• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物医学期刊科学编辑的核心能力:共识声明。

Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement.

作者信息

Moher David, Galipeau James, Alam Sabina, Barbour Virginia, Bartolomeos Kidist, Baskin Patricia, Bell-Syer Sally, Cobey Kelly D, Chan Leighton, Clark Jocalyn, Deeks Jonathan, Flanagin Annette, Garner Paul, Glenny Anne-Marie, Groves Trish, Gurusamy Kurinchi, Habibzadeh Farrokh, Jewell-Thomas Stefanie, Kelsall Diane, Lapeña José Florencio, MacLehose Harriet, Marusic Ana, McKenzie Joanne E, Shah Jay, Shamseer Larissa, Straus Sharon, Tugwell Peter, Wager Elizabeth, Winker Margaret, Zhaori Getu

机构信息

Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Rd, Room L1248, Box 201B, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.

School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2017 Sep 11;15(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0927-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12916-017-0927-0
PMID:28893269
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5592713/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Scientific editors are responsible for deciding which articles to publish in their journals. However, we have not found documentation of their required knowledge, skills, and characteristics, or the existence of any formal core competencies for this role.

METHODS

We describe the development of a minimum set of core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.

RESULTS

The 14 key core competencies are divided into three major areas, and each competency has a list of associated elements or descriptions of more specific knowledge, skills, and characteristics that contribute to its fulfillment.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that these core competencies are a baseline of the knowledge, skills, and characteristics needed to perform competently the duties of a scientific editor at a biomedical journal.

