Kidwell Mallory C, Lazarević Ljiljana B, Baranski Erica, Hardwicke Tom E, Piechowski Sarah, Falkenberg Lina-Sophia, Kennett Curtis, Slowik Agnieszka, Sonnleitner Carina, Hess-Holden Chelsey, Errington Timothy M, Fiedler Susann, Nosek Brian A
Center for Open Science, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
PLoS Biol. 2016 May 12;14(5):e1002456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456. eCollection 2016 May.
Beginning January 2014, Psychological Science gave authors the opportunity to signal open data and materials if they qualified for badges that accompanied published articles. Before badges, less than 3% of Psychological Science articles reported open data. After badges, 23% reported open data, with an accelerating trend; 39% reported open data in the first half of 2015, an increase of more than an order of magnitude from baseline. There was no change over time in the low rates of data sharing among comparison journals. Moreover, reporting openness does not guarantee openness. When badges were earned, reportedly available data were more likely to be actually available, correct, usable, and complete than when badges were not earned. Open materials also increased to a weaker degree, and there was more variability among comparison journals. Badges are simple, effective signals to promote open practices and improve preservation of data and materials by using independent repositories.
从2014年1月开始,《心理科学》为符合条件的作者提供了在已发表文章中表明数据和材料开放的机会,这些文章会附带相关标识。在引入标识之前,只有不到3%的《心理科学》文章报告了开放数据。引入标识之后,有23%的文章报告了开放数据,且呈加速趋势;在2015年上半年,39%的文章报告了开放数据,与基线相比增长超过了一个数量级。对照期刊的数据共享率较低,且未随时间变化。此外,报告开放并不保证实际开放。获得标识时,据报道可获取的数据比未获得标识时更有可能实际可用、正确、可用且完整。开放材料也有一定程度的增加,但对照期刊之间的差异更大。标识是一种简单有效的信号,通过使用独立存储库来促进开放实践并改善数据和材料的保存。