Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Veterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Dec;55(12):3411-3425. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00728-17. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
A novel lateral flow immunochromatographic device (LFD) was evaluated in several veterinary diagnostic laboratories. It was confirmed to be specific for and cells. The performance of the novel LFD was assessed relative to the confirmatory tests routinely applied after culture (spoligotyping or quantitative PCR [qPCR]) in each laboratory; liquid (MGIT or BacT/Alert) and/or solid (Stonebrink, Coletsos, or Lowenstein-Jensen) cultures were tested. In comparison to spoligotyping of acid-fast-positive MGIT cultures, percent agreement between positive LFD and spoligotyping results was excellent in two United Kingdom laboratories (97.7 to 100%) but lower in the Spanish context (76%), where spoligotyping was applied to MGIT cultures previously confirmed to be positive for complex (MTBC) by qPCR. Certain spoligotypes of and were not detected by the LFD in Spanish MGIT cultures. Compared to qPCR confirmation, the agreement between positive LFD and qPCR results was 42.3% and 50% for BacT/Alert and MGIT liquid cultures, respectively, and for solid cultures, it ranged from 11.1 to 89.2%, depending on the solid medium employed (Coletsos, 11.1%; Lowenstein-Jensen, 55.6%; Stonebrinks, 89.2%). Correlation between the novel LFD and BD MGIT TBc Identification test results was excellent when 190 MGIT cultures were tested ( = 0.9791; < 0.0001), with the added benefit that was differentiated from another MTBC species in one MGIT culture by the novel LFD. This multilaboratory evaluation demonstrated the novel LFD's potential utility as a rapid test to confirm isolation of and from veterinary specimens following culture.
一种新型的侧向流动免疫层析设备(LFD)在几个兽医诊断实验室中进行了评估。它被证实对 和 细胞具有特异性。新型 LFD 的性能相对于每个实验室常规应用于培养后( spoligotyping 或定量 PCR [qPCR])的确认测试进行了评估;测试了液体(MGIT 或 BacT/Alert)和/或固体(Stonebrink、Coletsos 或 Lowenstein-Jensen)培养物。与酸性阳性 MGIT 培养物 spoligotyping 相比,在两个英国实验室中,LFD 阳性与 spoligotyping 结果之间的百分比一致性非常好(97.7%至 100%),但在西班牙环境下较低(76%), spoligotyping 应用于先前通过 qPCR 确认阳性的 MTBC 的 MGIT 培养物。在西班牙 MGIT 培养物中,某些 和 的 spoligotypes 未被 LFD 检测到。与 qPCR 确认相比,LFD 阳性与 BacT/Alert 和 MGIT 液体培养物 qPCR 结果之间的一致性分别为 42.3%和 50%,而对于固体培养物,其范围从 11.1%到 89.2%,具体取决于所使用的固体培养基(Coletsos,11.1%;Lowenstein-Jensen,55.6%;Stonebrinks,89.2%)。当测试了 190 个 MGIT 培养物时,新型 LFD 与 BD MGIT TBc 鉴定测试结果之间的相关性非常好( = 0.9791; < 0.0001),并且新型 LFD 可以在一个 MGIT 培养物中将 与另一种 MTBC 物种区分开来。该多实验室评估表明,新型 LFD 具有作为一种快速测试的潜力,可在培养后从兽医标本中确认分离 和 。