• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过智能手机应用程序筛查与创伤相关的症状:Smart Assessment on your Mobile 在转介警官中的有效性。

Screening for trauma-related symptoms via a smartphone app: The validity of Smart Assessment on your Mobile in referred police officers.

机构信息

Academic Medical Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Interapy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017 Sep;26(3). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1579.

DOI:10.1002/mpr.1579
PMID:28948699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5639363/
Abstract

To facilitate easily accessible screening for trauma-related symptoms, a web-based application called Smart Assessment on your Mobile (SAM) was developed. In this study, we examined whether SAM was able to accurately identify posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression in adults. Eighty-nine referred police officers completed SAM, containing the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 (PCL-5) and the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), on their own device prior to a diagnostic interview where the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I/P) were administered. Results showed a substantial agreement between SAM and the diagnostic interview in the assessment of PTSD and depression. An optimal trade-off between sensitivity (89%) and specificity (68%) levels was found at a cut-off score of 31 on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (area under the curve = 0.845, 95% CI [0.765, 0.925], diagnostic odds ratio = 15.97). This is one of the first studies to support the validity and reliability of a mobile screener following trauma. SAM may facilitate screening for trauma-related symptoms on a large scale and could be a first step in a stepped-care model for trauma survivors to help identify individuals who need further diagnostics and care.

