• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0 用于轻度创伤性脑损伤的初步验证。

Preliminary Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

机构信息

1 Concussion Clinic, Canterbury District Health Board, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch , Burwood Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand .

2 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, and Home Base, A Red Sox Foundation and Massachusetts General Hospital Program , Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2017 Dec 1;34(23):3256-3261. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5234. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2017.5234
PMID:28895491
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the reliability, factor structure, and validity of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0 12 item version) in a sample of patients who were slow to recover from a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Participants were 79 adults with mTBI recruited from one of four specialty outpatient clinics in Vancouver, Canada. The WHODAS 2.0 12 item version is a disease-nonspecific measure of disability representing six International Classification of Disability, Functioning, and Health activity and participation domains including cognition, mobility, self-care, interpersonal functioning, life activities, and participation. Results of analyses showed that the WHODAS 2.0 had high internal consistency and adequate construct and concurrent validity. A three factor structure emerged in this sample. The scale differentiated between patients with good and those with poor outcomes based on post-concussion syndrome, psychiatric, and pain status. Participants with multiple comorbidities reported the most disability on the WHODAS. Concurrent validity was also supported by lower WHODAS scores in participants who had returned to work versus those who had not. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the psychometric properties of the WHODAS 2.0 in a sample of people with mTBI. In summary, the WHODAS was sensitive to post-concussion syndrome after mTBI, as well as to health conditions that commonly co-occur with mTBI (e.g., mental health problems and chronic pain).

摘要

本研究旨在检验世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS 2.0 12 项版本)在轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后恢复缓慢的患者样本中的信度、因子结构和效度。参与者为 79 名来自加拿大温哥华的四个专科门诊之一的 mTBI 患者。WHODAS 2.0 12 项版本是一种非疾病特异性的残疾衡量标准,代表了国际残疾、功能和健康分类的六个活动和参与领域,包括认知、移动、自理、人际交往、生活活动和参与。分析结果表明,WHODAS 2.0 具有较高的内部一致性和充分的结构和同时效度。在这个样本中出现了三个因子结构。该量表根据脑震荡后综合征、精神和疼痛状况将患者分为预后良好和预后不良的两组。患有多种合并症的患者在 WHODAS 上报告的残疾程度最高。同时,WHODAS 得分较低的参与者已返回工作,而未返回工作的参与者也支持了同时效度。据我们所知,这是第一项在 mTBI 患者样本中评估 WHODAS 2.0 的心理测量特性的研究。总之,WHODAS 对 mTBI 后的脑震荡后综合征以及与 mTBI 常见的共病状况(如心理健康问题和慢性疼痛)敏感。

相似文献

1
Preliminary Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0 用于轻度创伤性脑损伤的初步验证。
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Dec 1;34(23):3256-3261. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5234. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
2
Rasch analysis of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in a mild traumatic brain injury sample.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0在轻度创伤性脑损伤样本中的拉什分析。
Brain Inj. 2020 Apr 15;34(5):610-618. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1729417. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
3
Validation of the 36-item and 12-item self-report World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.验证 36 项和 12 项自我报告世界卫生组织残疾评估表第二版(WHODAS-II)在自闭症谱系障碍个体中的适用性。
Autism Res. 2019 Jul;12(7):1101-1111. doi: 10.1002/aur.2115. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
4
Comparison of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation with the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury.与 ICF 参与和活动筛查量表以及 WHO 残疾评估量表 II 相比,评估康复参与的乌得勒支量表在脊髓损伤患者中的应用比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.236. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
5
Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in people with severe mental disorders in rural Ethiopia.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表在埃塞俄比亚农村重症精神障碍患者中的效度验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 5;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0647-3.
6
Validation of the World Health Organization Assessment Schedule II Chinese Traditional Version (WHODAS II CT) in persons with disabilities and chronic illnesses for Chinese population.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版中文版(WHODAS II CT)在中国残疾人和慢性病患者中的效度验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1902-7. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.989336. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
7
Psychometric measurement properties of the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) evaluated among veterans with mild traumatic brain injury and behavioral health conditions.世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0(WHODAS)在患有轻度创伤性脑损伤和行为健康状况的退伍军人中的心理测量学测量特性评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 May;43(9):1313-1322. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1660914. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
8
Disability in bipolar I disorder: the 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.双相I型障碍中的残疾情况:世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(36项)
J Affect Disord. 2015 Mar 15;174:353-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.028. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
9
Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: implications for the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.为什么样本选择在探索性因素分析中很重要:对世界卫生组织残疾评估量表2.0(12项)的启示
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Mar 11;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0309-5.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Hebrew-speaking subjects with and without hand injury.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)在有手部损伤和无手部损伤的希伯来语使用者中的跨文化调适
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jun;39(12):1155-1161. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1189606. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation between postprandial hypotension and post-induction hypotension in the elderly: a protocol for a prospective cohort study.老年人餐后低血压与诱导后低血压之间的相关性:一项前瞻性队列研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 30;15(5):e095466. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095466.
2
Preliminary Feasibility of a Novel Mind-Body Program to Prevent Persistent Concussion Symptoms Among Young Adults With Anxiety: Nonrandomized Open Pilot Study.一种新型身心干预方案预防焦虑青年持续性脑震荡症状的初步可行性:非随机开放先导研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 8;8:e64540. doi: 10.2196/64540.
3
Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery After Concussion: A Live Video Program to Prevent Persistent Concussion Symptoms in Young Adults With Anxiety.
脑震荡后最佳恢复工具包的可行性随机对照试验:一个预防焦虑的年轻成年人持续性脑震荡症状的直播视频项目。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Apr;106(4):527-536. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.011. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
4
Graded Exposure Therapy for Fear Avoidance Behaviour After Concussion (GET FAB): protocol for a multisite Canadian randomised controlled trial.分级暴露疗法治疗脑震荡后回避行为恐惧(GET FAB):一项多中心加拿大随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 1;14(6):e086602. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086602.
5
The Sociodemographic Factors Related to Disability of Applicants of Welfare Benefits in Greece: A Cross-Sectional Survey Based on the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0.希腊福利金申请人残疾相关的社会人口学因素:基于世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS)2.0的横断面调查
Cureus. 2024 Mar 6;16(3):e55614. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55614. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), Greek Version: A Cross-Sectional Study on Applicants of Welfare Benefits.12项世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS 2.0)希腊语版本的心理测量特性:一项针对福利金申请人的横断面研究
Cureus. 2023 Nov 9;15(11):e48588. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48588. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule versus Functional Independence Measure in Traumatic Brain Injury.世界卫生组织残疾评估表与创伤性脑损伤中的功能独立性测量。
J Rehabil Med. 2023 Nov 30;55:jrm16274. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.16274.
8
Effectiveness of a guideline implementation tool for supporting management of mental health complications after mild traumatic brain injury in primary care: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.轻度创伤性脑损伤后支持初级保健中精神健康并发症管理的指南实施工具的有效性:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 21;12(6):e062527. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062527.
9
Psychological assessment of individuals with Mal de Débarquement Syndrome.晕船综合征患者的心理评估。
J Neurol. 2022 Apr;269(4):2149-2161. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10767-4. Epub 2021 Sep 19.
10
A Live Video Mind-Body Treatment to Prevent Persistent Symptoms Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.一种预防轻度创伤性脑损伤后持续症状的实时视频身心治疗:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 14;10(1):e25746. doi: 10.2196/25746.