• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multiprotocol, multiatlas statistical fusion: theory and application.多协议、多图谱统计融合:理论与应用
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017 Jul;4(3):034002. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.034002. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
2
Statistical label fusion with hierarchical performance models.具有分层性能模型的统计标签融合
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2014 Mar 21;9034:90341E. doi: 10.1117/12.2043182.
3
Automated segmentation of the thyroid gland on thoracic CT scans by multiatlas label fusion and random forest classification.通过多图谱标签融合和随机森林分类对胸部CT扫描中的甲状腺进行自动分割。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2015 Oct;2(4):044006. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.4.044006. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
4
Hierarchical performance estimation in the statistical label fusion framework.统计标签融合框架中的分层性能估计
Med Image Anal. 2014 Oct;18(7):1070-81. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
5
Enhancing atlas based segmentation with multiclass linear classifiers.使用多类线性分类器增强基于图谱的分割
Med Phys. 2015 Dec;42(12):7169-81. doi: 10.1118/1.4935946.
6
iSTAPLE: Improved Label Fusion for Segmentation by Combining STAPLE with Image Intensity.iSTAPLE:通过将STAPLE与图像强度相结合改进分割的标签融合
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2013 Feb;8669. doi: 10.1117/12.2006447. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
7
Multiatlas whole heart segmentation of CT data using conditional entropy for atlas ranking and selection.使用条件熵进行图谱排序和选择的CT数据多图谱全心分割
Med Phys. 2015 Jul;42(7):3822-33. doi: 10.1118/1.4921366.
8
Atlas-based automatic mouse brain image segmentation revisited: model complexity vs. image registration.基于图谱的自动小鼠脑图像分割再探:模型复杂度与图像配准。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jul;30(6):789-98. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.02.010. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
9
Local manifold learning for multiatlas segmentation: application to hippocampal segmentation in healthy population and Alzheimer's disease.用于多图谱分割的局部流形学习:在健康人群和阿尔茨海默病海马体分割中的应用
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2015 Oct;21(10):826-36. doi: 10.1111/cns.12415. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
10
Whole-body bone segmentation from MRI for PET/MRI attenuation correction using shape-based averaging.利用基于形状的平均法从MRI进行全身骨分割以用于PET/MRI衰减校正。
Med Phys. 2016 Nov;43(11):5848. doi: 10.1118/1.4963809.

本文引用的文献

1
Multi-atlas segmentation of biomedical images: A survey.生物医学图像的多图谱分割:一项综述。
Med Image Anal. 2015 Aug;24(1):205-219. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
2
An algorithm for optimal fusion of atlases with different labeling protocols.一种用于将具有不同标注协议的图谱进行最优融合的算法。
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 1;106:451-63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.031. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
3
Hierarchical performance estimation in the statistical label fusion framework.统计标签融合框架中的分层性能估计
Med Image Anal. 2014 Oct;18(7):1070-81. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
4
Automated abdominal multi-organ segmentation with subject-specific atlas generation.基于特定个体图谱生成的自动腹部多器官分割。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013 Sep;32(9):1723-30. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2265805. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
5
Non-local statistical label fusion for multi-atlas segmentation.非局部统计标签融合的多图谱分割。
Med Image Anal. 2013 Feb;17(2):194-208. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
6
Formulating spatially varying performance in the statistical fusion framework.在统计融合框架中制定空间变化的性能。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Jun;31(6):1326-36. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2190992. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
7
Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation.基于补丁的分割使用专家先验:在海马体和脑室分割中的应用。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):940-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.018. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
8
Label fusion in atlas-based segmentation using a selective and iterative method for performance level estimation (SIMPLE).基于图谱的分割中的标签融合使用选择性和迭代方法进行性能水平估计 (SIMPLE)。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Dec;29(12):2000-8. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2057442. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
9
A generative model for image segmentation based on label fusion.基于标签融合的图像分割生成模型。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Oct;29(10):1714-29. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2050897. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
10
Defining the human hippocampus in cerebral magnetic resonance images--an overview of current segmentation protocols.在脑磁共振图像中定义人类海马体——当前分割方案概述
Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1185-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.019. Epub 2009 May 15.

多协议、多图谱统计融合:理论与应用

Multiprotocol, multiatlas statistical fusion: theory and application.

作者信息

Plassard Andrew J, Landman Bennett A

机构信息

Vanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.

Vanderbilt University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.

出版信息

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017 Jul;4(3):034002. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.034002. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.034002
PMID:28894761
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5572442/
Abstract

Multiatlas segmentation offers an exceedingly convenient process by which image segmentation tools can be created from a series of labeled atlases (i.e., raters). However, creation of the atlases is exceedingly time consuming and prone to shifts in clinical/research demands as anatomical definitions are refined, combined, or subdivided. Hence, a process by which atlases from distinct, but complementary, anatomical "protocols" could be combined would allow for greater innovation in structural analysis and efficiency of data (re)use. Recent innovation in protocol fusion has shown that propagation of information across distinct protocols is feasible. However, how to effectively include this information in simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) has been elusive. We present a generalization of the STAPLE framework to account for multiprotocol rater performance (i.e., accuracy of registered atlases). This approach, multiset STAPLE (MS-STAPLE), provides a statistical framework for combining label information from atlases that have been labeled with distinct protocols (i.e., whole brain versus subcortical) and is compatible with the current local, nonlocal, probabilistic, log-odds, and hierarchical innovations in STAPLE theory. Using the MS-STAPLE approach, information from a broad range of datasets can be combined so that each available dataset contributes in a spatially dependent manner to local labels. We evaluate the model in simulations and in the context of an experiment where an existing set of whole-brain labels (14 structures) is refined to include parcellation of subcortical structures (26 structures). In the empirical results, we see significant improvement in the Dice similarity coefficient when comparing MS-STAPLE to STAPLE and nonlocal MS-STAPLE to nonlocal STAPLE.

摘要

多图谱分割提供了一个极其便捷的过程,通过这个过程可以从一系列带标签的图谱(即评估者)创建图像分割工具。然而,创建图谱极其耗时,并且随着解剖学定义的细化、合并或细分,临床/研究需求容易发生变化。因此,一种能够将来自不同但互补的解剖“协议”的图谱进行合并的方法,将有助于在结构分析方面实现更大的创新,并提高数据(再)利用的效率。协议融合方面的最新创新表明,跨不同协议传播信息是可行的。然而,如何在同时真值和性能水平估计(STAPLE)中有效纳入这些信息一直难以捉摸。我们提出了STAPLE框架的一种推广形式,以考虑多协议评估者的性能(即配准图谱的准确性)。这种方法,即多集STAPLE(MS - STAPLE),提供了一个统计框架,用于合并来自用不同协议标记的图谱(即全脑图谱与皮层下图谱)的标签信息,并且与STAPLE理论中当前的局部、非局部、概率、对数几率和分层创新方法兼容。使用MS - STAPLE方法,可以合并来自广泛数据集的信息,以便每个可用数据集以空间依赖的方式对局部标签做出贡献。我们在模拟以及一个实验背景下对该模型进行评估,在该实验中,现有的一组全脑标签(14个结构)被细化以纳入皮层下结构的分割(26个结构)。在实证结果中,我们发现将MS - STAPLE与STAPLE进行比较,以及将非局部MS - STAPLE与非局部STAPLE进行比较时,Dice相似系数有显著提高。