Pande Chetna K, Stayer Kelsey, Rappold Thomas, Alvin Madeleine, Koszela Keri, Kudchadkar Sapna R
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Crit Care Res Pract. 2023 Oct 4;2023:4504934. doi: 10.1155/2023/4504934. eCollection 2023.
Successful execution of invasive procedures in acute care settings, including tracheal intubation, requires careful coordination of an interprofessional team. The stress inherent to the intensive care unit (ICU) environment may threaten the optimal communication and planning necessary for the safe execution of this complex procedure. The objective of this study is to characterize the perceptions of interprofessional team members surrounding tracheal intubations in the pediatric ICU (PICU).
This is a single-center survey-based study of staff involved in the intubation of pediatric patients admitted to a tertiary level academic PICU. Physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists (RT) involved in tracheal intubations were queried via standardized, discipline-specific electronic surveys regarding their involvement in procedural planning and overall awareness of and comfort with the intubation plan. Qualitative variables were assessed by both Likert scales and free-text comments that were grouped and analyzed thematically.
One hundred and eleven intubation encounters were included during the study time period, of which 93 (84%) had survey responses from at least 2 professional teams. Among those included in the analysis, the survey was completed 244 times by members of the PICU teams including 86 responses from physicians, 76 from nurses, and 82 from RTs. Survey response rates were >80% from each provider team. There were significant differences in interprofessional team comfort with nurses feeling less well informed and comfortable with the intubation plan and process compared to physicians and RTs ( < 0.001 for both). Qualitative themes including clear communication, adequate planning and preparation prior to procedure initiation, and clear definition of roles emerged among both affirmative and constructive comments.
Exploration of provider perceptions and emergence of constructive themes expose opportunities for teamwork improvement strategies involving intubations in the PICU. The use of a preintubation checklist may improve organization and communication amongst team members, increase provider morale, decrease team stress levels, and, ultimately, may improve patient outcomes during this high stakes, coordinated event.
在急性护理环境中成功实施侵入性操作,包括气管插管,需要跨专业团队的精心协作。重症监护病房(ICU)环境中固有的压力可能会威胁到安全执行这一复杂操作所需的最佳沟通与规划。本研究的目的是描述儿科重症监护病房(PICU)跨专业团队成员对气管插管的看法。
这是一项基于单中心调查的研究,对象是参与三级学术性PICU收治的儿科患者插管的工作人员。通过标准化的、针对特定学科的电子调查问卷,询问参与气管插管的医生、护士和呼吸治疗师(RT)在操作规划中的参与情况,以及他们对插管计划的总体认知和舒适度。定性变量通过李克特量表和自由文本评论进行评估,并进行主题分组和分析。
在研究期间纳入了111次插管病例,其中93例(84%)至少有来自2个专业团队的调查回复。在纳入分析的病例中,PICU团队成员共完成调查244次,其中医生回复86次,护士回复76次,RT回复82次。每个提供医疗服务的团队的调查回复率均>80%。跨专业团队之间在舒适度方面存在显著差异,与医生和RT相比,护士对插管计划和过程的了解较少且舒适度较低(两者均<0.001)。肯定性和建设性评论中均出现了包括清晰沟通、操作开始前充分规划和准备以及明确角色定义等定性主题。
对医疗服务提供者看法的探索以及建设性主题的出现,揭示了改善PICU插管团队协作策略的机会。使用插管前检查表可能会改善团队成员之间的组织和沟通,提高医疗服务提供者的士气,降低团队压力水平,并最终可能改善这一高风险、需要协作的操作过程中的患者预后。