• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食品福利计划中的经济激励措施和购买限制会影响所购买食品和饮料的种类:一项随机试验的结果

Financial incentives and purchase restrictions in a food benefit program affect the types of foods and beverages purchased: results from a randomized trial.

作者信息

French Simone A, Rydell Sarah A, Mitchell Nathan R, Michael Oakes J, Elbel Brian, Harnack Lisa

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 1300 S. 2nd Street, Suite 300, 55454, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Department of Population Health, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Sep 16;14(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0585-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-017-0585-9
PMID:28915844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5602848/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This research evaluated the effects of financial incentives and purchase restrictions on food purchasing in a food benefit program for low income people.

METHODS

Participants (n=279) were randomized to groups: 1) Incentive- 30% financial incentive for fruits and vegetables purchased with food benefits; 2) Restriction- no purchase of sugar-sweetened beverages, sweet baked goods, or candies with food benefits; 3) Incentive plus Restriction; or 4) Control- no incentive or restrictions. Participants received a study-specific debit card where funds were added monthly for 12-weeks. Food purchase receipts were collected over 16 weeks. Total dollars spent on grocery purchases and by targeted food categories were computed from receipts. Group differences were examined using general linear models.

RESULTS

Weekly purchases of fruit significantly increased in the Incentive plus Restriction ($4.8) compared to the Restriction ($1.7) and Control ($2.1) groups (p <.01). Sugar-sweetened beverage purchases significantly decreased in the Incentive plus Restriction (-$0.8 per week) and Restriction ($-1.4 per week) groups compared to the Control group (+$1.5; p< .0001). Sweet baked goods purchases significantly decreased in the Restriction (-$0.70 per week) compared to the Control group (+$0.82 per week; p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Paired financial incentives and restrictions on foods and beverages purchased with food program funds may support more healthful food purchases compared to no incentives or restrictions.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02643576 .

摘要

背景

本研究评估了经济激励措施和购买限制对一项针对低收入人群的食品福利计划中食品购买行为的影响。

方法

参与者(n = 279)被随机分为几组:1)激励组——使用食品福利购买水果和蔬菜可获得30%的经济激励;2)限制组——禁止使用食品福利购买含糖饮料、甜烘焙食品或糖果;3)激励加限制组;或4)对照组——无激励或限制措施。参与者收到一张特定研究的借记卡,每月向卡中充值,为期12周。在16周内收集食品购买收据。根据收据计算购买食品杂货和特定食品类别的总支出金额。使用一般线性模型检验组间差异。

结果

与限制组(每周1.7美元)和对照组(每周2.1美元)相比,激励加限制组(每周4.8美元)的水果每周购买量显著增加(p <.01)。与对照组(每周1.5美元)相比,激励加限制组(每周 - 0.8美元)和限制组(每周 - 1.4美元)的含糖饮料购买量显著减少(p <.0001)。与对照组(每周0.82美元)相比,限制组(每周 - 0.70美元)的甜烘焙食品购买量显著减少(p <.01)。

结论

与无激励或限制措施相比,对使用食品计划资金购买的食品和饮料同时实施经济激励和限制措施,可能有助于促进更健康的食品购买。

临床试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT02643576 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19be/5602848/10a912586440/12966_2017_585_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19be/5602848/10a912586440/12966_2017_585_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19be/5602848/10a912586440/12966_2017_585_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Financial incentives and purchase restrictions in a food benefit program affect the types of foods and beverages purchased: results from a randomized trial.食品福利计划中的经济激励措施和购买限制会影响所购买食品和饮料的种类:一项随机试验的结果
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Sep 16;14(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0585-9.
2
Effects of Subsidies and Prohibitions on Nutrition in a Food Benefit Program: A Randomized Clinical Trial.食品福利计划中补贴与禁令对营养的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Nov 1;176(11):1610-1618. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5633.
3
Effects of Inclusion of Food Purchase Restrictions and Incentives in a Food Benefit Program on Diet Quality and Food Purchasing: Results From a Randomized Trial.食品福利计划中包含食品购买限制和激励措施对饮食质量和食品购买的影响:一项随机试验的结果。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2024 May;124(5):569-582.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2023.11.024. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
4
Participant Satisfaction with a Food Benefit Program with Restrictions and Incentives.参与者对具有限制和激励措施的食品福利计划的满意度。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Feb;118(2):294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
5
The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial.经济激励和限制措施对接受营养援助的低收入家庭周期性食品支出的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Dec 4;18(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01223-7.
6
Perceptions of a food benefit programme that includes financial incentives for the purchase of fruits and vegetables and restrictions on the purchase of foods high in added sugar.对包含购买水果和蔬菜的经济激励以及限制购买高添加糖食品的食品福利计划的看法。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Jun;25(6):1528-1536. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021001051. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
7
Cost-effectiveness of financial incentives and disincentives for improving food purchases and health through the US Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): A microsimulation study.通过美国补充营养援助计划(SNAP)提高食品购买和健康水平的经济激励和抑制措施的成本效益:一项微观模拟研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Oct 2;15(10):e1002661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002661. eCollection 2018 Oct.
8
Patterns of beverage purchases amongst British households: A latent class analysis.英国家庭饮料购买模式:潜在类别分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 8;17(9):e1003245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003245. eCollection 2020 Sep.
9
Association of a Fruit and Vegetable Subsidy Program With Food Purchases by Individuals With Low Income in the US.美国低收入个体的蔬果补贴计划与食品购买之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2120377. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20377.
10
Double Up Food Bucks program effects on SNAP recipients' fruit and vegetable purchases.“双倍食品券计划”对补充营养援助计划(SNAP)受益人的水果和蔬菜购买行为的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):946. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4942-z.

