Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Bldg. 71, Room G335, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993. Email:
Tufts University, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Boston, Massachusetts.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Sep 28;14:E86. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.170066.
We examined US adults' understanding of a Nutrition Facts panel (NFP), which requires health literacy (ie, prose, document, and quantitative literacy skills), and the association between label understanding and dietary behavior.
Data were from the Health Information National Trends Survey, a nationally representative survey of health information seeking among US adults (N = 3,185) conducted from September 6, 2013, through December 30, 2013. Participants viewed an ice cream nutrition label and answered 4 questions that tested their ability to apply basic arithmetic and understanding of percentages to interpret the label. Participants reported their intake of sugar-sweetened soda, fruits, and vegetables. Regression analyses tested associations among label understanding, demographic characteristics, and self-reported dietary behaviors.
Approximately 24% of people could not determine the calorie content of the full ice-cream container, 21% could not estimate the number of servings equal to 60 g of carbohydrates, 42% could not estimate the effect on daily calorie intake of foregoing 1 serving, and 41% could not calculate the percentage daily value of calories in a single serving. Higher scores for label understanding were associated with consuming more vegetables and less sugar-sweetened soda, although only the association with soda consumption remained significant after adjusting for demographic factors.
Many consumers have difficulty interpreting nutrition labels, and label understanding correlates with self-reported dietary behaviors. The 2016 revised NFP labels may address some deficits in consumer understanding by eliminating the need to perform certain calculations (eg, total calories per package). However, some tasks still require the ability to perform calculations (eg, percentage daily value of calories). Schools have a role in teaching skills, such as mathematics, needed for nutrition label understanding.
我们研究了美国成年人对营养成分表(NFP)的理解,这需要健康素养(即散文、文件和定量素养技能),以及标签理解与饮食行为之间的关系。
数据来自健康信息国家趋势调查,这是一项针对美国成年人健康信息寻求的全国代表性调查(N=3185),于 2013 年 9 月 6 日至 12 月 30 日进行。参与者查看了冰淇淋营养标签,并回答了 4 个问题,这些问题测试了他们应用基本算术和理解百分比来解释标签的能力。参与者报告了他们对含糖苏打水、水果和蔬菜的摄入量。回归分析测试了标签理解、人口统计学特征和自我报告的饮食行为之间的关联。
约 24%的人无法确定整个冰淇淋容器的卡路里含量,21%的人无法估计等于 60 克碳水化合物的份数,42%的人无法估计放弃 1 份对每日卡路里摄入量的影响,41%的人无法计算每份的卡路里每日价值百分比。标签理解得分较高与食用更多蔬菜和更少含糖苏打水有关,尽管在调整人口统计学因素后,与苏打水消费的关联仍然显著。
许多消费者难以解释营养标签,标签理解与自我报告的饮食行为相关。2016 年修订的 NFP 标签通过消除某些计算(例如,每包总卡路里)的需求,可能会解决一些消费者理解上的缺陷。然而,一些任务仍然需要计算能力(例如,卡路里每日价值的百分比)。学校在教授理解营养标签所需的技能方面(例如,数学)发挥着作用。