• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“预激”对非去极化神经肌肉阻滞剂效能的影响。

Influence of "priming" on the potency of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents.

作者信息

Brady M M, Mirakhur R K, Gibson F M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthetics, Queen's University of Belfast, N. Ireland.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1987 Oct;59(10):1245-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/59.10.1245.

DOI:10.1093/bja/59.10.1245
PMID:2890366
Abstract

Dose-response curves have been constructed to determine the ED50 and ED95 (doses required to produce a 50% and a 95% block, respectively) following administration of a small "priming" dose of atracurium 50 micrograms kg-1, vecuronium 10 micrograms kg-1 or pancuronium 10 micrograms kg-1. The myoneural blockers were administered subsequently as a single bolus. The results were compared with previously published work on these drugs, in which no priming dose had been administered. The respective ED50 and ED95 values in the primed and control groups were 122 and 126 micrograms kg-1 and 208 and 226 micrograms kg-1, respectively, for atracurium; 26 and 23 micrograms kg-1 and 42 and 39 micrograms kg-1, respectively, for vecuronium; and 31 and 30 micrograms kg-1 and 56 and 60 micrograms kg-1, respectively, for pancuronium. The values showed no significant differences between the respective primed and control groups. Contrary to previous suggestions, our results show no enhancement of blockade when these drugs were administered in divided doses.

摘要

构建剂量 - 反应曲线以确定在给予小剂量“预充”剂量的阿曲库铵50微克/千克、维库溴铵10微克/千克或泮库溴铵10微克/千克后,产生50%和95%阻滞(分别)所需的ED50和ED95(剂量)。随后将肌松药作为单次推注给药。将结果与先前发表的关于这些药物的研究进行比较,在先前的研究中未给予预充剂量。对于阿曲库铵,预充组和对照组各自的ED50和ED95值分别为122和126微克/千克以及208和226微克/千克;对于维库溴铵,分别为26和23微克/千克以及42和39微克/千克;对于泮库溴铵,分别为31和30微克/千克以及56和60微克/千克。这些值在各自的预充组和对照组之间没有显示出显著差异。与先前的建议相反,我们的结果表明,当这些药物分剂量给药时,没有增强阻滞作用。

相似文献

1
Influence of "priming" on the potency of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents.“预激”对非去极化神经肌肉阻滞剂效能的影响。
Br J Anaesth. 1987 Oct;59(10):1245-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/59.10.1245.
2
Comparison of cumulative and single bolus dose techniques for determining the potency of vecuronium.用于确定维库溴铵效力的累积剂量和单次推注剂量技术的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 1985 Nov;57(11):1060-2. doi: 10.1093/bja/57.11.1060.
3
Atracurium and vecuronium: effect of dose on the time of onset.阿曲库铵和维库溴铵:剂量对起效时间的影响。
Br J Anaesth. 1986 Jun;58(6):620-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/58.6.620.
4
Administration of vecuronium, atracurium and pancuronium in divided doses: effect on onset and duration of action.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1988 Jul;5(4):243-9.
5
Neuromuscular blocking effects of atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium during bolus and infusion administration.阿曲库铵、维库溴铵和泮库溴铵在单次注射和持续输注给药期间的神经肌肉阻滞作用。
Br J Anaesth. 1985 Nov;57(11):1052-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/57.11.1052.
6
Neuromuscular block: atracurium and vecuronium compared and combined.神经肌肉阻滞:阿曲库铵与维库溴铵的比较及联合应用
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1985 Mar;2(1):29-37.
7
Clinical comparison of atracurium and vecuronium (Org NC 45).阿曲库铵与维库溴铵(ORG NC 45)的临床比较。
Br J Anaesth. 1983 Feb;55(2):125-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/55.2.125.
8
Accelerated onset of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs: pancuronium, atracurium and vecuronium. A comparison with succinylcholine.非去极化神经肌肉阻滞药物的起效加速:泮库溴铵、阿曲库铵和维库溴铵。与琥珀胆碱的比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1988 Jan;5(1):15-21.
9
[Profile of the effect of succinylcholine after pre-curarization with atracurium, vecuronium or pancuronium].[阿曲库铵、维库溴铵或泮库溴铵预箭毒化后琥珀酰胆碱的效应概况]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1996 Jun;31(5):304-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995925.
10
Vecuronium and d-tubocurarine combination: potentiation of effect.维库溴铵与筒箭毒碱联合使用:效应增强。
Anesth Analg. 1985 Jul;64(7):711-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Onset of action of relaxants.松弛剂的起效时间。
Can J Anaesth. 1988 May;35(3 ( Pt 2)):S52-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03026928.