• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展中国家土耳其乳腺癌筛查的成本效益:巴赫切希尔乳房X光筛查项目的结果

Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening in Turkey, a Developing Country: Results from Bahçeşehir Mammography Screening Project.

作者信息

Özmen Vahit, Gürdal Sibel Ö, Cabioğlu Neslihan, Özcinar Beyza, Özaydın A Nilüfer, Kayhan Arda, Arıbal Erkin, Sahin Cennet, Saip Pınar, Alagöz Oğuzhan

机构信息

Department of Surgery, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Departments of Surgery, Namık Kemal University School of Medicine, Tekirdağ, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Breast Health. 2017 Jul 1;13(3):117-122. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2017.3528. eCollection 2017 Jul.

DOI:10.5152/ejbh.2017.3528
PMID:28894850
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5544145/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We used the results from the first three screening rounds of Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project (BMSP), a 10-year (2009-2019) and the first organized population-based screening program implemented in a county of Istanbul, Turkey, to assess the potential cost-effectiveness of a population-based mammography screening program in Turkey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two screening strategies were compared: BMSP (includes three biennial screens for women between 40-69) and Turkish National Breast Cancer Registry Program (TNBCRP) which includes no organized population-based screening. Costs were estimated using direct data from the BMSP project and the reimbursement rates of Turkish Social Security Administration. The life-years saved by BMSP were estimated using the stage distribution observed with BMSP and TNBCRP.

RESULTS

A total of 67 women (out of 7234 screened women) were diagnosed with breast cancer in BMSP. The stage distribution for AJCC stages O, I, II, III, IV was 19.4%, 50.8%, 20.9%, 7.5%, 1.5% and 4.9%, 26.6%, 44.9%, 20.8%, 2.8% with BMSP and TNBCRP, respectively. The BMSP program is expected to save 279.46 life years over TNBCRP with an additional cost of $677.171, which implies an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $2.423 per saved life year. Since the ICER is smaller than the Gross Demostic Product (GDP) per capita in Turkey ($10.515 in 2014), BMSP program is highly cost-effective and remains cost-effective in the sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

Mammography screening may change the stage distribution of breast cancer in Turkey. Furthermore, an organized population-based screening program may be cost-effective in Turkey and in other developing countries. More research is needed to better estimate life-years saved with screening and further validate the findings of our study.

摘要

目的

我们利用巴赫切希尔乳腺钼靶筛查项目(BMSP)前三轮筛查的结果,该项目为期10年(2009 - 2019年),是在土耳其伊斯坦布尔一个县实施的首个有组织的基于人群的筛查项目,以评估土耳其基于人群的乳腺钼靶筛查项目的潜在成本效益。

材料与方法

比较了两种筛查策略:BMSP(包括对40 - 69岁女性进行三次两年一次的筛查)和土耳其国家乳腺癌登记项目(TNBCRP),后者不包括有组织的基于人群的筛查。成本使用BMSP项目的直接数据和土耳其社会保障局的报销率进行估算。通过BMSP观察到的分期分布和TNBCRP估算BMSP节省的生命年数。

结果

在BMSP中,共7234名接受筛查的女性中有67名被诊断患有乳腺癌。AJCC分期0、I、II、III、IV期的分布在BMSP中分别为19.4%、50.8%、20.9%、7.5%、1.5%,在TNBCRP中分别为4.9%、26.6%、44.9%、20.8%、2.8%。预计BMSP项目比TNBCRP多挽救279.46个生命年,额外成本为677171美元,这意味着每挽救一个生命年的增量成本效益比(ICER)为2423美元。由于ICER小于土耳其人均国内生产总值(2014年为10515美元),BMSP项目具有很高的成本效益,并且在敏感性分析中仍然具有成本效益。

