Zabih Weeda, Holler Theresa, Syed Faiza, Russell Laurie, Allegro Jennifer, Amin Reshma
Division of Respiratory Medicine.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.
Respir Care. 2017 Dec;62(12):1594-1601. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05599. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
One-way speaking valves have been successfully used to restore audible meaningful speech in adult patients after tracheostomy tube placement. One-way speaking valves have also been used in pediatric patients after tracheostomy tube placement with promising results. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize and summarize the current evidence on the use of one-way tracheostomy tube speaking valves in the pediatric population to identify knowledge gaps that could inform future research programs and facilitate evidence-based clinical decision making. The Arksey and O'Malley 5-step methodological framework was used for this scoping review. We searched OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Google Scholar to locate articles published between January 1, 1946 and May 26, 2016. Our search resulted in a total of 524 articles. After removing 270 duplicates, we screened 254 abstracts, and 50 articles were identified for full text review. We excluded 38 references. A total of 12 articles met our inclusion criteria. Details of all studies were charted. Application of the Sackett levels of evidence to evaluate the qualitative strength of the evidence provided by the 12 articles selected for study found that 6 studies were level 5, 4 were level 4, and 2 studies were categorized as level 3 evidence. Eligibility criteria for trials of speaking valves were inconsistent across all studies and included a combination of clinical assessment coupled with published indications. Much of the literature has focused on tolerance/successful use of speaking valves in children with a tracheostomy with limited evidence on its impact on verbal communication. Current evidence on the use of speaking valves in children with a tracheostomy, its indication, and its impact on verbal communication is inadequate, mandating further research in this area.
单向说话阀已成功用于恢复成年患者气管切开置管后的可听有意义言语。单向说话阀也已用于小儿气管切开置管患者,效果良好。我们进行了一项范围综述,以综合和总结目前关于小儿人群使用单向气管切开管说话阀的证据,识别知识空白,为未来研究计划提供信息,并促进循证临床决策。本范围综述采用了阿克西和奥马利的五步方法框架。我们检索了OVID MEDLINE、EMBASE、PubMed、科学网、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)和谷歌学术,以查找1946年1月1日至2016年5月26日发表的文章。我们的检索共得到524篇文章。去除270篇重复文章后,我们筛选了254篇摘要,确定50篇文章进行全文审阅。我们排除了38篇参考文献。共有12篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。绘制了所有研究的详细信息。应用萨克特证据等级来评估所选进行研究的12篇文章提供的证据的定性强度,发现6项研究为5级,4项为4级,2项研究归类为3级证据。所有研究中,说话阀试验的纳入标准不一致,包括临床评估与已发表适应症的组合。许多文献聚焦于气管切开儿童对说话阀的耐受性/成功使用情况,而关于其对言语交流影响的证据有限。目前关于气管切开儿童使用说话阀的证据、其适应症及其对言语交流的影响并不充分,因此该领域需要进一步研究。