Yao Zhihui, Wang Congxia, Zhang Qiaona, Ma Shan, Gui Baosong, Duan Chaoyang
Department of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710004, Shaanxi, China.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710004, Shaanxi, China.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Nov;49(11):2061-2069. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1685-9. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
To systematically determine the prevalence of abdominal artery calcification (AAC) in dialysis patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and identify reasons for heterogeneity.
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from database inception to March 2017. Cross-sectional or cohort (only used baseline data) studies reporting estimates of AAC prevalence in dialysis adult patients with ESRD were included. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to generate pooled prevalence estimates. Subgroup analyses were used to compare differences within categorical variables (geographic region, AAC detection instruments, dialysis methods, study design, and sample size), and meta-regression analyses to assess the impact of continuous variables (participants' age, duration of dialysis, and male proportion).
A total of 44 studies with 9883 dialysis patients were included. The pooled prevalence for AAC was 68.5% (95% CI 63-73.9%). Subgroup analyses suggested that AAC prevalence varied significantly by geographical region and AAC detection instruments, not by dialysis methods, study design and sample size. Meta-regression analysis suggested that positive correlations were found between AAC prevalence and the age of participants as well as the male proportion (r = 1.01477, P = 0.002 and r = 2.034413, P = 0.01, respectively), but not with the duration of dialysis (P = 0.576).
The pooled and nearest estimate of AAC prevalence among dialysis patients was as high as 65%. Geographical region, AAC detection instruments, age of participants, and male proportion potentially lead to the high variance of the reported prevalence. Considering the high AAC prevalence, effective treatment for preventing vascular calcification in these patients is badly needed.
系统地确定终末期肾病(ESRD)透析患者腹部动脉钙化(AAC)的患病率,并找出异质性的原因。
我们检索了从数据库建立到2017年3月的PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science。纳入报告ESRD成年透析患者AAC患病率估计值的横断面或队列研究(仅使用基线数据)。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析以生成合并患病率估计值。亚组分析用于比较分类变量(地理区域、AAC检测仪器、透析方法、研究设计和样本量)内的差异,荟萃回归分析用于评估连续变量(参与者年龄、透析时间和男性比例)的影响。
共纳入44项研究,涉及9883例透析患者。AAC的合并患病率为68.5%(95%CI 63 - 73.9%)。亚组分析表明,AAC患病率因地理区域和AAC检测仪器而异,而不因透析方法、研究设计和样本量而异。荟萃回归分析表明,AAC患病率与参与者年龄以及男性比例呈正相关(r = 1.01477,P = 0.002和r = 2.034413,P = 0.01),但与透析时间无关(P = 0.576)。
透析患者AAC患病率的合并和最接近估计值高达65%。地理区域、AAC检测仪器、参与者年龄和男性比例可能导致报告患病率的高差异。鉴于AAC患病率较高,迫切需要有效的治疗方法来预防这些患者的血管钙化。