Tufts Lauren M, Damron Christopher L, Flesher Susan L
Marshall Health Department of Pediatrics, Marshall University, Huntington, W.Va.
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 Jan 22;5(1):e251. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000251. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.
Quality patient handoff is vital in patient care and attainable with structured handoff systems, such as the I-PASS mnemonic. This paper describes a continuous quality improvement study occurring after the implementation of the I-PASS handoff bundle. Our objectives were to (1) determine compliance with the inclusion of I-PASS elements during handoff and (2) determine whether the addition of CORES, an electronic tool that generates a patient list designed for use with I-PASS, would improve compliance and sustainability.
We developed an aim statement: 90% of handoffs would include all 6 I-PASS elements within 6 months of the addition of CORES. Two plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were conducted. In PDSA 1, we implemented CORES. In PDSA 2, we reeducated residents on I-PASS elements and the importance of a quality handoff. We used a checklist to evaluate the inclusion of I-PASS elements. Following PDSA 2, we administered a survey regarding CORES to involved residents.
During PDSA 1, illness severity, diagnosis, patient summary, contingency planning, action list, and receiver synthesis were present in 13%, 62%, 52%, 87%, 42%, and 25% of handoffs, respectively. Overall compliance was 47%. During PDSA 2, illness severity remained stable at 13% whereas the remainder increased to 84%, 82%, 93%, 91%, and 37%. Overall compliance increased to 67%. Following PDSA 2, 100% of survey respondents reported improved handoff with CORES.
In this study, we show that neither implementation of CORES nor resident reeducation resulted in the return to high postintervention compliance observed after implementation of the I-PASS handoff bundle.
高质量的患者交接在患者护理中至关重要,通过结构化的交接系统(如I-PASS记忆法)是可以实现的。本文描述了在实施I-PASS交接包后进行的一项持续质量改进研究。我们的目标是:(1)确定在交接过程中对I-PASS要素纳入的依从性;(2)确定添加CORES(一种生成用于I-PASS的患者列表的电子工具)是否会提高依从性和可持续性。
我们制定了一个目标声明:在添加CORES后的6个月内,90%的交接应包含所有6个I-PASS要素。进行了两个计划-实施-研究-改进(PDSA)循环。在PDSA 1中,我们实施了CORES。在PDSA 2中,我们对住院医师重新进行了I-PASS要素及高质量交接重要性的教育。我们使用一份清单来评估I-PASS要素的纳入情况。在PDSA 2之后,我们对参与的住院医师进行了关于CORES的调查。
在PDSA 1期间,病情严重程度、诊断、患者总结、应急计划、行动清单和接收者综合在交接中的占比分别为13%、62%、52%、87%、42%和25%。总体依从性为47%。在PDSA 2期间,病情严重程度保持在13%稳定,而其余各项分别增至84%、82%、93%、91%和37%。总体依从性提高到67%。在PDSA 2之后,100%的调查受访者表示使用CORES后交接情况有所改善。
在本研究中,我们表明,无论是实施CORES还是对住院医师进行再教育,都未能使干预后恢复到实施I-PASS交接包后所观察到的高依从性水平。