Chertoff Jason, Lowther Grant, Alnuaimat Hassan, Ataya Ali
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Gastroenterology Res. 2017 Aug;10(4):235-237. doi: 10.14740/gr891w. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) may be beneficial in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). We sought to investigate how frequently intensivists at our academic institution use TXA for patients with UGIB, and to investigate whether the utilization rate of TXA differs between surgical and medical intensivists, and provide an updated literature review on the subject.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted for UGIB to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) and the medical intensive care unit (MICU) at our academic healthcare facility (University of Florida Health - Shands Hospital) from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2016. The patients were categorized as receiving or not receiving TXA. The overall utilization rate of TXA was calculated, and the utilization rates for the MICU and SICU were compared using a two-sample test for equality of two proportions with continuity correction.
The study cohort included a total of 1,829 patients with a diagnosis of UGIB. Of those, 988 were treated in the MICU and 841 were treated in the SICU. Of the 988 patients in the MICU, six received TXA (0.61%), while 10 (1.19%) of the 841 patients in the SICU received TXA. The overall utilization rate of TXA was 0.87%. The odds of receiving TXA in the SICU were 1.97 times greater than in the MICU (odds ratio (OR): 1.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74 - 5.2, P = 1.83).
Our study suggests that TXA may be underused in the management of UGIB, and that the utilization rate does not differ significantly between surgical and medical intensivists.
氨甲环酸(TXA)可能有助于上消化道出血(UGIB)的管理。我们试图调查我们学术机构的重症监护医生对UGIB患者使用TXA的频率,并调查外科和内科重症监护医生之间TXA的使用率是否存在差异,并提供关于该主题的最新文献综述。
我们对2013年1月1日至2016年12月31日在我们学术医疗设施(佛罗里达大学健康-尚德医院)的外科重症监护病房(SICU)和内科重症监护病房(MICU)因UGIB入院的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。患者被分类为接受或未接受TXA。计算TXA的总体使用率,并使用具有连续性校正的两样本检验比较两个比例的相等性来比较MICU和SICU的使用率。
研究队列包括总共1829例诊断为UGIB的患者。其中,988例在MICU接受治疗,841例在SICU接受治疗。在MICU的988例患者中,6例接受了TXA(0.61%),而在SICU的841例患者中有10例(1.19%)接受了TXA。TXA的总体使用率为0.87%。在SICU接受TXA的几率比在MICU高1.97倍(优势比(OR):1.97,95%置信区间(CI):0.74 - 5.2,P = 1.83)。
我们的研究表明,TXA在UGIB的管理中可能未得到充分利用,并且外科和内科重症监护医生之间的使用率没有显著差异。