• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健伦理顾问的核心能力:在后现代世界中寻求专业地位。

Core competencies for health care ethics consultants: in search of professional status in a post-modern world.

作者信息

Engelhardt H Tristram

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Rice University, Houston, TX, 77251-1892, USA.

出版信息

HEC Forum. 2011 Sep;23(3):129-45. doi: 10.1007/s10730-011-9167-4.

DOI:10.1007/s10730-011-9167-4
PMID:21909689
Abstract

The American Society for Bioethics and the Humanities (ASBH) issued its Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation just as it is becoming ever clearer that secular ethics is intractably plural and without foundations in any reality that is not a social-historical construction (ASBH Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation, 2nd edn. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities, Glenview, IL, 2011). Core Competencies fails to recognize that the ethics of health care ethics consultants is not ethics in the usual sense of a morally canonical ethics. Its ethics is the ethics established at law and in enforceable health care public policy in a particular jurisdiction. Its normativity is a legal normativity, so that the wrongness of violating this ethics is simply the legal penalties involved and the likelihood of their being imposed. That the ethics of ethics consultation is that ethics legally established accounts for the circumstance that the major role of hospital ethics consultants is as quasi-lawyers giving legal advice, aiding in risk management, and engaging in mediation. It also indicates why this collage of roles has succeeded so well. This article shows how moral philosophy as it was reborn in the 13th century West led to the ethics of modernity and then finally to the ethics of hospital ethics consultation. It provides a brief history of the emergence of an ethics that is after morality. Against this background, the significance of Core Competencies must be critically reconsidered.

摘要

美国生物伦理与人文学会(ASBH)发布了其《医疗保健伦理咨询核心能力》,此时愈发明显的是,世俗伦理是难以驾驭的多元性的,且在任何并非社会历史建构的现实中都没有根基(《医疗保健伦理咨询核心能力》,第2版。美国生物伦理与人文学会,伊利诺伊州格伦维尤,2011年)。《核心能力》没有认识到,医疗保健伦理咨询师的伦理并非通常意义上道德规范伦理中的伦理。其伦理是在特定司法辖区的法律以及可执行的医疗保健公共政策中确立的伦理。其规范性是一种法律规范性,因此违反这种伦理的错误性仅仅在于所涉及的法律处罚以及被施加处罚的可能性。伦理咨询的伦理是依法确立的伦理,这一事实解释了医院伦理咨询师的主要角色是充当准律师提供法律建议、协助风险管理以及进行调解的情况。这也表明了为什么这一系列角色取得了如此大的成功。本文展示了13世纪西方重生的道德哲学是如何导致现代性伦理,进而最终导致医院伦理咨询伦理的。它简要介绍了一种后道德伦理的出现历史。在此背景下,必须对《核心能力》的重要性进行批判性重新审视。

相似文献

1
Core competencies for health care ethics consultants: in search of professional status in a post-modern world.医疗保健伦理顾问的核心能力:在后现代世界中寻求专业地位。
HEC Forum. 2011 Sep;23(3):129-45. doi: 10.1007/s10730-011-9167-4.
2
Health care ethics consultation: an update on core competencies and emerging standards from the American Society For Bioethics and Humanities' core competencies update task force.医疗保健伦理学咨询:美国生物伦理学和人文科学协会核心能力更新工作组关于核心能力和新兴标准的最新更新。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(2):3-13. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.750388.
3
The Core Competencies: a Roman Catholic critique.核心能力:一种罗马天主教的批判。
HEC Forum. 2011 Sep;23(3):147-69. doi: 10.1007/s10730-011-9169-2.
4
Structuring a written examination to assess ASBH health care ethics consultation core knowledge competencies.编写书面考试以评估 ASBH 医疗保健伦理咨询核心知识能力。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(1):5-17. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.861035.
5
Health care ethics consultation: nature, goals, and competencies. A position paper from the Society for Health and Human Values-Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation.医疗保健伦理咨询:性质、目标与能力。健康与人类价值协会 - 生物伦理咨询协会生物伦理咨询标准特别工作组的立场文件。
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Jul 4;133(1):59-69. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-1-200007040-00012.
6
The Advent of the Professional Ethicist: Moral Expertise and Health-Care Ethics Certification.专业伦理学家的出现:道德专业知识与医疗保健伦理认证。
Perspect Biol Med. 2020;63(3):570-588. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2020.0048.
7
Bioethics in the third millennium: some critical anticipations.第三个千年的生物伦理学:一些批判性的展望。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1999 Sep;9(3):225-43. doi: 10.1353/ken.1999.0018.
8
Trauma Informed Ethics Consultation.创伤知情伦理咨询
Am J Bioeth. 2022 May;22(5):45-57. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1887963. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
In defense of bioethics.为生物伦理学辩护。
J Law Med Ethics. 2009 Spring;37(1):83-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00353.x.
10
Competencies and Milestones for Bioethics Trainees: Beyond ASBH's Healthcare Ethics Certification and Core Competencies.生物伦理学培训生的能力和里程碑:超越 ASBH 的医疗保健伦理认证和核心能力。
J Clin Ethics. 2021 Summer;32(2):127-148.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study.临床伦理咨询决策中的情感反应:一项探索性研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 29;15(6):748. doi: 10.3390/bs15060748.
2
The Ethics of Clinical Ethics.临床伦理学的伦理
HEC Forum. 2025 Sep;37(3):389-410. doi: 10.1007/s10730-024-09544-3. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
3
Development and validation of a tool to assess researchers' knowledge of human subjects' rights and their attitudes toward research ethics education in Saudi Arabia.开发和验证一种工具,以评估沙特阿拉伯研究人员对人类受试者权利的了解及其对研究伦理教育的态度。

