Dobie T G, May J G, Fischer W D, Elder S T, Kubitz K A
Motion Sciences Department, Naval Biodynamics Laboratory, New Orleans, LA 70189-0407.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1987 Sep;58(9 Pt 2):A34-41.
This report concerns the use of two methods of training subjects to tolerate visually-induced motion sickness (VMS). Sixteen subjects were selected on the basis of their response to a motion sickness history questionnaire and assigned to one of four groups on the basis of their ability to tolerate visually-induced motion (VM). One group received 10 sessions of confidence building and desensitization training (BT); a second group received 10 sessions of EMG and temperature biofeedback (FB); a third group received 10 sessions of BT and 10 sessions of FB (BTFB); and a fourth group received no treatment (C). The results indicated that the BT and BTFB groups exhibited significant increases in tolerance to VM when pretreatment measures were compared to posttreatment measures, while no significant differences in pre-post measures were observed in the FB or C groups. A similar pattern emerged from the symptomatology data.
本报告涉及使用两种方法训练受试者耐受视觉诱发晕动病（VMS）。根据受试者对晕动病史问卷的回答选择了16名受试者，并根据他们耐受视觉诱发运动（VM）的能力将其分配到四个组中的一组。一组接受了10次建立信心和脱敏训练（BT）；第二组接受了10次肌电图和温度生物反馈（FB）；第三组接受了10次BT和10次FB（BTFB）；第四组未接受治疗（C）。结果表明，与治疗后测量值相比，BT组和BTFB组在VM耐受性方面有显著提高，而FB组或C组在治疗前后测量值上未观察到显著差异。症状学数据也呈现出类似的模式。
