• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索美国大学生样本中的基因计算技能。

Exploring Genetic Numeracy Skills in a Sample of U.S. University Students.

作者信息

Bergman Margo W, Goodson Patricia, Goltz Heather Honoré

机构信息

Milgard School of Business, University of Washington - Tacoma, Tacoma, WA, United States.

Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2017 Aug 29;5:229. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00229. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2017.00229
PMID:28900615
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5581811/
Abstract

Misconceptions concerning numerical genetic risk exist even within educated populations. To more fully characterize and understand the extent of these risk misunderstandings, which have large potential impact on clinical care, we analyzed the responses from 2,576 students enrolled at 2 Southwestern universities using the PGRID tool, a 138-item web-based survey comprising measures of understanding of genetics, genetic disease, and genetic risk. The primary purpose of this study was to characterize the intersection of risk perception and knowledge, termed genetic numeracy (GN). Additionally, we identify sociodemographic factors that might shape varying levels of GN skills within the study sample and explore the impact of GN on genetic testing intentions using both the Marascuilo procedure and logistic regression analysis. Despite having some college coursework or at least one college degree, most respondents lacked high-level aptitude in understanding genetic inheritance risk, especially with respect to recessive disorders. Prior education about genetics and biology, as well as exposure to biomedical models of genetics, was associated with higher GN levels; exposure to popular media models of genetics was inversely associated with higher GN levels. Differing GN levels affects genetic testing intentions. GN will become more relevant as genetic testing is increasingly incorporated into general clinical care.

摘要

即使在受过教育的人群中,关于数字遗传风险的误解也依然存在。为了更全面地描述和理解这些风险误解的程度(这些误解对临床护理有很大的潜在影响),我们使用PGRID工具分析了来自西南地区两所大学的2576名学生的回答。PGRID工具是一项基于网络的138项调查,包括对遗传学、遗传疾病和遗传风险的理解测量。本研究的主要目的是描述风险认知与知识的交叉点,即遗传数字能力(GN)。此外,我们确定了可能影响研究样本中不同水平GN技能的社会人口因素,并使用马腊斯奎洛程序和逻辑回归分析探讨了GN对基因检测意愿的影响。尽管大多数受访者有一些大学课程作业或至少拥有一个大学学位,但他们在理解遗传遗传风险方面缺乏高水平的能力,尤其是在隐性疾病方面。先前接受的遗传学和生物学教育,以及接触遗传学的生物医学模型,与较高的GN水平相关;接触遗传学的大众媒体模型与较高的GN水平呈负相关。不同的GN水平会影响基因检测意愿。随着基因检测越来越多地纳入普通临床护理,GN将变得更加重要。

