Nosch Daniela S, Pult Heiko, Albon Julie, Purslow Christine, Murphy Paul J
Institute of Optometry, University of Applied Sciences, Olten, Switzerland.
School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Mar;101(2):193-199. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12603. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
Belmonte Ocular Pain Meter (OPM) air jet aesthesiometry overcomes some of the limitations of the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer. However, for true mechanical corneal sensitivity measurement, the airflow stimulus temperature of the aesthesiometer must equal ocular surface temperature (OST), to avoid additional response from temperature-sensitive nerves. The aim of this study was to determine: (A) the stimulus temperature inducing no or least change in OST; and (B) to evaluate if OST remains unchanged with different stimulus durations and airflow rates.
A total of 14 subjects (mean age 25.14 ± 2.18 years; seven women) participated in this clinical cohort study: (A) OST was recorded using an infrared camera (FLIR A310) during the presentation of airflow stimuli, at five temperatures, ambient temperature (AT) +5°C, +10°C, +15°C, +20°C and +30°C, using the OPM aesthesiometer (duration three seconds; over a four millimetre distance; airflow rate 60 ml/min); and (B) OST measurements were repeated with two stimulus temperatures (AT +10°C and +15°C) while varying stimulus durations (three seconds and five seconds) and airflow rates (30, 60, 80 and 100 ml/min). Inclusion criteria were age <40 years, no contact lens wear, absence of ocular disease including dry eye, and no use of artificial tears. Repeated measures (analysis of variance) and appropriate post-hoc t-tests were applied.
(A) Stimulus temperatures of AT +10°C and +15°C induced the least changes in OST (-0.20 ± 0.13°C and 0.08 ± 0.05°C). (B) OST changes were statistically significant with both stimulus temperatures and increased with increasing airflow rates (p < 0.001), and were more marked with stimulus temperature AT +10°C.
A true mechanical threshold for corneal sensitivity cannot be established with the air stimulus of the Belmonte OPM because its air jet stimulus with mechanical setting is likely to have a thermal component. Appropriate stimulus selection for an air jet aesthesiometer must incorporate stimulus temperature control that can vary with stimulus duration and airflow rate.
贝尔蒙特眼痛计(OPM)气流测痛法克服了科谢 - 博内测痛仪的一些局限性。然而,对于真正的角膜机械敏感性测量,测痛仪的气流刺激温度必须等于眼表温度(OST),以避免温度敏感神经产生额外反应。本研究的目的是确定:(A)引起眼表温度无变化或变化最小的刺激温度;(B)评估在不同刺激持续时间和气流速率下眼表温度是否保持不变。
共有14名受试者(平均年龄25.14±2.18岁;7名女性)参与了这项临床队列研究:(A)使用红外热像仪(FLIR A310)在气流刺激呈现期间记录眼表温度,气流刺激温度设置为五个温度,即环境温度(AT)+5°C、+10°C、+15°C、+20°C和+30°C,使用OPM眼痛计(持续时间3秒;距离4毫米;气流速率60毫升/分钟);(B)在两个刺激温度(AT +10°C和+15°C)下重复测量眼表温度,同时改变刺激持续时间(3秒和5秒)和气流速率(30、60、80和100毫升/分钟)。纳入标准为年龄<40岁、不佩戴隐形眼镜、无眼部疾病(包括干眼)且未使用人工泪液。采用重复测量(方差分析)和适当的事后t检验。
(A)AT +10°C和+15°C的刺激温度引起的眼表温度变化最小(分别为-0.20±0.13°C和0.08±0.05°C)。(B)两种刺激温度下眼表温度变化均具有统计学意义,且随气流速率增加而升高(p<0.001),在刺激温度AT +10°C时更为明显。
使用贝尔蒙特OPM的空气刺激无法确定角膜敏感性的真正机械阈值,因为其具有机械设置的气流刺激可能包含热成分。气流测痛仪的合适刺激选择必须包括可随刺激持续时间和气流速率变化的刺激温度控制。