• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同分散性眼科手术黏弹剂对角膜润湿性能的比较:一项光学相干断层扫描研究。

COMPARISON OF CORNEAL WETTING PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT DISPERSIVE OPHTHALMIC VISCOSURGICAL DEVICES: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey.

Department of Ophthalmology, Zile State Hospital, Tokat, Turkey.

出版信息

Retina. 2018 Nov;38(11):2137-2142. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001854.

DOI:10.1097/IAE.0000000000001854
PMID:28937526
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare corneal wetting performances of different dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical devices.

METHODS

Three different types of dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical devices, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose %2 (HPMC), sodium hyaluronate %3-sodium chondroitin sulphate %4 (HACS), and sodium hyaluronate %3 (HA), were applied on corneal surfaces of 10 healthy volunteer subjects repeatedly at 3 different time points. Corneal wetting properties of the ophthalmic viscosurgical devices were compared qualitatively and quantitatively by anterior segment optical coherence tomography for 30 minutes.

RESULTS

Sodium hyaluronate 3% and HACS applications had a higher mean precorneal ophthalmic viscosurgical device thickness than HPMC application at all time points (seventh minute HPMC: 105.2 ± 25.3 μm, HA: 561.4 ± 115.8 μm, HACS: 481.2 ± 55 μm, P < 0.001). All HPMC applications were terminated by the 12th minute because of insufficient corneal wetting. Mean survival estimate time was significantly shortest for HPMC (11.5 ± 0.5 minutes, P < 0.001) and longest for HA (29.7 ± 0.28 minutes). It was slightly shorter for HACS (26.9 ± 0.87 minutes, P = 0.007) than the HA application.

CONCLUSION

Sodium hyaluronate 3% and HACS provide superior corneal covering compared with HPMC with an effect that can be maintained up to 30 minutes. They may be an effective option for corneal wetting during long vitreoretinal surgeries with longer duration of effect and fever number of applications.

摘要

目的

比较不同的分散性眼科黏弹剂对角膜润湿性能的影响。

方法

将三种不同类型的分散性眼科黏弹剂(羟丙基甲基纤维素 2%[HPMC]、透明质酸钠 3-硫酸软骨素 4%[HACS]和透明质酸钠 3%[HA])分别在 10 名健康志愿者的角膜表面重复应用 3 次,每次间隔 3 分钟。通过眼前节光学相干断层扫描,对角膜表面黏弹剂的润湿性进行定性和定量比较,共持续 30 分钟。

结果

在所有时间点,透明质酸钠 3%和 HACS 的角膜前黏弹剂厚度均明显高于 HPMC(第 7 分钟 HPMC:105.2±25.3μm;HA:561.4±115.8μm;HACS:481.2±55μm,P<0.001)。由于角膜润湿不足,所有 HPMC 应用在第 12 分钟均停止。HPMC 的平均存活时间估计最短(11.5±0.5 分钟,P<0.001),HA 的平均存活时间最长(29.7±0.28 分钟)。HACS 的平均存活时间稍短(26.9±0.87 分钟,P=0.007)。

结论

与 HPMC 相比,透明质酸钠 3%和 HACS 能提供更好的角膜覆盖效果,作用可持续 30 分钟。在持续时间更长、应用次数更多的玻璃体视网膜手术中,它们可能是一种有效的角膜润湿选择。

相似文献

1
COMPARISON OF CORNEAL WETTING PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT DISPERSIVE OPHTHALMIC VISCOSURGICAL DEVICES: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.不同分散性眼科手术黏弹剂对角膜润湿性能的比较:一项光学相干断层扫描研究。
Retina. 2018 Nov;38(11):2137-2142. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001854.
2
Comparison of the effect of sodium hyaluronate (Ophthalin) and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC-Ophtal) on corneal endothelium, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification.透明质酸钠(Ophthalin)和羟丙基甲基纤维素(HPMC-Ophtal)对白内障超声乳化术后角膜内皮、中央角膜厚度及眼压影响的比较。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar-Apr;16(2):239-46. doi: 10.1177/112067210601600208.
3
Protective effect of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices on corneal endothelial cells during phacoemulsification: rabbit model.不同眼科黏弹剂在白内障超声乳化术中对角膜内皮细胞的保护作用:兔模型。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Nov;36(11):1972-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.023.
4
Efficacy of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in maintaining corneal epithelial hydration and clarity: in vitro assessment.眼用黏弹剂在维持角膜上皮水化和透明性中的疗效:体外评估。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Dec;38(12):2154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.06.054.
5
A clinical comparison between DisCoVisc and 2% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose in phacoemulsification: a fellow eye study.超声乳化手术中 DisCoVisc 与 2%羟丙基甲基纤维素的临床对比:同眼研究。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012 Sep;67(9):1059-62. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(09)13.
6
Impact of intraoperative topical hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 2% versus sodium hyaluronate 1.2% on corneal reepithelialization after intentional epithelial debridement during vitrectomy.玻璃体切除术中有意性角膜上皮刮除术后应用 2%羟丙基甲基纤维素和 1.2%透明质酸钠对角膜再上皮化的影响。
Cornea. 2014 Sep;33(9):942-5. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000201.
7
Efficacy of Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices in Preventing Temperature Rise at the Corneal Endothelium during Phacoemulsification.眼科粘弹手术器械在白内障超声乳化术中预防角膜内皮温度升高的效果
Curr Eye Res. 2016 Dec;41(12):1548-1552. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1136420. Epub 2016 May 23.
8
Protective effect of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices on corneal endothelium during severe phacoemulsification model in rabbits.不同眼科粘弹剂在兔重度超声乳化模型中对角膜内皮的保护作用
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011 Mar-Apr;42(2):152-6. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20110125-01. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
9
Quantitative assessment of ophthalmic viscosurgical device retention using in vivo confocal microscopy.使用体内共聚焦显微镜对眼科粘弹手术器械残留进行定量评估。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Dec;31(12):2363-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.05.032.
10
Ophthalmic viscosurgical devices.眼科粘弹手术器械
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan;19(1):50-4. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282f14db0.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative Assessment of Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices on Visibility, Spreadability, and Durability as Corneal Wetting Agents for the Wet Shell Technique.眼科粘弹手术器械作为湿壳技术角膜湿润剂在可见性、铺展性和耐久性方面的定量评估。
Ophthalmol Ther. 2020 Sep;9(3):609-623. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00273-7. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
2
Addition Of D-Sorbitol Improves The Usability Of Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices.添加 D-山梨醇可提高眼科粘弹手术器械的可用性。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep 23;13:1877-1885. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S218675. eCollection 2019.