Martin F
Department of Medicine, University of Montreal, Canada.
Dig Dis Sci. 1987 Dec;32(12 Suppl):57S-63S. doi: 10.1007/BF01312465.
Therapeutic efficacy of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) preparations is reviewed. In the acute treatment of Crohn's disease, Pentasa and Salofalk seem to be more effective than placebo. When it is given in an equimolar 5-ASA regimen, Salofalk appears to be at least as effective as sulfasalazine (SAS) in the treatment of both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Asacol and SAS are equally effective in maintenance therapy of ulcerative colitis. Dipentum was more efficient than placebo. There was only a low incidence of side effects from oral 5-ASA preparations, but larger-scale trials may be needed for a more accurate profile of adverse reactions.
本文综述了5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA)制剂的治疗效果。在克罗恩病的急性治疗中,颇得斯安(Pentasa)和莎尔福(Salofalk)似乎比安慰剂更有效。当以等摩尔5-ASA方案给药时,莎尔福在治疗克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎方面似乎至少与柳氮磺胺吡啶(SAS)一样有效。艾迪莎(Asacol)和柳氮磺胺吡啶在溃疡性结肠炎的维持治疗中效果相当。得舒特(Dipentum)比安慰剂更有效。口服型5-ASA制剂的副作用发生率较低,但可能需要更大规模的试验来更准确地了解不良反应情况。