He Jin, Jin Yi, Du Yan-Lei, Wang Tao, Turner Neil C, Yang Ru-Ping, Siddique Kadambot H M, Li Feng-Min
College of Agriculture, Guizhou UniversityGuiyang, China.
State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Institute of Arid Agroecology, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou UniversityLanzhou, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Aug 29;8:1499. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01499. eCollection 2017.
Water shortage and low phosphorus (P) availability limit yields in soybean. Roots play important roles in water-limited and P-deficient environment, but the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. In this study we determined the responses of four soybean [ (L.) Merr.] genotypes [Huandsedadou (HD), Bailudou (BLD), Jindou 21 (J21), and Zhonghuang 30 (ZH)] to three P levels [applied 0 (P0), 60 (P60), and 120 (P120) mg P kg dry soil to the upper 0.4 m of the soil profile] and two water treatment [well-watered (WW) and water-stressed (WS)] with special reference to root morphology and architecture, we compared yield and its components, root morphology and root architecture to find out which variety and/or what kind of root architecture had high grain yield under P and drought stress. The results showed that water stress and low P, respectively, significantly reduced grain yield by 60 and 40%, daily water use by 66 and 31%, P accumulation by 40 and 80%, and N accumulation by 39 and 65%. The cultivar ZH with the lowest daily water use had the highest grain yield at P60 and P120 under drought. Increased root length was positively associated with N and P accumulation in both the WW and WS treatments, but not with grain yield under water and P deficits. However, in the WS treatment, high adventitious and lateral root densities were associated with high N and P uptake per unit root length which in turn was significantly and positively associated with grain yield. Our results suggest that (1) genetic variation of grain yield, daily water use, P and N accumulation, and root morphology and architecture were observed among the soybean cultivars and ZH had the best yield performance under P and water limited conditions; (2) water has a major influence on nutrient uptake and grain yield, while additional P supply can modestly increase yields under drought in some soybean genotypes; (3) while conserved water use plays an important role in grain yield under drought, root traits also contribute to high nutrient uptake efficiency and benefit yield under drought.
缺水和低磷可用性限制了大豆产量。根系在水分受限和缺磷环境中发挥着重要作用,但其潜在机制在很大程度上尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们测定了4个大豆[(L.)Merr.]基因型[皖豆筛豆(HD)、白露豆(BLD)、金豆21(J21)和中黄30(ZH)]对3个磷水平[在土壤剖面0.4 m上层施用0(P0)、60(P60)和120(P120)mg P kg干土]和2种水分处理[充分浇水(WW)和水分胁迫(WS)]的响应,特别关注根系形态和结构,我们比较了产量及其构成因素、根系形态和根系结构,以找出在磷和干旱胁迫下哪种品种和/或哪种根系结构具有高籽粒产量。结果表明,水分胁迫和低磷分别显著降低了籽粒产量60%和40%,日用水量66%和31%,磷积累量40%和80%,氮积累量39%和65%。在干旱条件下,日用水量最低的品种ZH在P60和P120水平下籽粒产量最高。在充分浇水和水分胁迫处理中,根长增加与氮和磷积累呈正相关,但在水分和磷亏缺条件下与籽粒产量无关。然而,在水分胁迫处理中,高不定根和侧根密度与单位根长的高氮和磷吸收相关,而这又与籽粒产量显著正相关。我们的结果表明:(1)在大豆品种间观察到籽粒产量、日用水量、磷和氮积累以及根系形态和结构的遗传变异,ZH在磷和水分受限条件下具有最佳的产量表现;(2)水分对养分吸收和籽粒产量有主要影响,而额外的磷供应在干旱条件下可适度提高某些大豆基因型的产量;(3)虽然节水在干旱条件下对籽粒产量起重要作用,但根系性状也有助于提高养分吸收效率并在干旱条件下有利于产量。