Suppr超能文献

单侧抗阻训练后肌肉力量的交叉训练:一项荟萃分析。

Cross-education of muscular strength following unilateral resistance training: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale S. Pietro 43/b, 07100, Sassari, Italy.

Department of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Nov;117(11):2335-2354. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3720-z. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Cross-education (CE) of strength is a well-known phenomenon whereby exercise of one limb can induce strength gains in the contralateral untrained limb. The only available meta-analyses on CE, which date back to a decade ago, estimated a modest 7.8% increase in contralateral strength following unilateral training. However, in recent years new evidences have outlined larger contralateral gains, which deserve to be systematically evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to appraise current data on CE and determine its overall magnitude of effect.

METHODS

Five databases were searched from inception to December 2016. All randomized controlled trials focusing on unilateral resistance training were carefully checked by two reviewers who also assessed the eligibility of the identified trials and extracted data independently. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies entered the meta-analysis. Data from 785 subjects were pooled and subgroup analyses by body region (upper/lower limb) and type of training (isometric/concentric/eccentric/isotonic-dynamic) were performed. The pooled estimate of CE was a significant 11.9% contralateral increase (95% CI 9.1-14.8; p < 0.00001; upper limb: + 9.4%, p < 0.00001; lower limb: + 16.4%, p < 0.00001). Significant CE effects were induced by isometric (8.2%; p = 0.0003), concentric (11.3%; p < 0.00001), eccentric (17.7%; p = 0.003) and isotonic-dynamic training (15.9%; p < 0.00001), although a high risk of bias was detected across the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral resistance training induces significant contraction type-dependent gains in the contralateral untrained limb. Methodological issues in the included studies are outlined to provide guidance for a reliable quantification of CE in future studies.

摘要

目的

交叉训练(CE)是一种众所周知的现象,即对一条肢体的锻炼可以使未受过训练的对侧肢体的力量增强。唯一可获得的关于 CE 的荟萃分析可以追溯到十年前,估计单侧训练后对侧力量增加了 7.8%。然而,近年来新的证据表明,对侧获得的收益更大,值得系统评估。因此,本荟萃分析的目的是评估当前关于 CE 的数据,并确定其总体效果量。

方法

从开始到 2016 年 12 月,我们在五个数据库中进行了搜索。两名评审员仔细检查了所有关注单侧抗阻训练的随机对照试验,他们还评估了确定试验的合格性,并独立提取数据。使用 Cochrane 风险偏倚工具评估风险偏倚。

结果

31 项研究进入荟萃分析。对来自 785 名受试者的数据进行了汇总,并根据身体区域(上肢/下肢)和训练类型(等长/向心/离心/等张动态)进行了亚组分析。CE 的合并估计值为 11.9%的显著对侧增加(95%置信区间 9.1-14.8;p<0.00001;上肢:+9.4%,p<0.00001;下肢:+16.4%,p<0.00001)。等长(8.2%;p=0.0003)、向心(11.3%;p<0.00001)、离心(17.7%;p=0.003)和等张动态训练(15.9%;p<0.00001)均能显著诱导 CE 效应,尽管研究中存在较高的偏倚风险。

结论

单侧抗阻训练可使未受训练的对侧肢体产生显著的收缩类型依赖性收益。列出纳入研究中的方法学问题,为未来研究中对 CE 的可靠量化提供指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验