Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2546-z.
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are common tools in policy and clinical practice informing clinical decisions at the bedside, governance of health facilities, health insurer and government spending, and patient choices. South Africa's health sector is transitioning to a national health insurance system, aiming to build on other primary health care initiatives to transform the previously segregated, inequitable services. Within these plans CPGs are an integral tool for delivering standardised and cost effective care. Currently, there is no accepted standard approach to developing, adapting or implementing CPGs efficiently or effectively in South Africa. We explored the current players; drivers; and the context and processes of primary care CPG development from the perspective of stakeholders operating at national level.
We used a qualitative approach. Sampling was initially purposeful, followed by snowballing and further sampling to reach representivity of primary care service providers. Individual in-depth interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used thematic content analysis to analyse the data.
We conducted 37 in-depth interviews from June 2014-July 2015. We found CPG development and implementation were hampered by lack of human and funding resources for technical and methodological work; fragmentation between groups, and between national and provincial health sectors; and lack of agreed systems for CPG development and implementation. Some CPG contributors steadfastly work to improve processes aiming to enhance communication, use of evidence, and transparency to ensure credible guidance is produced. Many interviewed had shared values, and were driven to address inequity, however, resource gaps were perceived to create an enabling environment for commercial interests or personal agendas to drive the CPG development process.
Our findings identified strengths and gaps in CPG development processes, and a need for national standards to guide CPG development and implementation. Based on our findings and suggestions from participants, a possible way forward would be for South Africa to have a centrally coordinated CPG unit to address these needs and aspects of fragmentation by devising processes that support collaboration, transparency and credibility across sectors and disciplines. Such an initiative will require adequate resourcing to build capacity and ensure support for the delivery of high quality CPGs for South African primary care.
临床实践指南(CPGs)是政策和临床实践中常用的工具,用于指导床边的临床决策、医疗机构管理、医保和政府支出以及患者选择。南非的卫生部门正在向国家医疗保险制度过渡,旨在利用其他初级卫生保健举措,转变以前隔离、不平等的服务。在这些计划中,CPGs 是提供标准化和具有成本效益的护理的重要工具。目前,南非没有一种被接受的标准方法来高效、有效地制定、改编或实施 CPGs。我们从在国家层面开展工作的利益攸关方的角度,探讨了初级保健 CPG 开发的现行参与者、驱动因素以及背景和流程。
我们采用了定性方法。最初的抽样是有目的的,然后采用滚雪球和进一步抽样的方法,以达到初级保健服务提供者的代表性。对个人进行了深入的访谈并逐字记录。我们使用主题内容分析来分析数据。
我们在 2014 年 6 月至 2015 年 7 月期间进行了 37 次深入访谈。我们发现,CPG 的制定和实施受到缺乏人力和资金资源用于技术和方法工作、团体之间以及国家和省级卫生部门之间的分裂以及缺乏商定的 CPG 制定和实施系统的阻碍。一些 CPG 贡献者坚定地致力于改进流程,旨在加强沟通、使用证据和提高透明度,以确保制定可信的指南。许多接受采访的人都有共同的价值观,并致力于解决不平等问题,然而,资源差距被认为是为商业利益或个人议程创造有利环境,以推动 CPG 制定过程。
我们的研究结果确定了 CPG 制定过程中的优势和差距,以及需要制定国家标准来指导 CPG 的制定和实施。根据我们的研究结果和参与者的建议,南非可以设立一个中央协调的 CPG 部门,通过制定支持跨部门和学科合作、透明度和可信度的流程来解决这些需求和碎片化问题。这一举措需要充足的资源来建立能力,并确保为南非初级保健提供高质量的 CPG 提供支持。