Gurman Gabriel M
Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016 Apr;23(1):83-89. doi: 10.21454/rjaic.7518.231.hps.
The paper discusses the subject of futile treatment in the case of a hopelessly ill patient. The topic has many facets, among them the ethical precepts of preventing futile treatment, but also the economic and logistic impact of treating patients who do not have a fair chance of benefitting from managing their medical condition. A 75-year old patient, suffering from an advanced stage of Alzheimer's disease and a clinical picture of acute surgical abdomen, is presented and two approaches are discussed. The first scenario is the aggressive management, including immediate laparotomy and admission to an intensive care unit, a solution without a fair chance of saving the patient's life. The most favorable, but theoretical, output in this case would be the patient's return to his previous mental condition, without any connection with the reality and surroundings and in permanent need for help, supervision and assistance. The second option is letting the patient die in dignity, alleviating pain and surrounded by family. The role of the primary care physician and family is discussed and some ethical principles are presented in order to emphasize the importance of preventing futile treatment in a case of a terminally ill patient.
本文讨论了绝症患者无效治疗的问题。这个话题有很多方面,其中包括防止无效治疗的伦理准则,以及治疗那些没有从治疗其病情中获益的公平机会的患者所产生的经济和后勤影响。文中介绍了一位75岁的患者,他患有晚期阿尔茨海默病且呈现出急性外科急腹症的临床表现,并讨论了两种治疗方法。第一种方案是积极治疗,包括立即剖腹手术并入住重症监护病房,这种解决方案没有挽救患者生命的公平机会。在这种情况下,最理想但只是理论上的结果是患者恢复到之前的精神状态,与现实和周围环境毫无关联,且永远需要帮助、监督和照料。第二种选择是让患者有尊严地离世,减轻痛苦并让家人陪伴在身边。文中讨论了初级保健医生和家属的作用,并提出了一些伦理原则,以强调在绝症患者案例中防止无效治疗的重要性。