Matarese Giovanni, Ramaglia Luca, Cicciù Marco, Cordasco Giancarlo, Isola Gaetano
1 Department of Biomedical, Odontostomatological Sciences and of Morphological and Functional Images, School of Dentistry, University of Messina , Messina, Italy .
2 Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II" , Naples, Italy .
Photomed Laser Surg. 2017 Dec;35(12):702-709. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4288. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the clinical, microbial, and inflammatory effects of a diode laser as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) versus SRP alone for the treatment of generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAgP).
Using a split-mouth design, 31 patients with GAgP were enrolled in the study. The maxillary right and left quadrants were randomly assigned to SRP+diode laser or SRP alone. Patients were examined on a regular basis for clinical, microbiological, and inflammatory mediator changes over a 1-year period. Clinical attachment level (CAL) was the primary outcome variable chosen. In addition, subgingival biofilm samples and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) inflammatory mediators were analyzed at each follow-up session.
Compared to baseline, both treatments demonstrated an improvement in periodontal parameters at 1 year. However, SRP+diode laser produced a significant improvement in probing depth (PD; 2.56 ± 0.44 vs. 3.36 ± 0.51 mm, p < 0.05) and CAL (3.47 ± 0.25 vs. 4.11 ± 0.26 mm, p < 0.05) values compared to SRP alone. Similarly, in the SRP+diode laser group, the bacteria of orange complex group were significantly reduced at 30 and 60 days compared to SRP alone. Moreover, SRP+diode laser determined a reduction in mean GCF level of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-1β/IL-10 ratio at 15 and 30 days compared to SRP alone (p < 0.05).
At 1 year, SRP+diode laser yielded a significant reduction in some clinical parameters, while microbial and inflammatory mediator changes were not significantly reduced compared to SRP alone.
本研究旨在调查并比较二极管激光辅助龈下刮治术和根面平整术(SRP)与单纯SRP治疗广泛侵袭性牙周炎(GAgP)的临床、微生物学及炎症方面的效果。
采用自身对照设计,31例GAgP患者纳入本研究。患者的上颌左右象限随机分为SRP联合二极管激光组或单纯SRP组。在1年的时间里定期检查患者的临床、微生物学及炎症介质变化。临床附着水平(CAL)是选定的主要观察变量。此外,在每次随访时分析龈下生物膜样本和龈沟液(GCF)中的炎症介质。
与基线相比,两种治疗方法在1年时牙周参数均有改善。然而,与单纯SRP相比,SRP联合二极管激光组的探诊深度(PD;2.56±0.44对3.36±0.51mm,p<0.05)和CAL(3.47±0.25对4.11±0.26mm,p<0.05)值有显著改善。同样,与单纯SRP相比,SRP联合二极管激光组在30天和60天时橙色复合体组细菌显著减少。此外,与单纯SRP相比,SRP联合二极管激光组在15天和30天时龈沟液中白细胞介素(IL)-1β平均水平及IL-1β/IL-10比值降低(p<0.05)。
在1年时,SRP联合二极管激光在一些临床参数上有显著降低,而与单纯SRP相比,微生物及炎症介质变化没有显著减少。