Suppr超能文献

营养不良儿童急性胃肠炎伴重度脱水的静脉补液:一项系统评价。

Intravenous rehydration of malnourished children with acute gastroenteritis and severe dehydration: A systematic review.

作者信息

Houston Kirsty A, Gibb Jack G, Maitland Kathryn

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, W2 1PG, UK.

KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya.

出版信息

Wellcome Open Res. 2017 Aug 18;2:65. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.12346.1. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Rehydration strategies in children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) and severe dehydration are extremely cautious. The World Health Organization (WHO) SAM guidelines advise strongly against intravenous fluids unless the child is shocked or severely dehydrated and unable to tolerate oral fluids. Otherwise, guidelines recommend oral or nasogastric rehydration using low sodium oral rehydration solutions. There is limited evidence to support these recommendations. We conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on 15 June 2017 comparing different strategies of rehydration therapy in children with acute gastroenteritis and severe dehydration, specifically relating to intravenous rehydration, using standard search terms. Two authors assessed papers for inclusion. The primary endpoint was evidence of fluid overload. Four studies were identified, all published in English, including 883 children, all of which were conducted in low resource settings. Two were randomised controlled trials and two observational cohort studies, one incorporated assessment of myocardial and haemodynamic function. There was no evidence of fluid overload or other fluid-related adverse events, including children managed on more liberal rehydration protocols. Mortality was high overall, and particularly in children with shock managed on WHO recommendations (day-28 mortality 82%). There was no difference in safety outcomes when different rates of intravenous rehydration were compared. The current 'strong recommendations' for conservative rehydration of children with SAM are not based on emerging evidence. We found no clinical trials providing a direct assessment of the current WHO guidelines, and those that were available suggested that these children have a high mortality and remain fluid depleted on current therapy. Recent studies have reported no evidence of fluid overload or heart failure with more liberal rehydration regimens. Clinical trials are urgently required to inform guidelines on routes and rates of intravenous rehydration therapy for dehydration in children with SAM.

摘要

对患有严重急性营养不良(SAM)和严重脱水的儿童进行补液时需格外谨慎。世界卫生组织(WHO)的SAM指南强烈反对静脉输液,除非儿童出现休克或严重脱水且无法耐受口服补液。否则,指南建议使用低钠口服补液溶液进行口服或鼻胃管补液。支持这些建议的证据有限。2017年6月15日,我们使用标准检索词对随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究进行了系统评价,比较了急性胃肠炎和严重脱水儿童不同的补液治疗策略,特别是与静脉补液相关的策略。两位作者评估论文是否纳入。主要终点是液体过载的证据。共识别出四项研究,均以英文发表,涉及883名儿童,所有研究均在资源匮乏地区进行。两项为随机对照试验,两项为观察性队列研究,其中一项纳入了心肌和血流动力学功能评估。没有证据表明存在液体过载或其他与液体相关的不良事件,包括采用更宽松补液方案治疗的儿童。总体死亡率很高,尤其是按照WHO建议治疗的休克儿童(28天死亡率为82%)。比较不同静脉补液速率时,安全结果没有差异。目前对SAM儿童进行保守补液的“强烈建议”并非基于新出现的证据。我们没有找到直接评估当前WHO指南的临床试验,现有研究表明这些儿童死亡率很高,且在当前治疗下仍存在液体不足。最近的研究报告称,采用更宽松的补液方案没有液体过载或心力衰竭的证据。迫切需要进行临床试验,为SAM儿童脱水的静脉补液治疗途径和速率的指南提供依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c157/5590082/38f29af78c25/wellcomeopenres-2-13368-g0000.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验