• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

含碱性填料的大块充填树脂复合材料与分层纳米混合复合树脂的微拉伸粘结强度、边缘渗漏及抗菌效果

Microtensile Bond Strength, Marginal Leakage, and Antibacterial Effect of Bulk Fill Resin Composite with Alkaline Fillers versus Incremental Nanohybrid Composite Resin.

作者信息

Mohamed Nada Ismail, Safy Rehab Khalil, Elezz Ahmed Fawzy Abo

机构信息

Restorative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismalia, Egypt.

出版信息

Eur J Dent. 2021 Jul;15(3):425-432. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721310. Epub 2020 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1721310
PMID:33368067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8382449/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS), microleakage, and antibacterial effect of bulk fill resin composite with alkaline fillers (alkasite) (alkaline fillers such as barium aluminum silicate glass and ytterbium trifluoride) in comparison to incremental nanohybrid resin composite.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

µTBS was evaluated by using 30 human mandibular molars. Teeth were randomly divided into three groups (C): nanohybrid resin composite (C0), self-cured alkasite (C1), and dual-cured alkasite (C2). Each group was subdivided into two subgroups according to the bulk thickness: 4 mm (T1) and 6 mm (T2). The occlusal enamel of teeth was removed and the resin composite was applied to a flat dentin surface. Then, teeth were sectioned into beams to be tested under tension. For microleakage testing, mesio-occlusal class II cavities were prepared in 15 molars and divided into three groups as mentioned before. Following this, cavities were restored, thermocycled, immersed in a dye, sectioned mesiodistally, and then dye penetration was assessed. The antibacterial effect of both tested materials was evaluated using agar disc diffusion and broth dilution methods against chlorhexidine as a control positive group.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in µTBS between all tested groups. Bulk fill self-cured alkasite showed the lowest microleakage value followed by bulk fill dual-cured alkasite and incremental nanohybrid resin composite, respectively. Also, cervical microleakage showed significantly higher mean value than the occlusal one. The antibacterial effect of alkasite was less than chlorhexidine. Alkasite showed maximum broth clarity at lowest tested bacterial concentration.

CONCLUSION

Resin composite with alkaline fillers was characterized by good µTBS and marginal integrity with weak antibacterial effect.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查与传统纳米混合树脂复合材料相比,含碱性填料(碱式玻璃)(如硅酸钡铝玻璃和三氟化镱等碱性填料)的大块充填树脂复合材料的微拉伸粘结强度(µTBS)、微渗漏及抗菌效果。

材料与方法

使用30颗人类下颌磨牙评估µTBS。牙齿随机分为三组(C):纳米混合树脂复合材料(C0)、自固化碱式玻璃(C1)和双重固化碱式玻璃(C2)。根据充填厚度,每组再细分为两个亚组:4mm(T1)和6mm(T2)。去除牙齿的咬合面釉质,将树脂复合材料应用于平坦的牙本质表面。然后,将牙齿切成梁状以进行拉伸测试。对于微渗漏测试,在15颗磨牙上制备近中-咬合面II类洞,并按上述方法分为三组。之后,修复窝洞,进行热循环,浸入染料中,近远中向切片,然后评估染料渗透情况。使用琼脂扩散法和肉汤稀释法评估两种测试材料对作为对照阳性组的洗必泰的抗菌效果。

结果

所有测试组之间的µTBS无显著差异。大块充填自固化碱式玻璃的微渗漏值最低,其次分别是大块充填双重固化碱式玻璃和传统纳米混合树脂复合材料。此外,颈部微渗漏的平均值显著高于咬合面微渗漏。碱式玻璃的抗菌效果低于洗必泰。在最低测试细菌浓度下,碱式玻璃显示出最大的肉汤透明度。

结论

含碱性填料的树脂复合材料具有良好的µTBS和边缘完整性,但抗菌效果较弱。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fabc/8382449/142fc7d63f1c/10-1055-s-0040-1721310_9_1003_05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fabc/8382449/c7d5d552df8d/10-1055-s-0040-1721310_9_1003_01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fabc/8382449/bba7e0bd9086/10-1055-s-0040-1721310_9_1003_02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fabc/8382449/3f92a022efba/10-1055-s-0040-1721310_9_1003_03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fabc/8382449/ebe49fccedc5/10-1055-s-0040-1721310_9_1003_04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fabc/8382449/142fc7d63f1c/10-1055-s-0040-1721310_9_1003_05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fabc/8382449/c7d5d552df8d/10-1055-s-0040-1721310_9_1003_01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fabc/8382449/bba7e0bd9086/10-1055-s-0040-1721310_9_1003_02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fabc/8382449/3f92a022efba/10-1055-s-0040-1721310_9_1003_03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fabc/8382449/ebe49fccedc5/10-1055-s-0040-1721310_9_1003_04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fabc/8382449/142fc7d63f1c/10-1055-s-0040-1721310_9_1003_05.jpg

