Studeny Scott, Burley Lauren, Cowen Kelsey, Akers Melanie, O'Neill Kelly, Flesher Susan L
Department of Pediatrics, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.
Joan C. Edwards Marshall University School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.
SAGE Open Med. 2017 Sep 6;5:2050312117729098. doi: 10.1177/2050312117729098. eCollection 2017.
Previous studies have emphasized the importance of effectual communication during patient handoffs. The objectives of this study were to (1) implement a resident-driven quality improvement project to improve handoffs by including key elements that are necessary for a safe and effective handoff. We chose to use the IPASS (illness severity, patient summary, action items, situation awareness and contingency planning, synthesis by receiver) mnemonic as our standardized handoff model; (2) Consider balancing measures in an effort to be aware of any negative effects of our interventions on resident satisfaction with the system.
A senior resident established a quality improvement team which developed an AIM statement (a written, measurable, and time-sensitive description of the goal of a quality improvement team) and key drivers. A survey was administered to residents regarding their opinions about the handoff process. Tracking of whether or not handoffs included the component IPASS elements was performed over an 11-month period. During this time frame, three Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were conducted. The first was an educational series involving lecture and role playing. The second was printed cards listing appropriate handoff elements. Intervention three was development of a tool and method to decrease nurse interruptions during handoff.
Inclusion of six key elements of handoffs improved as follows. Illness severity improved from 5% to 97%, diagnosis from 60% to 100%, patient summary from 71% to 100%, contingency planning from 10% to 100%, action list from 23% to 100%, and receiver synthesis from 0% to 97%. Balancing measures showed the residents were more satisfied with the new system and found it to be more effective at providing a safe transition of care.
Implementation of a resident-driven multidisciplinary IPASS handoff system resulted in improved inclusion of key handoff elements and increased resident satisfaction.
以往研究强调了患者交接班期间有效沟通的重要性。本研究的目的是:(1)开展一项由住院医师推动的质量改进项目,通过纳入安全有效交接班所需的关键要素来改善交接班情况。我们选择使用IPASS(病情严重程度、患者总结、行动项目、态势感知与应急计划、接收者综合)助记符作为我们的标准化交接班模型;(2)考虑采用平衡措施,以了解我们的干预措施对住院医师对该系统满意度的任何负面影响。
一名高级住院医师组建了一个质量改进团队,该团队制定了一份AIM声明(对质量改进团队目标的书面、可衡量且有时限的描述)和关键驱动因素。就住院医师对交接班流程的看法进行了一项调查。在11个月的时间里,跟踪交接班是否包含IPASS要素。在此期间,进行了三个计划-实施-研究-改进循环。第一个是包括讲座和角色扮演的教育系列。第二个是列出适当交接班要素的打印卡片。干预措施三是开发一种工具和方法,以减少交接班期间护士的打断。
交接班六个关键要素的纳入情况改善如下。病情严重程度从5%提高到97%,诊断从60%提高到100%,患者总结从71%提高到100%,应急计划从10%提高到100%,行动清单从23%提高到100%,接收者综合从0%提高到97%。平衡措施表明,住院医师对新系统更满意,并且发现它在提供安全的护理交接方面更有效。
实施由住院医师推动的多学科IPASS交接班系统导致关键交接班要素的纳入情况得到改善,住院医师满意度提高。