Osumi Takahiro, Ohira Hideki
Department of Psychology, Hiroshima Shudo UniversityHiroshima, Japan.
Department of Psychology, Nagoya UniversityNagoya, Japan.
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 13;8:1604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01604. eCollection 2017.
Psychopathy is a group of personality traits that are associated with violations of social norms. Previous studies have suggested that people with psychopathic traits in subclinical populations do not necessarily display antisocial, self-defeating behaviors, and instead may strategically show adaptive behaviors in response to cues during reciprocal social interactions. Therefore, in the present study, we examined whether the association between psychopathic traits and unfair behavior can be moderated by a potential for punishment and social distance (anonymity), which are known to facilitate fair behavior. We focused on two psychopathic traits: primary and secondary psychopathy. Primary psychopathy is characterized by callousness, shallow affect, manipulation, and superficial charm. In contrast, secondary psychopathy is associated with impulsivity and lack of long-term goals, and is related to hostile behavior. A total of 348 undergraduate students determined the amounts of money that they would offer to strangers or friends at their university in hypothetical scenarios of the ultimatum game (UG) and the dictator game (DG). While gender affected decisions in the hypothetical scenarios of the DG, it did not interact with psychopathic traits. The score for primary psychopathy on the Levenson self-report psychopathy scale predicted unfair monetary offers to strangers in the DG, where participants could not be punished. However, compared with their offers in the DG, individuals with higher scores for primary psychopathy made larger offers in the UG, where low offers could trigger punishment from the recipient. Moreover, primary psychopathy did not decrease the amounts of offers in either game when the participant considered the recipient to be a friend. On the other hand, secondary psychopathy was not associated with differences in behavioral fairness depending on a potential for punishment or social distance. Based on these findings, we discuss strategic social skills as a function of primary psychopathy.
精神病态是一组与违反社会规范相关的人格特质。先前的研究表明,亚临床人群中具有精神病态特质的人不一定会表现出反社会、自我挫败的行为,相反,在相互的社会互动中,他们可能会根据线索策略性地表现出适应性行为。因此,在本研究中,我们考察了惩罚可能性和社会距离(匿名性)是否能够调节精神病态特质与不公平行为之间的关联,而惩罚可能性和社会距离已知有助于促进公平行为。我们聚焦于两种精神病态特质:原发性精神病态和继发性精神病态。原发性精神病态的特征是冷酷无情、情感淡漠、善于操纵和表面魅力。相比之下,继发性精神病态与冲动性和缺乏长期目标相关,并且与敌对行为有关。共有348名本科生在最后通牒博弈(UG)和独裁者博弈(DG)的假设情境中,确定他们会向本校的陌生人或朋友提供的金钱数额。虽然性别在独裁者博弈的假设情境中影响决策,但它与精神病态特质没有相互作用。莱文森自我报告精神病态量表上的原发性精神病态得分预测了独裁者博弈中对陌生人的不公平金钱提议,在该博弈中参与者不会受到惩罚。然而,与他们在独裁者博弈中的提议相比,原发性精神病态得分较高的个体在最后通牒博弈中给出了更高的提议,在最后通牒博弈中低提议可能会引发接受者的惩罚。此外,当参与者认为接受者是朋友时,原发性精神病态在任何一个博弈中都没有减少提议的金额。另一方面,继发性精神病态与基于惩罚可能性或社会距离的行为公平性差异无关。基于这些发现,我们将策略性社交技能作为原发性精神病态的一个功能进行讨论。