摘要

为了便于进行创伤相关症状的便捷筛查,开发了一个名为“移动智能评估”(SAM)的基于网络的应用程序。在这项研究中,我们检验了 SAM 是否能够准确识别成年人的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和抑郁症。89 名被推荐的警察在接受诊断访谈之前,使用自己的设备完成了 SAM,其中包含用于精神障碍诊断与统计手册(DSM-5)的 PTSD 清单(PCL-5)和抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS-21),在访谈中使用了用于 DSM-5 的临床医生管理 PTSD 量表(CAPS-5)和 DSM-IV 定式临床访谈(SCID-I/P)。结果表明,SAM 在评估 PTSD 和抑郁症方面与诊断访谈具有实质性的一致性。在 PTSD 清单的截断分数为 31 时,发现了敏感性(89%)和特异性(68%)之间的最佳权衡,曲线下面积为 0.845(95%CI[0.765, 0.925]),诊断比值比为 15.97。这是支持创伤后移动筛查器的有效性和可靠性的首批研究之一。SAM 可以促进大规模的创伤相关症状筛查,并且可能是创伤幸存者阶梯式护理模式的第一步,有助于识别需要进一步诊断和护理的个体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99c7/6877175/5f8edd10294a/MPR-26-e1579-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99c7/6877175/5f8edd10294a/MPR-26-e1579-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99c7/6877175/5f8edd10294a/MPR-26-e1579-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Screening for trauma-related symptoms via a smartphone app: The validity of Smart Assessment on your Mobile in referred police officers.通过智能手机应用程序筛查与创伤相关的症状:Smart Assessment on your Mobile 在转介警官中的有效性。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017 Sep;26(3). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1579.
2
A diagnostic questionnaire for childbirth related posttraumatic stress disorder: a validation study.分娩相关创伤后应激障碍的诊断问卷:一项验证研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul;231(1):134.e1-134.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1229. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3
The validity of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) as screening instrument with Kurdish and Arab displaced populations living in the Kurdistan region of Iraq.DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)作为筛查工具在生活在伊拉克库尔德地区的库尔德和阿拉伯流离失所者中的有效性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 16;18(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1839-z.
4
Validity of the posttraumatic stress disorders (PTSD) checklist in pregnant women.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)检查表在孕妇中的有效性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 12;17(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1304-4.
5
Detecting PTSD in a traumatically injured population: The diagnostic utility of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5.创伤后应激障碍在创伤人群中的检测:DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表的诊断效用。
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Feb;36(2):170-178. doi: 10.1002/da.22873. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
6
Validation of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷验证创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Sep;136(3):313-322. doi: 10.1111/acps.12771. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
7
Screening for PTSD among detained adolescents: Implications of the changes in the DSM-5.被拘留青少年中创伤后应激障碍的筛查:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版变化的影响
Psychol Trauma. 2017 Jan;9(1):10-17. doi: 10.1037/tra0000156. Epub 2016 May 23.
8
Validation of the PCL-5 in Dutch trauma-exposed adults.PCL-5 在荷兰创伤暴露成年人中的验证。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Aug 28;12(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01951-y.
9
Psychometric properties of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale Interview for DSM-5 (PSSI-5).创伤后应激障碍症状量表访谈用于 DSM-5(PSSI-5)的心理测量特性。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Oct;28(10):1159-1165. doi: 10.1037/pas0000259. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
10
The Norwegian version of the PTSD Checklist (PCL): construct validity in a community sample of 2004 tsunami survivors.创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL)的挪威语版本:2004年海啸幸存者社区样本中的结构效度。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;66(5):355-9. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2012.655308. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Are specific PTSD criteria associated with treatment outcome in traumatized veterans and police officers?特定的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)标准与受过创伤的退伍军人和警察的治疗结果相关吗?
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2542702. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2542702. Epub 2025 Aug 27.
2
Beyond one-cutoff-fits-all: determining cutoff values for the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5).超越一刀切:确定《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)的临界值
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2514878. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2514878. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
3
Police officer occupational health: a model of organizational constraints, trauma exposure, perceived resources, and agency.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric Validation of the English and French Versions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5).《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)英文和法文版本的心理测量学验证
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 10;11(10):e0161645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161645. eCollection 2016.
2
Gender and Age Differences in Trauma and PTSD Among Dutch Treatment-Seeking Police Officers.荷兰寻求治疗的警察中创伤和创伤后应激障碍的性别与年龄差异
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017 Feb;205(2):87-92. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000562.
3
Development and refinement of a clinician intervention to facilitate primary care patient use of the PTSD Coach app.
警察职业健康:组织约束、创伤暴露、感知资源与机构的模型。
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2024 Dec 18;19(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12995-024-00444-3.
4
The assessment of reliability generalisation of clinician-administered PTSD scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5): a meta-analysis.《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第5版临床医生施测的创伤后应激障碍量表(CAPS-5)可靠性概括化评估:一项荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 9;15:1354229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1354229. eCollection 2024.
5
Views on the Functionality and Use of the PeerConnect App Among Public Safety Personnel: Qualitative Analysis.公共安全人员对PeerConnect应用程序功能及使用的看法:定性分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 6;7:e46968. doi: 10.2196/46968.
6
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5: A Systematic Review of Existing Psychometric Evidence.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍检查表:对现有心理测量证据的系统评价
Clin Psychol (New York). 2023 Mar;30(1):110-121. doi: 10.1037/cps0000111. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
7
? An informatics analysis study of App Store apps for trauma- and stressor-related disorders.创伤后应激障碍和应激相关障碍的 App Store 应用程序的信息学分析研究。
PeerJ. 2023 May 9;11:e15366. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15366. eCollection 2023.
8
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and Moral Injury Among Ukrainian Civilians During the Ongoing War.乌克兰平民在持续战争中所经历的创伤后应激障碍与道德创伤。
J Community Health. 2023 Oct;48(5):784-792. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01225-5. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
9
Posttraumatic stress disorder in Belgian police officers: prevalence and the effects of exposure to traumatic events.比利时警察创伤后应激障碍:流行程度和创伤性事件暴露的影响。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2156558. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2156558.
10
Cortisol awakening response over the course of humanitarian aid deployment: a prospective cohort study.人道主义援助部署期间的皮质醇觉醒反应:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Dec 21;11(1):1816649. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1816649.
开发并完善一种临床医生干预措施,以促进初级保健患者使用创伤后应激障碍指导应用程序。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Mar;7(1):116-126. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0393-9.
4
Feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of the PTSD Coach app: A pilot randomized controlled trial with community trauma survivors.创伤后应激障碍指导应用程序的可行性、可接受性及潜在疗效:一项针对社区创伤幸存者的随机对照试验试点
Psychol Trauma. 2016 May;8(3):384-392. doi: 10.1037/tra0000092. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
5
Usability Evaluation of a Mobile Monitoring System to Assess Symptoms After a Traumatic Injury: A Mixed-Methods Study.移动监测系统评估创伤后症状的可用性:一项混合方法研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Jan 11;3(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/mental.5023.
6
Psychometric analysis of the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) among treatment-seeking military service members.寻求治疗的军人中创伤后应激障碍检查表-5(PCL-5)的心理测量分析。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1392-1403. doi: 10.1037/pas0000260. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Factor Structure of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5: Relationships Among Symptom Clusters, Anger, and Impulsivity.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍检查表的因子结构:症状群、愤怒和冲动性之间的关系
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016 Feb;204(2):108-15. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000430.
8
Internet-based interventions for posttraumatic stress: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.基于互联网的创伤后应激障碍干预措施:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Feb;43:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
9
Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (PCL-5) in veterans.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)在退伍军人中的心理测量特性
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1379-1391. doi: 10.1037/pas0000254. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
10
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5):编制与初步心理测量评估
J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059. Epub 2015 Nov 25.