相似文献

1
Exploring Genetic Numeracy Skills in a Sample of U.S. University Students.探索美国大学生样本中的基因计算技能。
Front Public Health. 2017 Aug 29;5:229. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00229. eCollection 2017.
2
Explanatory Models of Genetics and Genetic Risk among a Selected Group of Students.特定群体学生对遗传学和遗传风险的解释模型。
Front Public Health. 2016 Jun 6;4:111. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00111. eCollection 2016.
3
Knowledge of Genetics and Attitudes toward Genetic Testing among College Students in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯大学生的遗传学知识及对基因检测的态度
Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(5):260-8. doi: 10.1159/000446511. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
4
Sexual behavior, contraception, and risk among college students.大学生的性行为、避孕与风险
J Adolesc Health. 1999 Nov;25(5):336-43. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(99)00054-3.
5
Numeracy among trainees: are we preparing physicians for evidence-based medicine?受训者的计算能力:我们是否在为循证医学培养医生?
J Surg Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;71(2):211-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.07.013.
6
What are standardized literacy and numeracy tests testing? Evidence of the domain-general contributions to students' standardized educational test performance.标准化读写和计算测试测试的是什么?对学生标准化教育考试表现的领域一般性贡献的证据。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2017 Mar;87(1):108-122. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12138. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
7
Exploring objective and subjective numeracy at a population level: findings from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).探讨人口层面的客观和主观计算能力:来自 2007 年健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)的发现。
J Health Commun. 2013;18(2):192-205. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.688450. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
8
College tanning behaviors, attitudes, beliefs, and intentions: A systematic review of the literature.大学生晒黑行为、态度、信念和意图:文献系统综述。
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.029. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
9
The relationship between low perceived numeracy and cancer knowledge, beliefs, and affect.低感知数值能力与癌症知识、信念和情感之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 11;13(6):e0198992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198992. eCollection 2018.
10
Factors affecting student performance in an undergraduate genetics course.影响本科遗传学课程学生成绩的因素。
J Anim Sci. 2013 May;91(5):2438-43. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5839. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Impact of Simplified Language on a Patient-Facing Pharmacogenetic Report: A User Comprehension Study.评估简化语言对面向患者的药物遗传学报告的影响:一项用户理解研究。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jun 12;15(6):247. doi: 10.3390/jpm15060247.
2
Knowledge of genetics and attitudes toward genetic testing among university students in Indonesia.印度尼西亚大学生的遗传学知识及对基因检测的态度
J Community Genet. 2024 Aug;15(4):433-447. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00711-0. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
3
Are College Students Interested in Family Health History Education? A Large Needs Assessment Survey Study.大学生对家庭健康史教育感兴趣吗?一项大型需求评估调查研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;20(3):2596. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032596.
4
Factors Influencing Family Health History Collection among Young Adults: A Structural Equation Modeling.影响青年人群家族健康史采集的因素:结构方程建模研究
Genes (Basel). 2022 Mar 29;13(4):612. doi: 10.3390/genes13040612.
5
Evaluating co-created patient-facing materials to increase understanding of genetic test results.评估共同创作的面向患者的材料,以提高对基因检测结果的理解。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Apr;30(2):598-605. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1348. Epub 2020 Oct 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies for integrating personalized medicine into healthcare practice.将个性化医疗融入医疗实践的策略。
Per Med. 2017 Mar;14(2):141-152. doi: 10.2217/pme-2016-0064. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
2
Genomic translational research: Paving the way to individualized cardiac functional analyses and personalized cardiology.基因组转化研究:为个性化心脏功能分析和个性化心脏病学铺平道路。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:384-401. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.097. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
3
Primary care providers' experiences with and perceptions of personalized genomic medicine.初级医疗服务提供者对个性化基因组医学的体验与看法。
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Oct;62(10):e626-e635.
4
Influential Factors of Puerto Rican Mother-Child Communication About Sexual Health Topics.波多黎各母婴关于性健康话题交流的影响因素。
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Nov;20(11):2280-2290. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2041-x.
5
Explanatory Models of Genetics and Genetic Risk among a Selected Group of Students.特定群体学生对遗传学和遗传风险的解释模型。
Front Public Health. 2016 Jun 6;4:111. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00111. eCollection 2016.
6
Translating translational medicine into global health equity: What is needed?将转化医学转化为全球卫生公平:需要什么?
Appl Transl Genom. 2016 Mar 10;9:37-9. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2016.03.004. eCollection 2016 Jun.
7
The role of religious values in decisions about genetics and the public's health.宗教价值观在遗传学决策和公众健康方面所起的作用。
J Relig Health. 2014 Jun;53(3):702-14. doi: 10.1007/s10943-013-9814-y.
8
Risk-taking and social exclusion in adolescence: neural mechanisms underlying peer influences on decision-making.青少年时期的冒险行为和社会排斥:同伴对决策影响的神经机制。
Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 15;82:23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.061. Epub 2013 May 24.
9
Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here.将基因组医学付诸临床实践:未来已来。
Genet Med. 2013 Apr;15(4):258-67. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.157. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
10
Smokers: at risk for prostate cancer but unlikely to screen.烟民:患前列腺癌风险高,但不太可能进行筛查。
Addict Behav. 2012 Jun;37(6):736-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.02.006. Epub 2012 Feb 15.