Abraham Jasson T, Nguyen Anson V, Weber Robert A
From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Healthcare, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, TX.
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Feb;80(2):164-170. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001199.
There has been a relatively rapid increase in the number and size of "integrated" residency programs in plastic surgery (PS) over the past decade. The objective of this study is to evaluate trends of US senior applicants of PS compared with other surgical specialties from 2007 to 2016.
Data were obtained from "NRMP: Main Residency Match" and from "NRMP: Charting Outcomes in the Match." Frequencies, percentages, and proportions were calculated for categorical variables. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were calculated to evaluate the relationship of Alpha Omega Alpha membership and match success.
The overall National Resident Matching Program match rate ranged from 93.1% to 95.1%, but rates were lower for surgical specialties, ranging from 74.7% to 86.6% in 2016. From 2008 to 2016, PS had a relatively high growth rate in the number of positions (65.2%) from 2008 to 2016. Matched PS and Otolaryngology applicants routinely had the highest mean United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores. Alpha Omega Alpha membership has a significant impact on successfully matching into a surgical specialty (P < 0.1). Matched applicants of surgical subspecialties (PS, Otolaryngology, orthopedics, and neurosurgery) had similar mean number of research, work, and volunteer experiences. However, PS and neurosurgery matched applicants had notably higher mean research productivity.
The rapid increase in the number of positions in PS residency training has not resulted in a decrease in caliber of matched applicants, even though match rates have dramatically increased. Currently, PS continues to attract and successfully match highly qualified applicants, but other surgical specialties have increasingly similar board scores and mean number of extracurricular experiences.
在过去十年中,整形外科(PS)“综合”住院医师培训项目的数量和规模增长相对较快。本研究的目的是评估2007年至2016年美国整形外科高级申请者与其他外科专业相比的趋势。
数据来自“NRMP:主要住院医师匹配”和“NRMP:匹配结果图表”。计算分类变量的频率、百分比和比例。计算95%置信区间的比值比,以评估αΩα成员资格与匹配成功之间的关系。
全国住院医师匹配计划的总体匹配率在93.1%至95.1%之间,但外科专业的匹配率较低,2016年在74.7%至86.6%之间。从2008年到2016年,整形外科的职位数量增长率相对较高(65.2%)。匹配的整形外科和耳鼻喉科申请者通常在美国医学执照考试第一步和第二步临床知识考试中平均得分最高。αΩα成员资格对成功匹配到外科专业有显著影响(P<0.1)。外科亚专业(整形外科、耳鼻喉科、骨科和神经外科)的匹配申请者的研究、工作和志愿者经历的平均数量相似。然而,整形外科和神经外科的匹配申请者的平均研究生产力明显更高。
尽管匹配率大幅提高,但整形外科住院医师培训职位数量的快速增加并未导致匹配申请者的质量下降。目前,整形外科继续吸引并成功匹配高素质的申请者,但其他外科专业的委员会分数和课外经历的平均数量越来越相似。