• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在家庭医生候诊室推广已故器官和组织捐献登记(RegisterNow-1):一项实用的阶梯式、群组随机对照登记试验。

Promoting deceased organ and tissue donation registration in family physician waiting rooms (RegisterNow-1): a pragmatic stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled registry trial.

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2022 Mar 3;20(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02266-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12916-022-02266-8
PMID:35236353
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8892727/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The shortage of available organs for life-saving transplants persists worldwide. While a majority support donating their organs or tissue when they die, many have not registered their wish to do so. When registered, next of kin are much more likely to follow-through with the decision to donate. In many countries, most people visit their family physician office each year and this setting is a promising, yet underused, site where more people could register for deceased organ donation. Our primary aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to promote organ donation registration in family physician's offices.

METHODS

We developed an intervention to address barriers and enablers to organ donation registration that involved physician office reception staff inviting patients to register on a tablet in the waiting room while they waited for their appointment. We conducted a cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled registry trial to evaluate the intervention. We recruited six family physician offices in Canada. All offices began with usual care and then every two weeks, one office (randomly assigned) started the intervention until all offices delivered the intervention. The primary outcome was registration for deceased organ donation in the provincial organ registration registry, assessed within the 7 days of the physician visit. At the end of the trial, we also conducted interviews with clinic staff to assess any barriers and enablers to delivering the intervention.

RESULTS

The trial involved 24,616 patient visits by 13,562 unique patients: 12,484 visits in the intervention period and 12,132 in the control period. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of patients registered for deceased organ donation in the intervention versus control period (48.0% vs 46.2%; absolute difference after accounting for the secular trend: 0.12%; 95% CI: - 2.30, 2.54; p=0.92). Interviews with clinic staff indicated location of the tablet within a waiting room, patient rapport, existing registration, confidence and motivation to deliver the intervention and competing priorities as barriers and enablers to delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our intervention did not increase donor registration. Nonetheless, family physician offices may still remain a promising setting to develop and evaluate better interventions to increase organ donation registration.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03213171.

摘要

背景

全球范围内,可供用于挽救生命的器官移植的器官短缺问题仍然存在。尽管大多数人支持在去世后捐献器官或组织,但许多人并未登记表示愿意捐献。进行登记后,家属更有可能遵循捐献的决定。在许多国家,大多数人每年都会去家庭医生的诊室就诊,因此诊室是一个很有前景但尚未充分利用的地点,可以让更多的人在那里登记成为已故器官捐献者。我们的主要目的是评估一种干预措施在家庭医生诊室中促进器官捐献登记的效果。

方法

我们制定了一项干预措施,以解决器官捐献登记方面的障碍和促进因素,该措施涉及到医生办公室的接待员在候诊室邀请患者使用平板电脑进行登记,以便在等待预约时完成登记。我们进行了一项横断面、阶梯式楔形集群随机对照登记试验,以评估该干预措施。我们招募了加拿大的六家家庭医生诊室。所有诊室都先进行常规护理,然后每隔两周,一家诊室(随机分配)开始实施干预,直到所有诊室都实施了干预。主要结局是在医生就诊后的 7 天内,在省级器官登记处登记成为已故器官捐献者。在试验结束时,我们还对诊所工作人员进行了访谈,以评估提供干预措施的任何障碍和促进因素。

结果

试验共涉及 13562 名患者的 24616 次就诊:干预期内有 12484 次就诊,对照期内有 12132 次就诊。干预组与对照组患者登记成为已故器官捐献者的比例没有统计学上的显著差异(48.0%比 46.2%;在考虑到季节性趋势后,绝对差异为 0.12%;95%置信区间:-2.30,2.54;p=0.92)。对诊所工作人员的访谈表明,平板电脑在候诊室中的位置、医患关系、现有的登记情况、提供干预措施的信心和积极性以及竞争优先事项是提供干预措施的障碍和促进因素。

