餐后高分辨率阻抗测压可明确质子泵抑制剂治疗无应答的机制。
Postprandial High-Resolution Impedance Manometry Identifies Mechanisms of Nonresponse to Proton Pump Inhibitors.
机构信息
Department of Medicine, Anschutz School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
出版信息
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb;16(2):211-218.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Recognition of rumination and supragastric belching is often delayed as symptoms may be mistakenly attributed to gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, distinct from gastroesophageal reflux disease, rumination and supragastric belching are more responsive to behavioral interventions than to acid-suppressive and antireflux therapies. Postprandial high-resolution impedance manometry (PP-HRIM) is an efficient method to identify rumination and belches. We investigated the distribution of postprandial profiles determined by PP-HRIM, and identified patient features associated with postprandial profiles among patients with nonresponse to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).
METHODS
We performed a retrospective analysis of PP-HRIM studies performed on 94 adults (mean age, 50.6 y; 62% female) evaluated for PPI nonresponsiveness at an esophageal referral center, from January 2010 through May 2016. Following a standard esophageal manometry protocol, patients ingested a solid refluxogenic test meal (identified by patients as one that induces symptoms) with postprandial monitoring up to 90 minutes (median, 50 min). Patients were assigned to 1 of 4 postprandial profiles: normal; reflux only (>6 transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs)/h); supragastric belch (>2 supragastric belches/h), with or without TLESR; or rumination (≥1 rumination episode/h) with or without TLESR and supragastric belching. The primary outcome was postprandial profile.
RESULTS
Of the study participants, 24% had a normal postprandial profile, 14% had a reflux-only profile, 42% had a supragastric belch profile, and 20% had a rumination profile. In multinomial regression analysis, the rumination group most frequently presented with regurgitation, the supragastric belch and rumination groups were younger in age, and the reflux-only group had a lower esophagogastric junction contractile integral. The number of weakly acidic reflux events measured by impedance-pH monitoring in patients receiving PPI therapy was significantly associated with frequency of rumination episodes and supragastric belches.
CONCLUSIONS
In a retrospective analysis of 94 nonresponders to PPI therapy evaluated by PP-HRIM, we detected an abnormal postprandial pattern in 76% of cases: 42% of these were characterized as supragastric belching, 20% as rumination, and 14% as reflux only. Age, esophagogastric junction contractility, impedance-pH profiles, and symptom presentation differed significantly among groups. PP-HRIM can be used in the clinic to evaluate mechanisms of PPI nonresponse.
背景与目的
由于症状可能被误认为是胃食管反流病,因此常延迟对反刍和胃上嗳气的识别。然而,与胃食管反流病不同,反刍和胃上嗳气对行为干预的反应优于抑酸和抗反流治疗。餐后高分辨率阻抗测压(PP-HRIM)是识别反刍和嗳气的有效方法。我们研究了通过 PP-HRIM 确定的餐后谱的分布,并确定了质子泵抑制剂(PPI)无反应患者中与餐后谱相关的患者特征。
方法
我们对 2010 年 1 月至 2016 年 5 月在食管转诊中心接受 PPI 无反应评估的 94 名成年人(平均年龄 50.6 岁;62%为女性)进行了 PP-HRIM 研究的回顾性分析。按照标准食管测压方案,患者在餐后监测至 90 分钟(中位数 50 分钟)内摄入固体反流性试验餐(由患者确定能引起症状的食物)。患者被分为 4 种餐后谱之一:正常;仅反流(>6 次短暂性食管下括约肌松弛(TLESR)/h);胃上嗳气(>2 次胃上嗳气/h),伴或不伴 TLESR;或反刍(≥1 次反刍/h),伴或不伴 TLESR 和胃上嗳气。主要结局是餐后谱。
结果
在研究参与者中,24%的人餐后谱正常,14%的人仅有反流,42%的人胃上嗳气,20%的人反刍。在多项分类回归分析中,反刍组最常出现胃食管反流,胃上嗳气和反刍组年龄较小,而仅有反流组的食管胃结合部收缩积分较低。在接受 PPI 治疗的患者中,阻抗-pH 监测测量的弱酸性反流事件数与反刍发作和胃上嗳气的频率显著相关。
结论
在通过 PP-HRIM 评估的 94 例 PPI 治疗无反应者的回顾性分析中,我们在 76%的病例中检测到异常的餐后模式:其中 42%的病例表现为胃上嗳气,20%的病例表现为反刍,14%的病例仅表现为反流。各组之间在年龄、食管胃结合部收缩性、阻抗-pH 谱和症状表现方面存在显著差异。PP-HRIM 可用于临床评估 PPI 无反应的机制。