结论

乳腺钼靶筛查可能会改变土耳其乳腺癌的分期分布。此外,有组织的基于人群的筛查项目在土耳其和其他发展中国家可能具有成本效益。需要更多研究来更好地估算筛查挽救的生命年数,并进一步验证我们研究的结果。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening in Turkey, a Developing Country: Results from Bahçeşehir Mammography Screening Project.发展中国家土耳其乳腺癌筛查的成本效益:巴赫切希尔乳房X光筛查项目的结果
Eur J Breast Health. 2017 Jul 1;13(3):117-122. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2017.3528. eCollection 2017 Jul.
2
Bahcesehir long-term population-based screening compared to National Breast Cancer Registry Data: effectiveness of screening in an emerging country.巴希切希尔基于人群的长期筛查与国家乳腺癌登记数据的比较:新兴国家筛查的效果。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021 Mar;27(2):157-163. doi: 10.5152/dir.2021.20486.
3
4
Successful first round results of a Turkish breast cancer screening program with mammography in Bahcesehir, Istanbul.在伊斯坦布尔巴赫切希尔开展的土耳其乳腺癌钼靶筛查项目首轮取得成功。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(4):1693-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.4.1693.
5
Program-specific cost-effectiveness analysis: breast cancer screening policies for a safety-net program.特定项目成本效益分析:为一个安全网项目制定的乳腺癌筛查政策。
Value Health. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(6):932-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.013.
6
The National Cancer Screening Program for breast cancer in the Republic of Korea: is it cost-effective?大韩民国的国家乳腺癌筛查计划:它具有成本效益吗?
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(3):2059-65. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.3.2059.
7
Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.发展中国家的乳腺癌筛查政策:印度的成本效益分析
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 17;100(18):1290-300. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn292. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Three Rounds of Mammography Breast Cancer Screening in Iranian Women.伊朗女性三轮乳腺钼靶乳腺癌筛查的成本效益分析
Iran J Cancer Prev. 2016 Feb 23;9(1):e5443. doi: 10.17795/ijcp-5443. eCollection 2016 Feb.
9
Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in women on dialysis.透析女性乳腺癌筛查的成本效益
Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Nov;52(5):916-29. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.06.015. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
10
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of two breast cancer screening modalities in Shanghai, China].[中国上海两种乳腺癌筛查方式的成本效益分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;37(12):944-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Age and Education Influencing Willingness in Men to Recommend Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparative Study of University Personnel and Clinical Attendees.年龄与教育程度对男性推荐乳腺癌筛查意愿的影响:大学教职工与临床就诊者的比较研究
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2025 Aug 25;17:741-754. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S533079. eCollection 2025.
2
Analysis of Mammography BI-RADS Distribution and Follow-up Ultrasound Assessment: A Single-Center Study.乳腺钼靶影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分布分析及超声随访评估:一项单中心研究
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2025 Feb 6;17:115-122. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S481201. eCollection 2025.
3
Current Challenges and Perspectives in Breast Cancer in Elderly Women: The Senologic International Society (SIS) Survey.老年女性乳腺癌的当前挑战与展望:老年乳腺病国际协会(SIS)调查
Eur J Breast Health. 2023 Jul 3;19(3):201-209. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-5-1. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Breast Cancer in Asia: Incidence, Mortality, Early Detection, Mammography Programs, and Risk-Based Screening Initiatives.亚洲的乳腺癌:发病率、死亡率、早期检测、乳房X光检查项目以及基于风险的筛查举措
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 30;14(17):4218. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174218.
5
Economic evaluations of mammography to screen for breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.经济评估在低收入和中等收入国家进行乳腺癌筛查的乳腺 X 线摄影术:系统综述。
J Glob Health. 2022 Jul 16;12:04048. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04048.
6
Bahcesehir long-term population-based screening compared to National Breast Cancer Registry Data: effectiveness of screening in an emerging country.巴希切希尔基于人群的长期筛查与国家乳腺癌登记数据的比较:新兴国家筛查的效果。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021 Mar;27(2):157-163. doi: 10.5152/dir.2021.20486.
7
Poor Biological Factors and Prognosis of Interval Breast Cancers: Long-Term Results of Bahçeşehir (Istanbul) Breast Cancer Screening Project in Turkey.间期乳腺癌的不良生物学因素与预后:土耳其巴赫切希尔(伊斯坦布尔)乳腺癌筛查项目的长期结果
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Jul;6:1103-1113. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00145.
8
Cost- Effectiveness of Mammography Screening Program in a Resource-Limited Post-Soviet Country of Kazakhstan.哈萨克斯坦这一资源有限的后苏联国家乳腺X线筛查项目的成本效益
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Oct 1;20(10):3153-3160. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.10.3153.
9
Cost effectiveness of Gene Expression Profiling in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer in a Middle-Income Country, Turkey: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study.基因表达谱分析在中等收入国家土耳其早期乳腺癌患者中的成本效益:一项前瞻性多中心研究的结果
Eur J Breast Health. 2019 Jul 1;15(3):183-190. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4761. eCollection 2019 Jul.
10
Impact of The Method of Diagnosis on The Stage of Breast Carcinoma.诊断方法对乳腺癌分期的影响。
Eur J Breast Health. 2018 Oct 1;14(4):225-228. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2018.3870. eCollection 2018 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast Cancer in Turkey: Clinical and Histopathological Characteristics (Analysis of 13.240 Patients).土耳其的乳腺癌:临床和组织病理学特征(对13240例患者的分析)
J Breast Health. 2014 Apr 1;10(2):98-105. doi: 10.5152/tjbh.2014.1988. eCollection 2014 Apr.
2
Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.美国不同乳腺癌筛查策略相关获益与危害的协同建模
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):215-25. doi: 10.7326/M15-1536. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
3
International Consortium on Mammographic Density: Methodology and population diversity captured across 22 countries.国际乳腺密度联盟:22个国家的方法学与人群多样性
Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;40:141-51. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
4
Cancer Models and Real-world Data: Better Together.癌症模型与真实世界数据:携手共进,效果更佳。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Nov 3;108(2). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv316. Print 2016 Feb.
5
Cancer Incidence in Five Continents: Inclusion criteria, highlights from Volume X and the global status of cancer registration.《五大洲癌症发病率》:纳入标准、第十卷要点及全球癌症登记现状。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Nov 1;137(9):2060-71. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29670.
6
Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts.数字化乳腺钼靶联合断层合成筛查对乳腺致密女性的比较效果
Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):772-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141237. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
7
Factors affecting breast cancer treatment delay in Turkey: a study from Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Societies.影响土耳其乳腺癌治疗延迟的因素:来自土耳其乳腺疾病协会联合会的一项研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Feb;25(1):9-14. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku086. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
8
Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening for breast cancer in a low socioeconomic group of Iranian women.伊朗低社会经济群体女性乳腺癌钼靶筛查的成本效益
Arch Iran Med. 2014 Apr;17(4):241-5.
9
Successful first round results of a Turkish breast cancer screening program with mammography in Bahcesehir, Istanbul.在伊斯坦布尔巴赫切希尔开展的土耳其乳腺癌钼靶筛查项目首轮取得成功。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(4):1693-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.4.1693.
10
Breast cancer statistics, 2013.乳腺癌统计数据,2013 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):52-62. doi: 10.3322/caac.21203. Epub 2013 Oct 1.