本文引用的文献

1
Confronting moral pluralism in posttraditional Western societies: bioethics critically reassessed.直面后传统西方社会中的道德多元主义:对生物伦理学的批判性再评估
J Med Philos. 2011 Jun;36(3):243-60. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr011. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
2
Credentialing strategically ambiguous and heterogeneous social skills: the emperor without clothes.认证具有策略性模糊和异质性的社交技能:皇帝没穿衣服。
HEC Forum. 2009 Sep;21(3):293-306. doi: 10.1007/s10730-009-9106-9.
3
Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: a national survey.美国医院的伦理咨询:一项全国性调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Nov 2;24(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00968-z.
4
Whose harm? Which metaphysic?谁的伤害?哪种形而上学?
Theor Med Bioeth. 2019 Feb;40(1):43-61. doi: 10.1007/s11017-019-09480-1.
5
The Pitfalls of Proceduralism: An Exploration of the Goods Internal to the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation.程序主义的陷阱:临床伦理咨询实践中的内在善之探究
HEC Forum. 2018 Dec;30(4):389-403. doi: 10.1007/s10730-018-9359-2.
6
Understanding and Resolving Conflicting Traditions: A MacIntyrean Approach to Shared Deliberation in Medical Ethics.理解与化解相互冲突的传统:一种麦金太尔式的医学伦理共同审议方法
HEC Forum. 2018 Mar;30(1):57-70. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9337-0.
7
Towards Substantive Standardization: Ethical Rules as Ethical Presumptions.迈向实质性标准化:作为伦理推定的伦理规则
HEC Forum. 2016 Jun;28(2):175-85. doi: 10.1007/s10730-015-9290-8.
8
Quality in ethics consultations.伦理咨询的质量。
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Nov;16(4):761-74. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9489-x.
9
500 hats: exploring the challenges of boundary and community--reflections on professionalization.500顶帽子:探索边界与社群的挑战——关于职业化的思考
HEC Forum. 2012 Sep;24(3):171-8. doi: 10.1007/s10730-012-9190-0.
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):13-25. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109085.
4
Does ethical theory have a future in bioethics?伦理理论在生物伦理学中还有未来吗?
J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Summer;32(2):209-17, 190. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00467.x.
5
The bioethics consultant: giving moral advice in the midst of moral controversy.生物伦理顾问:在道德争议中提供道德建议。
HEC Forum. 2003 Dec;15(4):362-82. doi: 10.1023/b:hecf.0000011977.07393.cf.
6
The breadth of bioethics: core areas of bioethics education for hospital ethics committees.生物伦理学的广度:医院伦理委员会生物伦理学教育的核心领域
J Med Philos. 2001 Feb;26(1):101-18. doi: 10.1076/jmep.26.1.101.3036.
7
Healthcare ethics committees: re-examining their social and moral functions.医疗伦理委员会:重新审视其社会和道德功能。
HEC Forum. 1999 Jun;11(2):87-100. doi: 10.1023/a:1008924324241.
8
Voices and time: the venture of clinical ethics.声音与时间:临床伦理学的探索
J Med Philos. 1993 Feb;18(1):9-31. doi: 10.1093/jmp/18.1.9.
9
The priesthood of bioethics and the return of casuistry.生物伦理学的神职人员与决疑法的回归。
J Med Philos. 1993 Feb;18(1):33-49. doi: 10.1093/jmp/18.1.33.
10
Ethics by committee: the moral authority of consensus.委员会制定的伦理规范:共识的道德权威
J Med Philos. 1988 Nov;13(4):411-32. doi: 10.1093/jmp/13.4.411.