• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿替洛尔与普萘洛尔治疗高血压患者的副作用比较。

A comparison of the side effects of atenolol and propranolol in the treatment of patients with hypertension.

作者信息

Fodor J G, Chockalingam A, Drover A, Fifield F, Pauls C J

机构信息

Memorial University of Newfoundland, Faculty of Medicine, St. John's, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 1987 Nov;27(11):892-901. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1987.tb05585.x.

DOI:10.1002/j.1552-4604.1987.tb05585.x
PMID:2892865
Abstract

A single-blind study was conducted in 52 hypertensive patients, aged 25 to 68 years, to compare the side effects of an equally effective antihypertensive regimen of propranolol and atenolol. All patients had a history of side effects with beta-blocker therapy. Patients were treated with propranolol 40 to 160 mg bid for 8 weeks, followed by atenolol 50 to 100 mg given once daily for 8 weeks, and then rechallenged with the required dosage of propranolol for 8 weeks. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were controlled during all three treatment phases. Side effects showed a definite trend toward improvement during the atenolol treatment phase. CNS side effects, in particular, showed significantly (P less than .05) reduced severity scores and overall incidence rates during the atenolol treatment phase. In conclusion, this study showed that at equally effective antihypertensive dosages the hydrophilic beta blocker atenolol produced significantly fewer CNS side effects than the lipophilic beta blocker propranolol.

摘要

对52名年龄在25至68岁之间的高血压患者进行了一项单盲研究,以比较普萘洛尔和阿替洛尔这两种同等有效的抗高血压方案的副作用。所有患者都有β受体阻滞剂治疗的副作用史。患者先接受8周的普萘洛尔治疗,每日两次,每次40至160毫克,随后接受8周的阿替洛尔治疗,每日一次,每次50至100毫克,然后再接受8周所需剂量的普萘洛尔治疗。在所有三个治疗阶段,平均收缩压和舒张压均得到控制。在阿替洛尔治疗阶段,副作用显示出明显的改善趋势。特别是中枢神经系统副作用,在阿替洛尔治疗阶段,严重程度评分和总体发病率显著降低(P小于0.05)。总之,本研究表明,在同等有效的抗高血压剂量下,亲水性β受体阻滞剂阿替洛尔产生的中枢神经系统副作用明显少于亲脂性β受体阻滞剂普萘洛尔。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the side effects of atenolol and propranolol in the treatment of patients with hypertension.阿替洛尔与普萘洛尔治疗高血压患者的副作用比较。
J Clin Pharmacol. 1987 Nov;27(11):892-901. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1987.tb05585.x.
2
A comparison of the antihypertensive effect of atenolol (ICI 66 082) and propranolol.阿替洛尔(ICI 66 082)与普萘洛尔降压效果的比较。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1976 Mar 22;09(5-6):361-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00606549.
3
Comparison of a new vasodilating beta-blocker, carvedilol, with atenolol in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.新型血管扩张性β受体阻滞剂卡维地洛与阿替洛尔治疗轻至中度原发性高血压的比较。
Am J Hypertens. 1994 Feb;7(2):129-36. doi: 10.1093/ajh/7.2.129.
4
Insulin sensitivity following treatment with the alpha 1-blocker bunazosin retard and the beta 1-blocker atenolol in hypertensive non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients.α1受体阻滞剂布那唑嗪和β1受体阻滞剂阿替洛尔治疗高血压非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者后的胰岛素敏感性。
J Hypertens. 1996 Dec;14(12):1469-75. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199612000-00014.
5
The relative antihypertensive potency of propranolol, oxprenolol, atenolol, and metoprolol given once daily. A double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study in ambulatory patients.每日一次服用普萘洛尔、氧烯洛尔、阿替洛尔和美托洛尔的相对降压效能。一项针对非卧床患者的双盲、交叉、安慰剂对照研究。
Arch Intern Med. 1985 Jul;145(7):1321-3.
6
Effects of atenolol and propranolol on platelet aggregation in moderate essential hypertension: randomized crossover trial.阿替洛尔和普萘洛尔对中度原发性高血压患者血小板聚集的影响:随机交叉试验
Croat Med J. 2005 Apr;46(2):219-24.
7
Ambulatory blood pressure during once-daily randomised double-blind administration of atenolol, metoprolol, pindolol, and slow-release propranolol.阿替洛尔、美托洛尔、吲哚洛尔和缓释普萘洛尔每日一次随机双盲给药期间的动态血压
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Nov 13;285(6352):1387-92. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6352.1387.
8
The effects of replacing beta-blockers with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor on the quality of life of hypertensive patients.用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂替代β受体阻滞剂对高血压患者生活质量的影响。
Am J Hypertens. 1996 Dec;9(12 Pt 1):1206-13. doi: 10.1016/S0895-7061(96)00253-1.
9
ACE inhibitor ramipril is more effective than the beta-blocker atenolol in reducing left ventricular mass in hypertension. Results of the RACE (ramipril cardioprotective evaluation) study on behalf of the RACE study group.在降低高血压患者左心室质量方面,血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂雷米普利比β受体阻滞剂阿替洛尔更有效。代表雷米普利心脏保护评估(RACE)研究组的RACE研究结果。
J Hypertens. 1995 Nov;13(11):1325-34. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199511000-00015.
10
Safety and antihypertensive efficacy of carvedilol and atenolol alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide.卡维地洛与阿替洛尔单用及与氢氯噻嗪联用的安全性和降压疗效。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;38 Suppl 2:S143-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01409485.

引用本文的文献

1
Documentation of an instrument for assessment of subjective CNS-related symptoms during cardiovascular pharmacotherapy.一种用于评估心血管药物治疗期间主观中枢神经系统相关症状的工具的文献记录。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989 Dec;3(6):919-27. doi: 10.1007/BF01869582.
2
Atenolol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.阿替洛尔:对其药理特性及在心血管疾病治疗应用的重新评估
Drugs. 1991 Sep;42(3):468-510. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199142030-00007.