引用本文的文献

1
An environmental scan of financial incentives to increase access to healthy foods: How, how much, and how often?增加健康食品可及性的经济激励措施的环境扫描:方式、金额及频率如何?
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 19;25(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21855-9.
2
Are Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Restrictions on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Effective in Reducing Purchase or Consumption? A Systematic Review.补充营养援助计划对含糖饮料的限制是否有效降低购买或消费?系统评价。
Nutrients. 2024 May 12;16(10):1459. doi: 10.3390/nu16101459.
3
Effects of Inclusion of Food Purchase Restrictions and Incentives in a Food Benefit Program on Diet Quality and Food Purchasing: Results From a Randomized Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Subsidies and Prohibitions on Nutrition in a Food Benefit Program: A Randomized Clinical Trial.食品福利计划中补贴与禁令对营养的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Nov 1;176(11):1610-1618. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5633.
2
Promotion of healthy eating through public policy: a controlled experiment.通过公共政策促进健康饮食:一项对照实验。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.023.
3
Associations of food stamp participation with dietary quality and obesity in children.食品券参与度与儿童饮食质量和肥胖的关联。
食品福利计划中包含食品购买限制和激励措施对饮食质量和食品购买的影响:一项随机试验的结果。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2024 May;124(5):569-582.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2023.11.024. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
4
Impact of a financial incentive scheme on purchase of fruits and vegetables from unorganised retailers in rural India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.一项财政激励计划对印度农村非正规零售商处果蔬购买行为的影响:一项整群随机对照试验
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023 Feb 1;12:100140. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100140. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Socio-economic inequalities in the consumption of fruits and vegetables in Peru between 2014 and 2019.2014年至2019年秘鲁水果和蔬菜消费中的社会经济不平等现象。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Sep 8;25(12):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022001860.
6
SNAP and Cardiometabolic Risk in Youth.SNAP 与青年人心血管代谢风险。
Nutrients. 2022 Jul 2;14(13):2756. doi: 10.3390/nu14132756.
7
Evaluation of Economic and Health Outcomes Associated With Food Taxes and Subsidies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估与食品税和补贴相关的经济和健康结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2214371. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14371.
8
Would A National Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax In The United States Be Well Targeted?美国全国性的含糖饮料税目标设定合理吗?
Am J Agric Econ. 2021 May;103(3):961-986. doi: 10.1111/ajae.12190. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
9
Online Pilot Grocery Intervention among Rural and Urban Residents Aimed to Improve Purchasing Habits.线上试点城乡居民食品杂货干预项目,旨在改善购买习惯。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;19(2):871. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020871.
10
The impact of financial incentives and restrictions on cyclical food expenditures among low-income households receiving nutrition assistance: a randomized controlled trial.经济激励和限制措施对接受营养援助的低收入家庭周期性食品支出的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Dec 4;18(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01223-7.
Pediatrics. 2013 Mar;131(3):463-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0889. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
4
The impact of price discounts and calorie messaging on beverage consumption: a multi-site field study.价格折扣和卡路里信息对饮料消费的影响:一项多地点现场研究。
Prev Med. 2012 Dec;55(6):629-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.10.009. Epub 2012 Oct 13.
5
Dietary intake and dietary quality of low-income adults in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.补充营养援助计划中低收入成年人的饮食摄入和饮食质量。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Nov;96(5):977-88. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.040014. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
6
Grocery store beverage choices by participants in federal food assistance and nutrition programs.参与联邦食品援助和营养计划的人员在杂货店的饮料选择。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Oct;43(4):411-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.015.
7
Experimental research on the relation between food price changes and food-purchasing patterns: a targeted review.关于食品价格变化与食品购买模式关系的实验研究:有针对性的综述。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Apr;95(4):789-809. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.024380. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
8
Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010.美国儿童和青少年肥胖率及体重指数趋势,1999-2010 年。
JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):483-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.40. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
9
Household obesity prevention: Take Action--a group-randomized trial.家庭肥胖预防:采取行动——一项群组随机试验。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Oct;19(10):2082-8. doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.328. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
10
Household income differences in food sources and food items purchased.家庭收入差异对食品来源和购买食品的影响。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Oct 26;7:77. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-77.