Das Shubhagata, Dunbar Sherry, Tang Yi-Wei
Global Scientific Affairs, Luminex Corporation, Austin, TX, United States.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States.
Front Microbiol. 2018 Oct 18;9:2478. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02478. eCollection 2018.
In the pediatric population, respiratory infections are the most common cause of physician visits. Although many respiratory illnesses are self-limiting viral infections that resolve with time and supportive care, it can be critical to identify the causative pathogen at an early stage of the disease in order to implement effective antimicrobial therapy and infection control. Over the last few years, diagnostics for respiratory infections have evolved substantially, with the development of novel assays and the availability of updated tests for newer strains of pathogens. Newer laboratory methods are rapid, highly sensitive and specific, and are gradually replacing the conventional gold standards, although the clinical utility of these assays is still under evaluation. This article reviews the current laboratory methods available for testing for respiratory pathogens and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.
在儿科人群中,呼吸道感染是就医的最常见原因。尽管许多呼吸道疾病是自限性病毒感染,可随时间推移和支持性治疗而痊愈,但在疾病早期识别致病病原体对于实施有效的抗菌治疗和感染控制至关重要。在过去几年中,随着新型检测方法的开发以及针对新型病原体菌株的更新检测方法的出现,呼吸道感染的诊断有了显著进展。更新的实验室方法快速、高度灵敏且特异,尽管这些检测方法的临床实用性仍在评估中,但它们正逐渐取代传统的金标准。本文综述了目前可用于检测呼吸道病原体的实验室方法,并讨论了每种方法的优缺点。