• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性阑尾炎诊断方法的准确性。

Accuracies of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis.

作者信息

Park Jong Seob, Jeong Jin Ho, Lee Jong In, Lee Jong Hoon, Park Jea Kun, Moon Hyoun Jong

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Myongji Hospital, Kwandong University, Goyang, Korea.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2013 Jan;79(1):101-6.

PMID:23317620
Abstract

The objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and physical examination for diagnosing acute appendicitis with analyzing their accuracies and negative appendectomy rates in a clinical rather than research setting. A total of 2763 subjects were enrolled. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value and negative appendectomy rate for ultrasonography, computed tomography, and physical examination were calculated. Confirmed positive acute appendicitis was defined based on pathologic findings, and confirmed negative acute appendicitis was defined by pathologic findings as well as on clinical follow-up. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for ultrasonography were 99.1, 91.7, 96.5, and 97.7 per cent, respectively; for computed tomography, 96.4, 95.4, 95.6, and 96.3 per cent, respectively; and for physical examination, 99.0, 76.1, 88.1, and 97.6 per cent, respectively. The negative appendectomy rate was 5.8 per cent (5.2% in the ultrasonography group, 4.3% in the computed tomography group, and 12.2% in the physical examination group). Ultrasonography/computed tomography should be performed routinely for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. However, in view of its advantages, ultrasonography should be performed first. Also, if the result of a physical examination is negative, imaging studies after physical examination can be unnecessary.

摘要

目的是在临床而非研究环境中,通过分析超声检查、计算机断层扫描和体格检查诊断急性阑尾炎的准确性及阴性阑尾切除率,来评估它们的有效性。共纳入2763名受试者。计算了超声检查、计算机断层扫描和体格检查的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及阴性阑尾切除率。确诊的阳性急性阑尾炎基于病理结果定义,确诊的阴性急性阑尾炎则由病理结果以及临床随访定义。超声检查的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为99.1%、91.7%、96.5%和97.7%;计算机断层扫描分别为96.4%、95.4%、95.6%和96.3%;体格检查分别为99.0%、76.1%、88.1%和97.6%。阴性阑尾切除率为5.8%(超声检查组为5.2%,计算机断层扫描组为4.3%,体格检查组为12.2%)。应常规进行超声检查/计算机断层扫描以诊断急性阑尾炎。然而,鉴于其优势,应首先进行超声检查。此外,如果体格检查结果为阴性,则体格检查后可能无需进行影像学检查。

相似文献

1
Accuracies of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎诊断方法的准确性。
Am Surg. 2013 Jan;79(1):101-6.
2
Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates.疑似阑尾炎的影像学检查:阴性阑尾切除术及穿孔率
Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):131-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2251011780.
3
Can computed tomography scan be performed effectively in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis without the added morbidity of rectal contrast?在不增加直肠造影剂相关并发症的情况下,计算机断层扫描能否有效地用于急性阑尾炎的诊断?
Am Surg. 2008 Oct;74(10):917-20.
4
Negative appendicectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and Alvarado score.阴性阑尾切除术:超声检查与阿尔瓦拉多评分的评估
Cent Afr J Med. 2015 Sep-Dec;61(9-12):66-73.
5
Abdominal computed tomography in the evaluation of acute and perforated appendicitis in the community setting.社区环境下腹部计算机断层扫描在急性及穿孔性阑尾炎评估中的应用
Am Surg. 2007 Oct;73(10):1002-5.
6
The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a pediatric population: to CT or not to CT.儿科人群中急性阑尾炎的诊断:是否采用CT检查
J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Mar;38(3):367-71; discsussion 367-71. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2003.50110.
7
[Fewer unnecessary appendectomies following ultrasonography and CT].[超声检查和CT检查后不必要的阑尾切除术减少]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A869.
8
Suspected appendicitis in children: US and CT--a prospective randomized study.儿童疑似阑尾炎:超声与CT——一项前瞻性随机研究
Radiology. 2002 Jun;223(3):633-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2233011076.
9
Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates.阑尾炎:计算机断层扫描成像对阴性阑尾切除术和穿孔率的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 May;93(5):768-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.222_a.x.
10
The diagnosis of appendicitis in children: outcomes of a strategy based on pediatric surgical evaluation.儿童阑尾炎的诊断:基于小儿外科评估策略的结果
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 1):29-34. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.1.29.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing the dynamics of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic in Seoul, Korea: a multifaceted time series approach.分析韩国首尔 COVID-19 大流行期间复杂和简单阑尾炎的动态:多方面时间序列方法。
Epidemiol Health. 2024;46:e2024081. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2024081. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
2
Clinical scores (Alvarado and AIR scores) versus imaging (ultrasound and CT scan) in the diagnosis of equivocal cases of acute appendicitis: a randomized controlled study.临床评分(阿尔瓦拉多评分和AIR评分)与影像学检查(超声和CT扫描)在诊断可疑急性阑尾炎病例中的比较:一项随机对照研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Mar 14;85(4):676-683. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000270. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Evaluation of the Rho-kinase gene expression and polymorphisms in adult patients with acute appendicitis: a differential impact of gender.
评价 Rho-激酶基因表达和多态性在成年急性阑尾炎患者中的作用:性别差异的影响。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2022 Nov 21;68(10):1464-1469. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220777. eCollection 2022.
4
Accuracy of emergency physician bedside ultrasonography compared with private teleradiologist for acute appendicitis diagnosis.急诊医师床边超声与私人远程放射科医师对急性阑尾炎诊断的准确性比较。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Jun;192(3):1473-1479. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03149-w. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of modified RIPASA and MASS in patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis in Suez Canal University Hospital Emergency Department: a cross-sectional study.比较改良 RIPASA 和 MASS 在苏伊士运河大学医院急诊科诊断为急性阑尾炎的患者中的诊断准确性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 8;22(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00677-7.
6
DIALAPP: a prospective validation of a new diagnostic algorithm for acute appendicitis.DIALAPP:一种新的急性阑尾炎诊断算法的前瞻性验证。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Feb;406(1):141-152. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02022-7. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
7
A Cross-Sectional Study of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Hospital Melaka.马六甲医院中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值诊断急性阑尾炎的横断面研究
Malays J Med Sci. 2019 Nov;26(6):55-66. doi: 10.21315/mjms2019.26.6.6. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
8
Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults.成人急性阑尾炎诊断的计算机断层扫描
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 19;2019(11):CD009977. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009977.pub2.
9
An Ulcerated Ileal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Disguised as Acute Appendicitis.一例伪装成急性阑尾炎的溃疡性回肠胃肠道间质瘤
Case Rep Surg. 2018 Jun 5;2018:1320107. doi: 10.1155/2018/1320107. eCollection 2018.
10
Evaluation of the Alvarado scoring system in the management of acute appendicitis.阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在急性阑尾炎管理中的评估
Turk J Surg. 2017 Sep 1;33(3):200-204. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3539. eCollection 2017.