Department of Ophthalmology, Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey.
Department of Ophthalmology, Zile State Hospital, Tokat, Turkey.
Retina. 2018 Nov;38(11):2137-2142. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001854.
To compare corneal wetting performances of different dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical devices.
Three different types of dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical devices, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose %2 (HPMC), sodium hyaluronate %3-sodium chondroitin sulphate %4 (HACS), and sodium hyaluronate %3 (HA), were applied on corneal surfaces of 10 healthy volunteer subjects repeatedly at 3 different time points. Corneal wetting properties of the ophthalmic viscosurgical devices were compared qualitatively and quantitatively by anterior segment optical coherence tomography for 30 minutes.
Sodium hyaluronate 3% and HACS applications had a higher mean precorneal ophthalmic viscosurgical device thickness than HPMC application at all time points (seventh minute HPMC: 105.2 ± 25.3 μm, HA: 561.4 ± 115.8 μm, HACS: 481.2 ± 55 μm, P < 0.001). All HPMC applications were terminated by the 12th minute because of insufficient corneal wetting. Mean survival estimate time was significantly shortest for HPMC (11.5 ± 0.5 minutes, P < 0.001) and longest for HA (29.7 ± 0.28 minutes). It was slightly shorter for HACS (26.9 ± 0.87 minutes, P = 0.007) than the HA application.
Sodium hyaluronate 3% and HACS provide superior corneal covering compared with HPMC with an effect that can be maintained up to 30 minutes. They may be an effective option for corneal wetting during long vitreoretinal surgeries with longer duration of effect and fever number of applications.
比较不同的分散性眼科黏弹剂对角膜润湿性能的影响。
将三种不同类型的分散性眼科黏弹剂(羟丙基甲基纤维素 2%[HPMC]、透明质酸钠 3-硫酸软骨素 4%[HACS]和透明质酸钠 3%[HA])分别在 10 名健康志愿者的角膜表面重复应用 3 次,每次间隔 3 分钟。通过眼前节光学相干断层扫描,对角膜表面黏弹剂的润湿性进行定性和定量比较,共持续 30 分钟。
在所有时间点,透明质酸钠 3%和 HACS 的角膜前黏弹剂厚度均明显高于 HPMC(第 7 分钟 HPMC:105.2±25.3μm;HA:561.4±115.8μm;HACS:481.2±55μm,P<0.001)。由于角膜润湿不足,所有 HPMC 应用在第 12 分钟均停止。HPMC 的平均存活时间估计最短(11.5±0.5 分钟,P<0.001),HA 的平均存活时间最长(29.7±0.28 分钟)。HACS 的平均存活时间稍短(26.9±0.87 分钟,P=0.007)。
与 HPMC 相比,透明质酸钠 3%和 HACS 能提供更好的角膜覆盖效果,作用可持续 30 分钟。在持续时间更长、应用次数更多的玻璃体视网膜手术中,它们可能是一种有效的角膜润湿选择。