长期优先事项包括简化科研的行政要求和资金机制。

相似文献

3
CDC briefs communities about mass dispensing.美国疾病控制与预防中心向社区介绍大规模分发情况。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004 Aug 1;61(15):1541, 1546. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/61.15.1541.
7
CDC's Evolving Approach to Emergency Response.疾病预防控制中心的应急响应策略演变。
Health Secur. 2017 Jan/Feb;15(1):41-52. doi: 10.1089/hs.2017.0006. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

7
Using a Health Literacy Analytic Framework to Explore Zika Virus and Reproductive Health.运用健康素养分析框架探索寨卡病毒与生殖健康。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2018 Apr 12;2(2):e78-e87. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20180226-01. eCollection 2018 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
CDC Grand Rounds: Modeling and Public Health Decision-Making.疾病预防控制中心例会:建模与公共卫生决策。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Dec 9;65(48):1374-1377. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6548a4.
2
Developing a vaccine against Zika.研发一种针对寨卡病毒的疫苗。
BMJ. 2016 Nov 10;355:i5923. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5923.
3
Zika virus in semen: lessons from Ebola.精液中的寨卡病毒:来自埃博拉病毒的教训。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Oct;16(10):1107-1108. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30330-9. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
4
Zika Virus 6 Months Later.6个月后的寨卡病毒
JAMA. 2016 Oct 11;316(14):1443-1444. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11941.
6
Zika Virus and Birth Defects--Reviewing the Evidence for Causality.寨卡病毒与出生缺陷——因果关系证据综述
N Engl J Med. 2016 May 19;374(20):1981-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1604338. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验