Bhat Anjana N, Hoffman Michael D, Trost Susanna L, Culotta McKenzie L, Eilbott Jeffrey, Tsuzuki Daisuke, Pelphrey Kevin A
Department of Physical Therapy, University of DelawareNewark, DE, United States.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of DelawareNewark, DE, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Sep 5;11:431. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00431. eCollection 2017.
Humans engage in Interpersonal Synchrony (IPS) as they synchronize their own actions with that of a social partner over time. When humans engage in imitation/IPS behaviors, multiple regions in the frontal, temporal, and parietal cortices are activated including the putative Mirror Neuron Systems (Iacoboni, 2005; Buxbaum et al., 2014). In the present study, we compared fNIRS-based cortical activation patterns across three conditions of action observation ("Watch" partner), action execution ("Do" on your own), and IPS (move "Together"). Fifteen typically developing adults completed a reach and cleanup task with the right arm while cortical activation was examined using a 24-channel, Hitachi fNIRS system. Each adult completed 8 trials across three conditions (Watch, Do, and Together). For each fNIRS channel, we obtained oxy hemoglobin (HbO) and deoxy hemoglobin (HHb) profiles. Spatial registration methods were applied to localize the cortical regions underneath each channel and to define six regions of interest (ROIs), right and left supero-anterior (SA or pre/post-central gyri), infero-posterior (IP or angular/supramarginal gyri), and infero-anterior (IA or superior/middle temporal gyri) regions. In terms of task-related differences, the majority of the ROIs were more active during Do and Together compared to Watch. Only the right/ipsilateral fronto-parietal and inferior parietal cortices had greater activation during Together compared to Do. The similarities in cortical activation between action execution and IPS suggest that neural control of IPS is more similar to its execution than observational aspects. To be clear, the more complex the actions performed, the more difficult the IPS behaviors. Secondly, IPS behaviors required slightly more right-sided activation (vs. execution/observation) suggesting that IPS is a higher-order process involving more bilateral activation compared to its sub-components. These findings provide a neuroimaging framework to study imitation and IPS impairments in special populations such as infants at risk for and children with ASD.
随着时间推移,人类会将自己的动作与社交伙伴的动作同步,从而参与人际同步(IPS)。当人类进行模仿/IPS行为时,额叶、颞叶和顶叶皮质的多个区域会被激活,包括假定的镜像神经元系统(Iacoboni,2005年;Buxbaum等人,2014年)。在本研究中,我们比较了基于功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)的皮质激活模式,这些模式出现在动作观察(“观看”伙伴)、动作执行(“自己做”)和人际同步(“一起”移动)这三种情况下。15名发育正常的成年人用右臂完成了一项伸手清理任务,同时使用24通道的日立fNIRS系统检查皮质激活情况。每位成年人在三种情况下(观看、自己做、一起做)各完成8次试验。对于每个fNIRS通道,我们获取了氧合血红蛋白(HbO)和脱氧血红蛋白(HHb)图谱。应用空间配准方法来定位每个通道下方的皮质区域,并定义六个感兴趣区域(ROI),即左右上前方(SA或中央前/后回)、下后方(IP或角回/缘上回)和下前方(IA或颞上/中回)区域。在与任务相关的差异方面,与观看相比,大多数ROI在自己做和一起做时更活跃。与自己做相比,只有右侧/同侧额顶叶和顶下皮质在一起做时激活程度更高。动作执行和人际同步之间皮质激活的相似性表明,人际同步的神经控制与其执行比与观察方面更相似。需要明确的是,执行的动作越复杂,人际同步行为就越困难。其次,人际同步行为需要略多的右侧激活(相对于执行/观察),这表明人际同步是一个更高层次的过程,与它的子成分相比,涉及更多的双侧激活。这些发现为研究特殊人群(如患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)风险的婴儿和儿童)的模仿和人际同步障碍提供了一个神经影像学框架。