• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析 2050 年美国汽车和能源部门减少 70%的 CO 排放的成本和时间框架。

Analysis of Costs and Time Frame for Reducing CO Emissions by 70% in the U.S. Auto and Energy Sectors by 2050.

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Oct 3;51(19):10932-10942. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01295. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.7b01295
PMID:28910087
Abstract

Using a least-cost optimization framework, it is shown that unless emissions reductions beyond those already in place begin at the latest by 2025 (±2 years) for the U.S. automotive sector, and by 2026 (-3 years) for the U.S. electric sector, 2050 targets to achieve necessary within-sector preventative CO emissions reductions of 70% or more relative to 2010 will be infeasible. The analysis finds no evidence to justify delaying climate action in the name of reducing technological costs. Even without considering social and environmental damage costs, delaying aggressive climate action does not reduce CO abatement costs even under the most optimistic trajectories for improvements in fuel efficiencies, demand, and technology costs in the U.S. auto and electric sectors. In fact, the abatement cost for both sectors is found to increase sharply with every year of delay beyond 2020. When further considering reasonable limits to technology turnover, retirements, and new capacity additions, these costs would be higher, and the feasible time frame for initiating successful climate action on the 70% by 2050 target would be shorter, perhaps having passed already. The analysis also reveals that optimistic business-as-usual scenarios in the U.S. will, conservatively, release 79-108 billion metric tons of CO. This could represent up to 13% of humanity's remaining carbon budget through 2050.

摘要

采用最低成本优化框架,结果表明,除非美国汽车行业最迟在 2025 年(±2 年)、美国电力行业最迟在 2026 年(-3 年)开始实施超出当前减排水平的减排措施,否则到 2050 年实现相对于 2010 年 70%以上的部门内预防性 CO 减排目标将是不可行的。分析结果没有发现任何证据表明,为了降低技术成本,可以推迟采取气候行动。即使不考虑社会和环境损害成本,在考虑到美国汽车和电力行业提高燃油效率、需求和技术成本的最乐观轨迹的情况下,推迟采取积极的气候行动也不会降低 CO 减排成本。事实上,这两个部门的减排成本都会随着 2020 年以后每年的延迟而急剧增加。当进一步考虑技术更替、退役和新增产能的合理限制时,这些成本将会更高,而在 2050 年实现 70%减排目标的成功气候行动的可行时间框架将会更短,也许已经过去了。分析还表明,美国乐观的按部就班情景将保守地释放 790-1080 亿吨 CO。这可能占人类到 2050 年剩余碳预算的 13%。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Costs and Time Frame for Reducing CO Emissions by 70% in the U.S. Auto and Energy Sectors by 2050.分析 2050 年美国汽车和能源部门减少 70%的 CO 排放的成本和时间框架。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Oct 3;51(19):10932-10942. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01295. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
2
Electricity from fossil fuels without CO2 emissions: assessing the costs of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration in U.S. electricity markets.来自化石燃料且无二氧化碳排放的电力:评估美国电力市场中二氧化碳捕集与封存的成本。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001 Oct;51(10):1452-9. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2001.10464370.
3
Regional air quality management aspects of climate change: impact of climate mitigation options on regional air emissions.气候变化的区域空气质量管理方面:气候缓解措施对区域空气排放的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 21;49(8):5170-7. doi: 10.1021/es505159z. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
4
Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target.现有能源基础设施的承诺排放量危及 1.5°C 气候目标。
Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7769):373-377. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1364-3. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
5
Reducing U.S. residential energy use and CO2 emissions: how much, how soon, and at what cost?减少美国居民能源使用和二氧化碳排放:减排多少、多快以及代价如何?
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Mar 19;47(6):2502-11. doi: 10.1021/es303688k. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
6
Reducing CO Emissions from U.S. Steel Consumption by 70% by 2050.到 2050 年将美国钢铁消费的 CO 排放量减少 70%。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Nov 17;54(22):14598-14608. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c04321. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
7
Coordinated EV adoption: double-digit reductions in emissions and fuel use for $40/vehicle-year.协调电动汽车的推广应用:排放量和燃料使用量减少两位数,每辆车每年节省 40 美元。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Sep 17;47(18):10703-7. doi: 10.1021/es4016926. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
8
No COVID-19 climate silver lining in the US power sector.美国电力部门没有 COVID-19 带来的气候利好。
Nat Commun. 2021 Aug 3;12(1):4675. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24959-z.
9
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).减少废弃物产生的全球温室气体排放:政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第四次评估报告的结论与策略。第三工作组(减缓气候变化)
Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433.
10
Open Source Energy System Modeling Using Break-Even Costs to Inform State-Level Policy: A North Carolina Case Study.利用盈亏平衡成本进行开源能源系统建模以提供州级政策信息:北卡罗来纳州案例研究。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jan 21;54(2):665-676. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04184. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic analysis of the costs and environmental impacts of critical materials recovery from hybrid electric vehicle batteries in the U.S.美国混合动力电动汽车电池关键材料回收的成本与环境影响的系统分析
iScience. 2022 Aug 5;25(9):104830. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104830. eCollection 2022 Sep 16.
2
Rethinking electric vehicle subsidies, rediscovering energy efficiency.重新思考电动汽车补贴,重新发现能源效率。
Energy Policy. 2020 Nov;146:111760. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111760. Epub 2020 Sep 3.