Schramm Dirk, Yu Yin, Wiemers Anna, Vossen Christina, Snijders Deborah, Krivec Uros, Priftis Kostas, Eber Ernst, Pohunek Petr
Department of General Pediatrics, Neonatology, and Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017 Nov;52(11):1502-1508. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23823. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
Eighteen years have passed since the last European survey concerning practices in pediatric bronchoscopy was conducted. Therefore, members of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) Pediatric Bronchology Group 7.7, initiated the "European Pediatric Bronchoscopy Survey 2015," which aimed to assess the current state of this evolving diagnostic and therapeutic procedure in the field of pediatric respiratory medicine.
A questionnaire was sent to national representatives of 44 European countries with the request to distribute it to all centers performing pediatric bronchoscopies. Questions concerned the following areas of interest: number of procedures, personnel and technical equipment, indications, complications, anesthesia, and diagnostic possibilities.
In total, 198 European centers from 33 European countries participated in the survey. From 2012 to 2014 a total of 57 145 bronchoscopies were reported. Both flexible and rigid techniques were available at most of the centers. The most frequently mentioned indications were suspected aspiration, infection, radiographic abnormalities, airway obstruction, and cough. Hypoxemia, airway obstruction, and cough were the most common complications mentioned, followed by airway hemorrhage. Most centers were able to perform bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and endobronchial biopsies and some performed more special procedures, such as transbronchial biopsies. Interventions like balloon dilation, laser procedures, or stent placement were less common and rarely available.
Compared to the 1997 survey, our results suggest that pediatric bronchoscopy has become more widely available and established in Europe. Different practices in individual countries suggest that more effort should be put on standardizing bronchoscopic procedures across Europe.
自上次进行欧洲儿科支气管镜检查实践调查以来,已经过去了18年。因此,欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)儿科支气管学组7.7的成员发起了“2015年欧洲儿科支气管镜检查调查”,旨在评估这一不断发展的儿科呼吸医学诊断和治疗程序的当前状况。
向44个欧洲国家的国家代表发送了一份问卷,要求将其分发给所有进行儿科支气管镜检查的中心。问题涉及以下感兴趣的领域:检查数量、人员和技术设备、适应症、并发症、麻醉和诊断可能性。
共有来自33个欧洲国家的198个欧洲中心参与了此次调查。2012年至2014年期间共报告了57145例支气管镜检查。大多数中心都具备柔性和刚性技术。最常提及的适应症是疑似误吸、感染、影像学异常、气道阻塞和咳嗽。低氧血症、气道阻塞和咳嗽是提及最多的常见并发症,其次是气道出血。大多数中心能够进行支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)和支气管内活检,一些中心还进行了更特殊的操作,如经支气管活检。球囊扩张、激光手术或支架置入等干预措施则较少见且很少开展。
与1997年的调查相比,我们的结果表明儿科支气管镜检查在欧洲已变得更加普及且得到确立。各个国家的不同做法表明,应更加努力地在全欧洲规范支气管镜检查程序。