结论

我们的干预措施并未增加供者登记。尽管如此,家庭医生诊室仍然可能是一个很有前景的场所,可以在此开发和评估更好的干预措施来增加器官捐献登记。

试验注册

NCT03213171。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6508/8892727/df3cd2d4e763/12916_2022_2266_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6508/8892727/026228aa552e/12916_2022_2266_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6508/8892727/df3cd2d4e763/12916_2022_2266_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6508/8892727/026228aa552e/12916_2022_2266_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6508/8892727/df3cd2d4e763/12916_2022_2266_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Promoting deceased organ and tissue donation registration in family physician waiting rooms (RegisterNow-1): a pragmatic stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled registry trial.在家庭医生候诊室推广已故器官和组织捐献登记(RegisterNow-1):一项实用的阶梯式、群组随机对照登记试验。
BMC Med. 2022 Mar 3;20(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02266-8.
2
Promoting deceased organ and tissue donation registration in family physician waiting rooms (RegisterNow-1 trial): study protocol for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled registry.在家庭医生候诊室推广已故器官和组织捐赠登记(RegisterNow-1试验):一项实用的、阶梯式楔形、整群随机对照登记研究方案
Trials. 2017 Dec 21;18(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2333-5.
3
COMmunication with Families regarding ORgan and Tissue donation after death in intensive care (COMFORT): protocol for an intervention study.重症监护室死亡后与家属就器官和组织捐赠进行沟通(COMFORT):一项干预性研究的方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1964-7.
4
The Patients Save Lives Program to Facilitate Organ Donor Designation in Primary Care Offices.患者拯救生命计划:促进基层医疗办公室的器官捐赠指定
Prog Transplant. 2019 Sep;29(3):204-212. doi: 10.1177/1526924819853836. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Identifying behaviour change techniques within randomized trials of interventions promoting deceased organ donation registration.识别促进死者器官捐献登记干预措施随机试验中的行为改变技术。
Br J Health Psychol. 2022 Sep;27(3):822-843. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12575. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
7
Organ donation video messaging in motor vehicle offices: results of a randomized trial.机动车管理办公室的器官捐赠视频宣传:一项随机试验的结果
Prog Transplant. 2015 Dec;25(4):332-8. doi: 10.7182/pit2015166.
8
If you needed an organ transplant would you have one? The effect of reciprocity priming and mode of delivery on organ donor registration intentions and behaviour.如果你需要进行器官移植,你会接受吗?互惠启动和传递方式对器官捐赠登记意愿及行为的影响。
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Sep;22(3):577-588. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12248. Epub 2017 May 26.
9
10
The effectiveness of an interactive organ donation education intervention for Dutch lower-educated students: a cluster randomized controlled trial.针对荷兰低学历学生的交互式器官捐赠教育干预措施的有效性:一项整群随机对照试验。
Trials. 2019 Nov 21;20(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3882-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs Toward Organ Donation Registration Among Asian Americans: Development and Pilot-testing of Educational Intervention Video.亚裔美国人对器官捐赠登记的知识、态度和信念:教育干预视频的开发与预测试
Transplant Direct. 2024 Aug 8;10(9):e1693. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001693. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Organ Donation: Behaviour and Beliefs in Sweden.器官捐赠:瑞典的行为与观念
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 May 24;10:23779608241257011. doi: 10.1177/23779608241257011. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions for increasing solid organ donor registration.增加实体器官捐献者登记的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 4;4(4):CD10829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010829.pub2.
2
Improving access to organ donor registration in general practice: a feasibility study.提高普通实践中器官捐献登记的可及性:一项可行性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jun 25;70(696):e497-e504. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X709601. Print 2020 Jul.
3
The Patients Save Lives Program to Facilitate Organ Donor Designation in Primary Care Offices.患者拯救生命计划:促进基层医疗办公室的器官捐赠指定
Prog Transplant. 2019 Sep;29(3):204-212. doi: 10.1177/1526924819853836. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
4
Introducing the new CONSORT extension for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.介绍用于阶梯楔形整群随机试验的新CONSORT扩展。
Trials. 2019 Jan 18;20(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3116-3.
5
An evaluation of a motor vehicle facility campaign with an established statewide donor registry: A test of sustainable, evidence-based intervention strategies.一项针对建立全州范围内捐赠者登记处的机动车辆设施活动的评估:对可持续的、基于证据的干预策略的测试。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Mar;33(3):e13475. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13475. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
6
Promoting deceased organ and tissue donation registration in family physician waiting rooms (RegisterNow-1 trial): study protocol for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled registry.在家庭医生候诊室推广已故器官和组织捐赠登记(RegisterNow-1试验):一项实用的、阶梯式楔形、整群随机对照登记研究方案
Trials. 2017 Dec 21;18(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2333-5.
7
Primary care interventions to encourage organ donation registration: A systematic review.鼓励器官捐献登记的初级保健干预措施:系统评价。
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2017 Oct;31(4):268-275. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 2.
8
Registration for deceased organ and tissue donation among Ontario immigrants: a population-based cross-sectional study.安大略省移民中已故器官和组织捐赠登记情况:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
CMAJ Open. 2016 Oct 11;4(4):E551-E561. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160024. eCollection 2016 Oct-Dec.
9
Sample size calculation for stepped wedge and other longitudinal cluster randomised trials.阶梯楔形及其他纵向整群随机试验的样本量计算
Stat Med. 2016 Nov 20;35(26):4718-4728. doi: 10.1002/sim.7028. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
10
Effects of a Video on Organ Donation Consent Among Primary Care Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.视频对基层医疗患者器官捐赠同意率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Aug;31(8):832-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3630-5.