• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解与化解相互冲突的传统:一种麦金太尔式的医学伦理共同审议方法

Understanding and Resolving Conflicting Traditions: A MacIntyrean Approach to Shared Deliberation in Medical Ethics.

作者信息

Adkins Jessica

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Saint Louis University, 3800 Lindell Blvd., St. Louis, MO, 63116, USA.

出版信息

HEC Forum. 2018 Mar;30(1):57-70. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9337-0.

DOI:10.1007/s10730-017-9337-0
PMID:28932930
Abstract

The position of clinical ethicist exists to help resolve conflicts in the hospital. Sometimes these conflicts arise because of fundamental cultural differences between the patient and the medical team, and such cases present special challenges. Should the ideology of modern medicine reject the wishes of those who hold ideologies from differing cultures? How can the medical ethicist help resolve such conflicts? To answer these questions, I rely on the works of Alasdair MacIntyre. Using MacIntyre's philosophy, we can better understand why traditions exist, how conflicts arise, and how opposing traditions can collaborate in shared decision making. In order to overcome conflict, I conclude that MacIntyre's virtues of acknowledged dependence must be realized by the ethicist and those in disagreement over tradition. I use a case study of a young Amish patient to highlight the conflicts that arise and to help exhibit how shared decision making can be made possible.

摘要

临床伦理学家这一职位的存在是为了帮助解决医院中的冲突。有时这些冲突是由于患者与医疗团队之间存在根本性的文化差异而产生的,此类情况带来了特殊的挑战。现代医学的理念是否应该拒绝持有不同文化理念者的意愿?医学伦理学家如何帮助解决此类冲突?为了回答这些问题,我借鉴了阿拉斯戴尔·麦金太尔的著作。运用麦金太尔的哲学,我们能够更好地理解传统为何存在、冲突如何产生,以及相互对立的传统如何在共同决策中进行协作。为了克服冲突,我得出结论,伦理学家以及在传统问题上存在分歧的各方必须践行麦金太尔所说的承认依赖的美德。我通过一个年轻阿米什患者的案例研究来突出所产生的冲突,并展示共同决策是如何成为可能的。

相似文献

1
Understanding and Resolving Conflicting Traditions: A MacIntyrean Approach to Shared Deliberation in Medical Ethics.理解与化解相互冲突的传统:一种麦金太尔式的医学伦理共同审议方法
HEC Forum. 2018 Mar;30(1):57-70. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9337-0.
2
Why care for the severely disabled? A critique of MacIntyre's account.为何要照料重度残疾人?对麦金太尔观点的批判。
J Med Philos. 2014 Aug;39(4):459-73. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhu027. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
3
Shared decision making after MacIntyre.麦金太尔之后的共同决策。
J Med Philos. 2011 Apr;36(2):148-69. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr003. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
4
Acknowledging dependence: a MacIntyrean perspective on relationships involving Alzheimer's disease.承认依赖:麦金太尔主义视角下的阿尔茨海默病相关关系
Nurs Ethics. 2004;11(4):400-10. doi: 10.1191/0969733004ne712oa.
5
Pellegrino, MacIntyre, and the internal morality of clinical medicine.佩雷格里诺、麦金泰尔与临床医学的内在道德
Theor Med Bioeth. 2019 Jun;40(3):243-251. doi: 10.1007/s11017-019-09487-8.
6
Addressing complex hospital discharge by cultivating the virtues of acknowledged dependence.培养公认的依赖美德来解决复杂的出院问题。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2020 Jun;41(2-3):99-114. doi: 10.1007/s11017-020-09525-w.
7
Acknowledged Dependence and the Virtues of Perinatal Hospice.公认的依赖性与围产期临终关怀的优点。
J Med Philos. 2016 Feb;41(1):25-40. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv032. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
8
Modern liberalism, female circumcision, and the rationality of traditions.现代自由主义、女性割礼与传统的合理性
J Med Philos. 2004 Aug;29(4):473-97. doi: 10.1080/03605310490503560.
9
The Virtues of Scientific Practice: MacIntyre, Virtue Ethics, and the Historiography of Science.科学实践的美德:麦金太尔、美德伦理学与科学史编纂学
Isis. 2016 Sep;107(3):449-72. doi: 10.1086/688346.
10
Specified principlism: what is it, and does it really resolve cases better than casuistry?特定的原则主义:它是什么,它在解决案例方面真的比决疑法更好吗?
J Med Philos. 2000 Jun;25(3):323-41. doi: 10.1076/0360-5310(200006)25:3;1-H;FT323.

本文引用的文献

1
What is it to do good ethics?践行良好的伦理道德意味着什么?
J Med Ethics. 2015 Jan;41(1):68-70. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102384.
2
Bioethics: why philosophy is essential for progress.生物伦理学:为何哲学对进步至关重要。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Jan;41(1):28-33. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102284.
3
A bioethics for all seasons.适用于所有情况的生物伦理学。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Jan;41(1):17-21. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102306.
4
Health care ethics consultation: an update on core competencies and emerging standards from the American Society For Bioethics and Humanities' core competencies update task force.医疗保健伦理学咨询:美国生物伦理学和人文科学协会核心能力更新工作组关于核心能力和新兴标准的最新更新。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(2):3-13. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.750388.
5
Core competencies for health care ethics consultants: in search of professional status in a post-modern world.医疗保健伦理顾问的核心能力:在后现代世界中寻求专业地位。
HEC Forum. 2011 Sep;23(3):129-45. doi: 10.1007/s10730-011-9167-4.
6
Why is the search for the foundations of ethics so frustrating?为何对伦理基础的探寻如此令人沮丧?
Hastings Cent Rep. 1979 Aug;9(4):16-22.