• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding the Potential for Patient Engagement in Electronic Consultation and Referral Systems: Lessons From One Safety Net System.理解患者在电子咨询和转诊系统中的参与潜力:来自一个安全网系统的经验教训。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2483-2502. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12776. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
2
Understanding Caregiver Perspectives on an Electronic Consultation and Referral System.了解照顾者对电子咨询和转诊系统的看法。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2022 Mar;61(3):270-279. doi: 10.1177/00099228221074856. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
3
Parent Perspectives on Family-Centered Pediatric Electronic Consultations: Qualitative Study.家长对以家庭为中心的儿科电子会诊的看法:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 9;22(4):e16954. doi: 10.2196/16954.
4
Not perfect, but better: primary care providers' experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system.不完美,但更好:初级保健提供者在安全网医疗体系中使用电子转诊的体验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 May;24(5):614-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0955-3. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
5
Leveraging an electronic referral system to build a medical neighborhood.利用电子转诊系统构建医疗社区。
Healthc (Amst). 2015 Dec;3(4):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 2.
6
Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations.实施电子转诊和/或会诊系统的促进因素和障碍:对16个卫生组织的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 19;15:568. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1233-1.
7
Provider interaction with the electronic health record: the effects on patient-centered communication in medical encounters.医疗服务提供者与电子健康记录的交互:对医疗问诊中以患者为中心的沟通的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 14.
8
Towards successful coordination of electronic health record based-referrals: a qualitative analysis.迈向成功协调基于电子健康记录的转诊:定性分析。
Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 27;6:84. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-84.
9
Improving primary care-specialty care communication: lessons from San Francisco's safety net: comment on "Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians".改善基层医疗与专科医疗之间的沟通:来自旧金山安全网的经验教训:对《基层医疗医生与专科医生之间的转诊及会诊沟通》的评论
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jan 10;171(1):65-7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.484.
10
Culturally and linguistically diverse oncology patients' perspectives of consultation audio-recordings and question prompt lists.文化和语言多样化的肿瘤患者对咨询录音和问题提示清单的看法。
Psychooncology. 2018 Sep;27(9):2180-2188. doi: 10.1002/pon.4789. Epub 2018 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of digital interdisciplinary consultation on secondary care referrals by general practitioners: a protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.数字跨学科咨询对全科医生二级保健转诊的影响:一项基于阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 1;12(12):e060222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060222.
2
Perceived Factors Influencing the Public Intention to Use E-Consultation: Analysis of Web-Based Survey Data.公众使用电子咨询的意愿的感知影响因素:基于网络调查数据的分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e21834. doi: 10.2196/21834.
3
Parent Perspectives on Family-Centered Pediatric Electronic Consultations: Qualitative Study.家长对以家庭为中心的儿科电子会诊的看法:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 9;22(4):e16954. doi: 10.2196/16954.
4
Electronic consultations (E-consults) and their outcomes: a systematic review.电子咨询(E-consults)及其结果:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Mar 1;27(3):471-479. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz185.
5
Barriers and facilitators for implementation of electronic consultations (eConsult) to enhance access to specialist care: a scoping review.实施电子会诊(eConsult)以增加专科护理可及性的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Sep 13;4(5):e001629. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001629. eCollection 2019.
6
Evaluating diverse electronic consultation programs with a common framework.使用通用框架评估多样化的电子咨询项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 24;18(1):814. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3626-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Electronic Preconsultation as a Method of Quality Improvement for Urological Referrals.电子预会诊作为改善泌尿外科转诊质量的一种方法。
Urol Pract. 2014 Nov;1(4):172-175. doi: 10.1016/j.urpr.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
2
Electronic consultation systems: worldwide prevalence and their impact on patient care-a systematic review.电子会诊系统:全球患病率及其对患者护理的影响——一项系统综述
Fam Pract. 2016 Jun;33(3):274-85. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw024. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
3
Electronic Consultations to Improve the Primary Care-Specialty Care Interface for Cardiology in the Medically Underserved: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.电子咨询改善医疗资源不足地区心脏病学初级保健与专科医疗的衔接:一项整群随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Mar;14(2):133-40. doi: 10.1370/afm.1869.
4
Leveraging an electronic referral system to build a medical neighborhood.利用电子转诊系统构建医疗社区。
Healthc (Amst). 2015 Dec;3(4):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 2.
5
Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations.实施电子转诊和/或会诊系统的促进因素和障碍:对16个卫生组织的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 19;15:568. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1233-1.
6
Impact of and Satisfaction with a New eConsult Service: A Mixed Methods Study of Primary Care Providers.一项针对初级保健提供者的新电子咨询服务的影响及满意度:混合方法研究
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun;28(3):394-403. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140255.
7
Patients' Perspectives on Wait Times and the Referral-Consultation Process While Attending a Tertiary Diabetes and Endocrinology Centre: Is Econsultation an Acceptable Option?患者在 tertiary diabetes and endocrinology centre 就诊时对等候时间和转诊咨询流程的看法:电子咨询是否是一种可接受的选择?
Can J Diabetes. 2015 Aug;39(4):325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.12.010. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
8
From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider.从三重目标到四重目标:照顾患者需要照顾医疗服务提供者。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):573-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1713.
9
eReferral--a new model for integrated care.电子转诊——综合医疗的新模式。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 27;368(26):2450-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1215594.
10
Preconsultation exchange for ambulatory hepatology consultations.门诊肝病会诊的预咨询交流。
Am J Med. 2013 Jun;126(6):523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.12.019. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