相似文献

1
Microtensile Bond Strength, Marginal Leakage, and Antibacterial Effect of Bulk Fill Resin Composite with Alkaline Fillers versus Incremental Nanohybrid Composite Resin.含碱性填料的大块充填树脂复合材料与分层纳米混合复合树脂的微拉伸粘结强度、边缘渗漏及抗菌效果
Eur J Dent. 2021 Jul;15(3):425-432. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721310. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
2
Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites.Ⅱ类洞修复体的微渗漏及低收缩复合树脂与牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度
Am J Dent. 2013 Oct;26(5):271-7.
3
Microleakage of Class II Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations Cured with Light-Emitting Diode versus Quartz Tungsten-Halogen Light: An In Vitro Study in Human Teeth.发光二极管与石英钨卤素灯固化的Ⅱ类大块充填树脂复合材料修复体的微渗漏:一项在人牙上的体外研究
Biomedicines. 2023 Feb 14;11(2):556. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11020556.
4
Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.II类大块充填复合树脂修复体的牙龈微渗漏
Dent Med Probl. 2018 Oct-Dec;55(4):383-388. doi: 10.17219/dmp/99264.
5
Microleakage of Class I and II Composite Resin Restorations Using a Sonic-resin Placement System.使用声波树脂填充系统的I类和II类复合树脂修复体的微渗漏
Oper Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;40(6):653-61. doi: 10.2341/15-006-L. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
6
Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.使用树脂基复合材料的两种不同修复技术对微渗漏的影响。
Am J Dent. 2004 Apr;17(2):99-103.
7
Microleakage of Two Bulk Fill and One Conventional Composite in Class II Restorations of Primary Posterior Teeth.两种大块充填和一种传统复合树脂在乳后牙Ⅱ类洞修复中的微渗漏
J Dent (Tehran). 2017 May;14(3):123-131.
8
Adhesiveness of bulk-fill composite resin in permanent molars submitted to Streptococcus mutans biofilm.大块充填型复合树脂在变形链球菌生物膜下永久磨牙的黏附性。
Braz Oral Res. 2019 Dec 2;33:e111. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0111. eCollection 2019.
9
Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.对磨牙牙尖运动和微渗漏评分的牙本质粘结系统及树脂基复合材料(常规型和大块充填型)修复体的修复方案的修改。
Dent Mater. 2018 Sep;34(9):1271-1277. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 30.
10
Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.弹性腔壁和咬合负荷对微渗漏及牙本质粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):466-75. doi: 10.2341/06-132.

引用本文的文献

1
An In Vitro Assessment of the Shear Bond Strength of Alkasite Restorative Material in Primary Molars Compared with Glass Ionomer and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorations.与玻璃离子体和树脂改性玻璃离子体修复材料相比,乳牙中碱土长石修复材料剪切粘结强度的体外评估
Materials (Basel). 2024 Dec 20;17(24):6230. doi: 10.3390/ma17246230.
2
Effect of Polywave and Monowave Light Curing Units on the Microtensile Bond Strength and Failure Types of Different Bulk-Fill Resin Composites: An in vitro Study.多波和单波光固化机对不同大块充填树脂复合材料微拉伸粘结强度及破坏类型的影响:一项体外研究。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2024 May 24;16:153-165. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S465226. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Different Disinfection Methods on Microleakage of Giomer Restorations.不同消毒方法对聚酸改性玻璃离子水门汀修复体微渗漏的影响
Eur J Dent. 2019 Oct;13(4):569-573. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1698370. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
2
investigation of antimicrobial effects, nanohardness, and cytotoxicity of different glass ionomer restorative materials in dentistry.牙科中不同玻璃离子修复材料的抗菌效果、纳米硬度和细胞毒性研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Mar;22(3):422-431. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_429_18.
3
Proximal contact tightness of class Ⅱ bulk-fill composite resin restorations: An in vitro study.
Comparative evaluation of long-term fluoride release and antibacterial activity of an alkasite, nanoionomer, and glass ionomer restorative material - An study.
碱土硅酸盐、纳米离子体和玻璃离子修复材料长期氟释放及抗菌活性的比较评价——一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Sep-Oct;24(5):485-490. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_336_21. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
4
Effect of Stress Generated by Occlusal Cyclic Force on Class I Bulk-Fill Composite Restoration Microleakage.咬合循环力产生的应力对Ⅰ类大块充填复合树脂修复体微渗漏的影响。
Eur J Dent. 2022 May;16(2):307-314. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735433. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
Ⅱ类大块充填复合树脂修复体的近中接触紧密性:一项体外研究。
Dent Mater J. 2019 Feb 8;38(1):96-100. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2017-279. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
4
Effect of adhesive mode and chlorhexidine on microtensile strength of universal bonding agent to sound and caries-affected dentins.粘结方式和氯己定对通用粘结剂与健康牙本质和龋损牙本质微拉伸强度的影响。
Eur J Dent. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):553-558. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_239_18.
5
The impact of artificially caries-affected dentin on bond strength of multi-mode adhesives.人工龋损牙本质对多模式粘结剂粘结强度的影响。
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Mar-Apr;21(2):136-141. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_234_17.
6
Dentin µTBS and Hardness of Bulk-fill and Conventional Composites Placed in a Box-shaped Cavity Preparation.块状充填和传统复合材料在盒状窝洞预备中牙本质 µTBS 和硬度的比较。
J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(5):395-400. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a39276.
7
Microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill restorative composites to dentin.大块充填修复性复合树脂与牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Aug 1;9(8):e1023-e1028. doi: 10.4317/jced.53965. eCollection 2017 Aug.
8
Bulk-Fill Composites: A Review of the Current Literature.大体积充填复合树脂:文献回顾。
J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(2):95-109. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a38141.
9
Comparative evaluation of the microtensile bond strength of bulk fill and low shrinkage composite for different depths of Class II cavities with the cervical margin in cementum: An study.牙骨质中具有颈部边缘的Ⅱ类洞不同深度处的大块充填和低收缩复合树脂微拉伸粘结强度的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2016 Nov-Dec;19(6):532-535. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.194023.
10
Effect of Dimethyl Sulfoxide on Bond Strength of a Self-Etch Primer and an Etch and Rinse Adhesive to Surface and Deep Dentin.二甲基亚砜对自酸蚀底漆及酸蚀冲洗型粘结剂与表层和深层牙本质粘结强度的影响。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2016 Sep;17(3 Suppl):242-249.