Suppr超能文献

可穿戴传感器用于预测膝骨关节炎患者运动干预后的改善情况。

Wearable sensors to predict improvement following an exercise intervention in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Kobsar Dylan, Osis Sean T, Boyd Jeffrey E, Hettinga Blayne A, Ferber Reed

机构信息

Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.

Running Injury Clinic, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Sep 12;14(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0309-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Muscle strengthening exercises consistently demonstrate improvements in the pain and function of adults with knee osteoarthritis, but individual response rates can vary greatly. Identifying individuals who are more likely to respond is important in developing more efficient rehabilitation programs for knee osteoarthritis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if pre-intervention multi-sensor accelerometer data (e.g., back, thigh, shank, foot accelerometers) and patient reported outcome measures (e.g., pain, symptoms, function, quality of life) can retrospectively predict post-intervention response to a 6-week hip strengthening exercise intervention in a knee OA cohort.

METHODS

Thirty-nine adults with knee osteoarthritis completed a 6-week hip strengthening exercise intervention and were sub-grouped as Non-Responders, Low-Responders, or High-Responders following the intervention based on their change in patient reported outcome measures. Pre-intervention multi-sensor accelerometer data recorded at the back, thigh, shank, and foot and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscale data were used as potential predictors of response in a discriminant analysis of principal components.

RESULTS

The thigh was the single best placement for classifying responder sub-groups (74.4%). Overall, the best combination of sensors was the back, thigh, and shank (81.7%), but a simplified two sensor solution using the back and thigh was not significantly different (80.0%; p = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

While three sensors were best able to identify responders, a simplified two sensor array at the back and thigh may be the most ideal configuration to provide clinicians with an efficient and relatively unobtrusive way to use to optimize treatment.

摘要

背景

肌肉强化锻炼一直显示出可改善成年膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛和功能,但个体反应率可能差异很大。识别更可能产生反应的个体对于制定更有效的膝骨关节炎康复计划很重要。因此,本研究的目的是确定干预前的多传感器加速度计数据(例如背部、大腿、小腿、足部加速度计)和患者报告的结局指标(例如疼痛、症状、功能、生活质量)是否可以回顾性预测膝骨关节炎队列中为期6周的髋部强化锻炼干预后的反应。

方法

39名成年膝骨关节炎患者完成了为期6周的髋部强化锻炼干预,并根据患者报告的结局指标变化在干预后分为无反应者、低反应者或高反应者亚组。在背部、大腿、小腿和足部记录的干预前多传感器加速度计数据以及膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分子量表数据被用作主成分判别分析中反应的潜在预测指标。

结果

大腿是区分反应者亚组的最佳单一放置部位(74.4%)。总体而言,传感器的最佳组合是背部、大腿和小腿(81.7%),但使用背部和大腿的简化双传感器解决方案差异不显著(80.0%;p = 0.27)。

结论

虽然三个传感器最能识别反应者,但背部和大腿的简化双传感器阵列可能是最理想的配置,可为临床医生提供一种有效且相对不引人注意的方式来优化治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95a5/5596963/7ace77f33d45/12984_2017_309_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验