理解患者在电子咨询和转诊系统中的参与潜力:来自一个安全网系统的经验教训。

Understanding the Potential for Patient Engagement in Electronic Consultation and Referral Systems: Lessons From One Safety Net System.

机构信息

Center for Excellence in Primary Care, Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94110.

University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2483-2502. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12776. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12776
PMID:28940495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6051985/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand patient, primary care clinician (PCC), and subspecialist perspectives on potential, unexplored roles for patients in electronic consultation and referral (eCR) systems.

DATA SOURCES

Primary focus group and survey data collected April-November 2015. Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (ZSFG) is part of an integrated public health delivery system. Its mature eCR system was first implemented in 2005.

STUDY DESIGN

This mixed-methods study synthesizes patient, subspecialist, and PCC perspectives through two patient focus groups in English, Spanish, and Cantonese (n = 6); subspecialist focus groups (n = 2); and an electronic survey of all PCCs (n = 222/634, 35 percent response).

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed. Two researchers coded the transcripts to identify recurrent themes. Survey data were analyzed using summary and bivariate statistics.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Patients expressed minimal desire to directly engage in eCR, instead of emphasizing their PCC's role in advocating, informing, and finding health solutions. Subspecialists requested more consistent communication to patients about the electronic consultation process. Most PCCs (52 percent) supported patient engagement in the eCR process, particularly patient ability to track consult status and securely message with subspecialists.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest a continuum of opportunities for patients and their caregivers to engage in eCR systems.

摘要

目的

了解患者、初级保健临床医生(PCC)和专家对患者在电子咨询和转介(eCR)系统中潜在的、未被探索的角色的看法。

资料来源

2015 年 4 月至 11 月期间收集的主要焦点小组和调查数据。Zuckerberg 旧金山总医院(ZSFG)是一个综合公共卫生服务系统的一部分。其成熟的 eCR 系统于 2005 年首次实施。

研究设计

这项混合方法研究通过在英语、西班牙语和粤语中进行的两次患者焦点小组(n=6)、专家焦点小组(n=2)以及对所有 PCC 的电子调查(n=222/634,35%的回应),综合了患者、专家和 PCC 的观点。

资料收集/提取方法:焦点小组进行了录音和转录。两位研究人员对这些抄本进行了编码,以确定反复出现的主题。使用总结和双变量统计对调查数据进行了分析。

主要发现

患者表示对直接参与 eCR 的意愿极小,而不是强调他们的 PCC 在倡导、告知和寻找健康解决方案方面的作用。专家要求与患者就电子咨询过程进行更一致的沟通。大多数 PCC(52%)支持患者参与 eCR 过程,特别是患者能够跟踪咨询状态并与专家安全地交流。

结论

结果表明患者及其照顾者在 eCR 系统中有一系列参与的机会。