Psotta Rudolf, Abdollahipour Reza
1 Department of Natural Sciences in Kinanthropology, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Percept Mot Skills. 2017 Dec;124(6):1051-1068. doi: 10.1177/0031512517729951. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
The Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2nd Edition (MABC-2) is a test of motor development, widely used in clinical and research settings. To address which motor abilities are actually captured by the motor tasks in the two age versions of the MABC-2, the AB2 for 7- 10-year-olds and the AB3 for 11- 16-year-olds, we examined AB2 and AB3 factorial validity. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis (SPSS AMOS 22.0) on data from the test's standardization samples of children aged 7-10, n = 483, and 11-16, n = 674, in order to find the best fitting models. The covariance matrix of AB2 and AB3 fit a three-factor model that included tasks of manual dexterity, aiming and catching, and balance. However, factor analytic models fitting AB2 and AB3 did not involve the dynamic balance tasks of hopping with the better leg and hopping with the other leg; and the drawing trail showed very low factor validity. In sum, both AB2 and AB3 of the MABC-2 test are able to discriminate between the three specific motor abilities; but due to questionable psychometric quality, the drawing trail and hopping tasks should be modified to improve the construct validity for both age versions of the MABC-2.
儿童运动评估量表第二版(MABC - 2)是一项运动发育测试,广泛应用于临床和研究环境。为了确定MABC - 2两个年龄版本(适用于7 - 10岁儿童的AB2和适用于11 - 16岁儿童的AB3)中的运动任务实际所测量的运动能力,我们对AB2和AB3进行了因素效度分析。我们对来自该测试7 - 10岁标准化样本(n = 483)和11 - 16岁标准化样本(n = 674)的数据进行了验证性因素分析(使用SPSS AMOS 22.0),以找出最佳拟合模型。AB2和AB3的协方差矩阵符合一个三因素模型,该模型包括手部灵巧性、瞄准和接球以及平衡任务。然而,拟合AB2和AB3的因素分析模型未涉及单腿跳和双腿交替跳的动态平衡任务;并且画轨迹任务的因素效度非常低。总之,MABC - 2测试的AB2和AB3都能够区分三种特定的运动能力;但由于心理测量质量存疑,画轨迹和跳跃任务应进行修改,以提高MABC - 2两个年龄版本的结构效度。