摘要

背景

科学编辑负责决定在其期刊上发表哪些文章。然而,我们尚未找到有关他们所需知识、技能和特质的文献记录,也未发现该角色存在任何正式的核心能力要求。

方法

我们描述了生物医学期刊科学编辑最低限度核心能力集的制定过程。

结果

14项关键核心能力分为三个主要领域,每项能力都有一系列相关要素或对有助于实现该能力的更具体知识、技能和特质的描述。

结论

我们认为,这些核心能力是胜任生物医学期刊科学编辑职责所需知识、技能和特质的基线。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f9/5592713/08f449453c36/12916_2017_927_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f9/5592713/08f449453c36/12916_2017_927_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55f9/5592713/08f449453c36/12916_2017_927_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement.生物医学期刊科学编辑的核心能力:共识声明。
BMC Med. 2017 Sep 11;15(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0927-0.
2
A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.生物医学期刊科学编辑能力的范围综述。
BMC Med. 2016 Feb 2;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0561-2.
3
An international survey and modified Delphi process revealed editors' perceptions, training needs, and ratings of competency-related statements for the development of core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.一项国际调查和改良的德尔菲法揭示了编辑对于生物医学期刊科学编辑核心能力发展的看法、培训需求以及对与能力相关陈述的评级。
F1000Res. 2017 Sep 4;6:1634. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12400.1. eCollection 2017.
4
Improving the biomedical research literature: insights from authors' editors can help journal editors define and refine their core competencies.改进生物医学研究文献:作者编辑的见解有助于期刊编辑界定和完善其核心能力。
F1000Res. 2018 Jan 25;7:109. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.13760.2. eCollection 2018.
5
Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.医学期刊编辑对生物医学期刊同行评审员角色和任务的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 24;9(11):e033421. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033421.
6
Key elements required to publish a good article: consensus among executive editors of Traditional Chinese Medicine and integrative medicine journals - a Delphi study.发表一篇优秀文章所需的关键要素:中医与中西医结合期刊执行编辑之间的共识——一项德尔菲研究
J Tradit Chin Med. 2015 Jun;35(3):335-42. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(15)30107-2.
7
Medical journals--in the news and for the wrong reasons.医学期刊——登上新闻却原因不当。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2014 Jan-Mar;11(1):7-9. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2014.003.
8
Biosecurity and the review and publication of dual-use research of concern.生物安全以及对两用关注研究的审查与发表
Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Sep;10(3):290-8. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0011. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
9
Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study.生物医学学科领域的作者与编辑对掠夺性期刊的看法:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 30;21(8):e13769. doi: 10.2196/13769.
10
Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.向生物医学期刊投稿的统一要求。国际医学期刊编辑委员会。
JAMA. 1997 Mar 19;277(11):927-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Editors-in-chief in social sciences: Mapping the institutional, geographical, and gender representation between academic fields.社会科学领域的主编:描绘学术领域之间的机构、地理和性别代表性情况。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 20;20(2):e0317931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317931. eCollection 2025.
2
Behind the scenes: exploring neurological journal editors' work habits, decisions, and potential sources of conflict of interest.幕后:探究神经学杂志编辑的工作习惯、决策以及潜在的利益冲突来源。
J Neurol. 2024 Dec 12;272(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12780-9.
3
Evaluation of editors' abilities to predict the citation potential of research manuscripts submitted to : a cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
An international survey and modified Delphi process revealed editors' perceptions, training needs, and ratings of competency-related statements for the development of core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.一项国际调查和改良的德尔菲法揭示了编辑对于生物医学期刊科学编辑核心能力发展的看法、培训需求以及对与能力相关陈述的评级。
F1000Res. 2017 Sep 4;6:1634. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12400.1. eCollection 2017.
2
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.潜在的掠夺性和正规生物医学期刊:你能区分出来吗?一项横断面比较。
BMC Med. 2017 Mar 16;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9.
3
评估编辑预测投稿研究手稿被引潜力的能力:一项队列研究。
BMJ. 2022 Dec 14;379:e073880. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073880.
4
Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and recent developments on the communication of clinical trials, publishing practices, and research integrity: in conversation with Dr. David Moher.从 COVID-19 大流行和临床试验沟通、出版实践和研究诚信方面的最新发展中吸取的教训:与 David Moher 博士对话。
Trials. 2022 Aug 17;23(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06624-y.
5
Consensus statement on measures to promote equitable authorship in the publication of research from international partnerships.关于促进国际合作研究成果公平署名措施的共识声明。
Anaesthesia. 2022 Mar;77(3):264-276. doi: 10.1111/anae.15597. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
6
Improving the quality of toxicology and environmental health systematic reviews: What journal editors can do.提高毒理学和环境卫生系统评价的质量:期刊编辑能做些什么。
ALTEX. 2021;38(3):513-522. doi: 10.14573/altex.2106111. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
7
The limitations to our understanding of peer review.我们对同行评审理解的局限性。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020 Apr 30;5:6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00092-1. eCollection 2020.
8
Developing Academic Advisors and Competence Committees members: A community approach to developing CBME faculty leaders.培养学术顾问和能力委员会成员:一种培养基于能力的医学教育(CBME)教师领导者的社区方法。
Can Med Educ J. 2020 Mar 16;11(1):e46-e56. doi: 10.36834/cmej.68181. eCollection 2020 Mar.
9
Revised Publication Policies by Higher Education Commission for Health Science Journals.高等教育委员会针对健康科学期刊制定的修订版出版政策。
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Jan-Feb;36(2):1-3. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.2.2133.
10
Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.医学期刊编辑对生物医学期刊同行评审员角色和任务的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 24;9(11):e033421. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033421.
Impact of a web-based tool (WebCONSORT) to improve the reporting of randomised trials: results of a randomised controlled trial.
基于网络的工具(WebCONSORT)对改善随机试验报告的影响:一项随机对照试验的结果
BMC Med. 2016 Nov 28;14(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0736-x.
4
Increasing the evidence base in journalology: creating an international best practice journal research network.扩充期刊学的证据基础:创建一个国际最佳实践期刊研究网络。
BMC Med. 2016 Oct 10;14(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0707-2.
5
Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency.认可开放实践的徽章:一种提高透明度的简单、低成本且有效的方法。
PLoS Biol. 2016 May 12;14(5):e1002456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456. eCollection 2016 May.
6
A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.生物医学期刊科学编辑能力的范围综述。
BMC Med. 2016 Feb 2;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0561-2.
7
How should medical science change?医学应该如何改变?
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):197-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62678-1. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
8
A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation.再看一眼综合知识转化。
Health Policy. 2013 Feb;109(2):187-91. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
9
Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States Data.发表压力会增加科学家的偏见吗?来自美国各州数据的实证支持。
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 21;5(4):e10271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010271.