Suppr超能文献

内侧颞叶硬化的诊断:磁共振成像定量分析的敏感性、特异性及预测价值

Diagnosis of mesial temporal sclerosis: sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging.

作者信息

Granados Sánchez Ana María, Orejuela Zapata Juan Felipe

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Fundación Valle de Lili, Colombia.

出版信息

Neuroradiol J. 2018 Feb;31(1):50-59. doi: 10.1177/1971400917731301. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

Abstract

In the diagnosis of mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of qualitative assessment using conventional magnetic resonance imaging are low, mainly in mild or bilateral atrophy. Quantitative analysis may improve this performance. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of quantitative analysis using the hippocampal volumetric index (HVI) and hippocampal asymmetry index (HAI) compared with qualitative assessment in the MTS diagnosis. Twenty-five patients diagnosed with MTS, and 25 healthy subjects underwent conventional magnetic resonance imaging. Hippocampal volumes were obtained using an automated software (FreeSurfer); HVI and HAI were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to obtain the optimal threshold values. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for qualitative analysis were 44.00%, 96.00%, 91.67% and 63.16%, respectively. In the quantitative analysis, a threshold value of K = 0.22 for HVI provided a sensitivity value of 76.00%, specificity value of 96.00%, PPV of 95.00% and NPV of 80.00%. A threshold value of K = 0.06 for HAI provided the minimum C1 and C2 errors, with a sensitivity value of 88.00%, specificity value of 100%, PPV of 100% and NPV of 89.30%. A statistically significant difference was observed for HAI ( P < 0.0001), and ipsilateral HVI (left MTS, P = 0.0152; right MTS, P < 0.0001), between MTS and healthy groups. The HVI and HAI, both individually and in conjunction, improved the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of MTS compared to the qualitative analysis and other quantitative techniques. The HAI is highly accurate in the diagnosis of unilateral MTS, whereas the HVI may be better for bilateral MTS cases.

摘要

在颞叶内侧硬化(MTS)的诊断中,使用传统磁共振成像进行定性评估的敏感性、特异性和预测值较低,主要体现在轻度或双侧萎缩的情况。定量分析可能会改善这种情况。我们评估了使用海马体积指数(HVI)和海马不对称指数(HAI)进行定量分析与定性评估相比在MTS诊断中的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。25例被诊断为MTS的患者和25名健康受试者接受了传统磁共振成像检查。使用自动化软件(FreeSurfer)获取海马体积;计算HVI和HAI。进行受试者操作特征曲线分析以获得最佳阈值。计算敏感性、特异性和预测值。定性分析的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为44.00%、96.00%、91.67%和63.16%。在定量分析中,HVI的K = 0.22阈值时,敏感性值为76.00%,特异性值为96.00%,PPV为95.00%,NPV为80.00%。HAI的K = 0.06阈值时,C1和C2误差最小,敏感性值为88.00%,特异性值为100%,PPV为100%,NPV为89.30%。在MTS组和健康组之间,观察到HAI(P < 0.0001)以及同侧HVI(左侧MTS,P = 0.0152;右侧MTS,P < 0.0001)存在统计学显著差异。与定性分析和其他定量技术相比,HVI和HAI单独或联合使用均提高了磁共振成像在MTS诊断中的敏感性、特异性和预测值。HAI在单侧MTS的诊断中高度准确,而HVI可能更适用于双侧MTS病例。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Radiologic Classification of Hippocampal Sclerosis in Epilepsy.癫痫中海马硬化的放射学分类。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 9;45(9):1185-1193. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8214.

本文引用的文献

2
Neuroimaging evaluation in refractory epilepsy.难治性癫痫的神经影像学评估
Neuroradiol J. 2015 Oct;28(5):529-35. doi: 10.1177/1971400915609344. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
6
Current management and surgical outcomes of medically intractable epilepsy.药物难治性癫痫的当前管理与手术疗效
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;115(12):2411-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.09.035. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
8
Update on the surgical treatment of epilepsy.癫痫的外科治疗进展。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2013 Apr;26(2):201-7. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835ef345.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验